Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → home / users / everlier everlier 165 karma
7y 6m on HN
HN profile →
▶ Evaluate All (1)
https://github.com/av
Coverage
We've seen 3 of
~126 submissions
Full eval: 1 Lite-only: 1 Unevaluated: 1
Deep Read
section-level analysis · 1 full evaluation
HRCB +0.42
range 0.00 · +100% / 0% / 0%− E-full / S +0.42 / +0.26 SETL +0.25 Signals EQ 0.82 SO 0.65 TD 0.50
UDHR Fingerprint Preamble: +0.39 Freedom & Equality: +0.29 Non-Discrimination: +0.40 Life & Liberty: +0.60 No Slavery: ND No Torture: ND Legal Personhood: ND Equal Protection: ND Right to Remedy: ND No Arbitrary Detention: +0.32 Fair Hearing: ND Presumption of Innocence: ND Privacy: +0.23 Freedom of Movement: +0.28 Asylum: ND Nationality: ND Marriage & Family: ND Property: ND Freedom of Thought: ND Free Expression: +0.75 Assembly: +0.36 Political Participation: +0.29 Social Security: ND Work & Pay: ND Rest & Leisure: ND Standard of Living: +0.31 Education: +0.54 Culture & Science: +0.54 Social Order: +0.34 Duties: +0.29 No Destruction of Rights: +0.42
Quick Scan
holistic editorial estimate · 1 lite evaluation
Editorial [E]: 0.00
Llama · truncated content · holistic (not section-level)
Lens divergence detected
Quick scan (0.00 )
vs full evaluation (+0.42 )
· Δ 0.42
The holistic Llama estimate and section-level Claude evaluation disagree by more than 0.15.
The full evaluation is more reliable for individual story analysis.
3 stories