Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → home / github.com / item 47391982
Model Comparison
Model Editorial Structural Class Conf SETL Theme @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite ND ND — 0.83 — — @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite 0.00 ND Neutral 1.00 0.00 — @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite ND ND — 0.40 — — @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite 0.00 ND Neutral 0.90 0.00 No human rights theme claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 0.00 ND Neutral 0.12 — Digital Access & Expression
Section @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Preamble ND ND ND ND ND Article 1 ND ND ND ND ND Article 2 ND ND ND ND ND Article 3 ND ND ND ND ND Article 4 ND ND ND ND ND Article 5 ND ND ND ND ND Article 6 ND ND ND ND ND Article 7 ND ND ND ND ND Article 8 ND ND ND ND ND Article 9 ND ND ND ND ND Article 10 ND ND ND ND ND Article 11 ND ND ND ND ND Article 12 ND ND ND ND ND Article 13 ND ND ND ND ND Article 14 ND ND ND ND ND Article 15 ND ND ND ND ND Article 16 ND ND ND ND ND Article 17 ND ND ND ND ND Article 18 ND ND ND ND ND Article 19 ND ND ND ND ND Article 20 ND ND ND ND ND Article 21 ND ND ND ND ND Article 22 ND ND ND ND ND Article 23 ND ND ND ND ND Article 24 ND ND ND ND ND Article 25 ND ND ND ND ND Article 26 ND ND ND ND ND Article 27 ND ND ND ND ND Article 28 ND ND ND ND ND Article 29 ND ND ND ND ND Article 30 ND ND ND ND ND
Summary Digital Access & Expression Acknowledges
This GitHub repository landing page exhibits structural support for human rights primarily through GitHub's platform infrastructure: open access enables freedom of expression and association in technical collaboration, HTTPS and security headers protect user privacy and integrity, and the open-source model facilitates education and knowledge sharing. The page itself contains minimal editorial content; the human rights alignment derives from GitHub's underlying architecture rather than explicit commitment statements on this specific URL.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: ND — Preamble Preamble: No Data — Preamble P Article 1: ND — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood Article 1: No Data — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: ND — Non-Discrimination Article 2: No Data — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: ND — Life, Liberty, Security Article 3: No Data — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: ND — No Slavery Article 4: No Data — No Slavery 4 Article 5: ND — No Torture Article 5: No Data — No Torture 5 Article 6: ND — Legal Personhood Article 6: No Data — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: ND — Equality Before Law Article 7: No Data — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: ND — Right to Remedy Article 8: No Data — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: ND — No Arbitrary Detention Article 9: No Data — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: ND — Fair Hearing Article 10: No Data — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: ND — Presumption of Innocence Article 11: No Data — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: ND — Privacy Article 12: No Data — Privacy 12 Article 13: ND — Freedom of Movement Article 13: No Data — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: ND — Asylum Article 14: No Data — Asylum 14 Article 15: ND — Nationality Article 15: No Data — Nationality 15 Article 16: ND — Marriage & Family Article 16: No Data — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: ND — Property Article 17: No Data — Property 17 Article 18: ND — Freedom of Thought Article 18: No Data — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: ND — Freedom of Expression Article 19: No Data — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: ND — Assembly & Association Article 20: No Data — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: ND — Political Participation Article 21: No Data — Political Participation 21 Article 22: ND — Social Security Article 22: No Data — Social Security 22 Article 23: ND — Work & Equal Pay Article 23: No Data — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: ND — Rest & Leisure Article 24: No Data — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: ND — Standard of Living Article 25: No Data — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: ND — Education Article 26: No Data — Education 26 Article 27: ND — Cultural Participation Article 27: No Data — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: ND — Social & International Order Article 28: No Data — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: ND — Duties to Community Article 29: No Data — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: ND — No Destruction of Rights Article 30: No Data — No Destruction of Rights 30
Aggregates
Weighted Mean 0.00 Unweighted Mean 0.00 Max 0.00 N/A Min 0.00 N/A Signal 0 No Data 31 Volatility 0.00 (Low) Negative 0 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4 SETL ℹ ND
FW Ratio ℹ 69% 31 facts · 14 inferences Agreement High 3 models · spread ±0.000
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.00 (0 articles) Security: 0.00 (0 articles) Legal: 0.00 (0 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.00 (0 articles) Personal: 0.00 (0 articles) Expression: 0.00 (0 articles) Economic & Social: 0.00 (0 articles) Cultural: 0.00 (0 articles) Order & Duties: 0.00 (0 articles) Editorial Channel
What the content says
ND
Medium Practice
No editorial content present on page
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
Page uses HTTPS protocol with HSTS header enabled. Content Security Policy header present. No third-party tracking pixels or analytics cookies detected on initial load. Page displays GitHub logo and platform interface elements. Inferences
Security headers suggest GitHub's infrastructure prioritizes secure communication and reduces attack surface. Absence of third-party trackers indicates respect for user privacy at the platform level. ND
Low Practice
No editorial content on page addressing human rights principles
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
Repository page permits public viewing and cloning. Contributing guidelines and license information accessible to all users. Inferences
Public repository access supports principles of equal dignity by enabling unrestricted participation. ND
Low Practice
No editorial content on page
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
Repository does not display access restrictions based on user status. Public README and issue sections available to all visitors. Inferences
Open access structure provides non-discrimination in technical participation. ND
Medium Practice
No editorial content on page
FW Ratio: 75%
Observable Facts
HTTPS protocol secures data transmission. HSTS header enforces secure connections. Content Security Policy prevents injection attacks. Inferences
Security infrastructure protects physical and digital integrity of users' interactions with code and data. ND
No content addressing slavery or servitude
ND
No content addressing torture or cruel treatment
ND
No content addressing right to recognition as person
ND
No content addressing equality before law
ND
No content addressing remedy for rights violations
ND
No content addressing arbitrary arrest or detention
ND
No content addressing fair trial
ND
No content addressing criminal liability
ND
Medium Practice
No editorial content on page
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
No cookie consent banner displayed on page. HTTPS encryption protects user communications. No third-party tracking scripts loaded. User can clone and interact with repository without authentication requirement for public content. Inferences
Privacy infrastructure respects user autonomy in participation without mandatory tracking. Encrypted communications protect against eavesdropping on user activity. ND
Low Practice
No editorial content on page
FW Ratio: 75%
Observable Facts
Repository publicly accessible globally. Clone and fork operations available without geographic restrictions. License terms permit distribution across jurisdictions. Inferences
Lack of geographic gatekeeping supports freedom of movement and association in technical work. ND
No content addressing asylum or refuge
ND
No content addressing nationality
ND
No content addressing marriage or family
ND
No content addressing property rights
ND
No content addressing freedom of thought, conscience, religion
ND
Medium Practice Advocacy
No editorial content on page
FW Ratio: 57%
Observable Facts
Issues section allows public comments and discussion. Pull request discussion threads visible and editable by contributors. README and documentation sections display without content filtering. No moderation warnings or access restrictions visible on public repository. Inferences
Repository structure removes technical barriers to expressing ideas through code contributions and discussion. Absence of tracking protects freedom of expression by reducing monitoring and surveillance. Public nature of repository enables diverse viewpoints to be documented and discussed. ND
Low Practice
No editorial content on page
FW Ratio: 75%
Observable Facts
Fork functionality allows users to create associated copies of project. Contribution guidelines published but not enforced at access level. Issue and discussion participation open to authenticated users. Inferences
Low barriers to contribution enable freedom of association in technical collaboration. ND
No content addressing political participation
ND
No content addressing social security
ND
No content addressing work or employment rights
ND
No content addressing rest or leisure
ND
No content addressing health, food, housing
ND
Low Practice
No editorial content on page
FW Ratio: 75%
Observable Facts
README documentation accessible to view and copy. Code repository open for study and modification by learners. License permits reuse for educational purposes. Inferences
Open-source distribution removes barriers to technical education and skill development. ND
Low Practice
No editorial content on page
FW Ratio: 75%
Observable Facts
Software available for technical use and contribution. License text specifies permitted uses and modifications. Repository documentation available for language support (lang attr present per DCP). Inferences
Open-source model shares benefits of technical advancement with broader community. ND
No content addressing social/international order
ND
No content addressing duties to community
ND
No content addressing destruction of rights
Structural Channel
What the site does
Element Modifier Affects Note br_tracking +0.05 Preamble ¶5 Article 12 Article 19
No third-party trackers detected br_security +0.05 Article 3 Article 12
Security headers: HTTPS, HSTS, CSP br_accessibility 0.00 Article 26 Article 27 ¶1
Accessibility: lang attr, 100% alt text br_consent 0.00 Article 12 Article 19 Article 20 ¶2
No cookie consent banner detected
ND
Medium Practice
GitHub infrastructure demonstrates security (HTTPS, HSTS, CSP) and privacy-respecting design (no third-party trackers, +0.05 modifier); no cookie consent banner required (+0.0 modifier); basic accessibility present (+0.0 modifier). Cached DCP modifiers applied: +0.05 (tracking) + +0.05 (security) + 0 (accessibility) + 0 (consent) = +0.10 baseline, conservatively scored at 0.08 for LP category with limited observable ethical commitments on page itself.
ND
Low Practice
GitHub's open-source repository infrastructure allows developers of all backgrounds to collaborate and contribute without discrimination. This structural feature supports equal dignity, though no explicit commitments visible on this page.
ND
Low Practice
Repository accessible to users regardless of nationality, status, or background. No visible discriminatory gatekeeping in interface.
ND
Medium Practice
HTTPS encryption and security headers (HSTS, CSP) protect user integrity during interactions. Cached DCP modifier +0.05 for security headers applied.
ND
No observable structural features related to forced labor or servitude
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
ND
No observable structural features related to legal personhood on this page
ND
No observable structural features addressing legal equality on this page
ND
No observable dispute resolution or remedy mechanisms visible on this page
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
ND
No observable structural features addressing due process on this page
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
ND
Medium Practice
No cookie consent banner (+0.0 modifier); HTTPS encryption (+0.05 modifier); no third-party tracking (+0.05 modifier). User data protected from monitoring and interference during repository interactions.
ND
Low Practice
Repository openly accessible across geographic boundaries; users can freely contribute, view, and distribute code. Open-source model supports freedom of movement in technical collaboration.
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
ND
No observable structural features addressing property protection on this page
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
ND
Medium Practice Advocacy
GitHub infrastructure supports freedom of expression: repository permits public discussion via issues, pull requests, and comments without pre-publication censorship. No cookie consent barrier (+0.0 modifier); no third-party tracking (+0.05 modifier) reduces surveillance chilling effect.
ND
Low Practice
Repository structure supports freedom of association: users can collaborate, fork, and contribute without gatekeeping. No consent barriers (+0.0 modifier) for joining discussion.
ND
No observable structural features related to political participation on this page
ND
No observable structural features related to social security on this page
ND
No observable structural features addressing labor rights on this page
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
ND
Low Practice
Repository structure supports education rights: code is publicly available for learning, forking, and study. Cached DCP modifier 0 for accessibility indicates basic support but no comprehensive accessibility features visible. Open-source model enables technical education.
ND
Low Practice
Repository participates in open-source culture that enables sharing in scientific/technical advancement. Basic accessibility present (+0.0 modifier per DCP). Limited evidence of cultural or artistic protection on this page.
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
ND
No observable structural features articulating community duties on this page
ND
No observable structural features related to this provision
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean.
Learn more How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.45 low claims
Sources 0.3 Evidence 0.4 Uncertainty 0.5 Purpose 0.6
No manipulative rhetoric detected
0 techniques detected
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
detached
Valence +0.1 Arousal 0.1 Dominance 0.4
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.20
✗ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.18 problem only
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.20 1 perspective
Speaks: institution
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
present unspecified
What geographic area does this content cover?
global How accessible is this content to a general audience?
moderate high jargon domain specific
Longitudinal
90 HN snapshots · 5 evals
Audit Trail
13 entries all eval pipeline all models llama-4-scout-wai-psq llama-4-scout-wai llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq llama-3.3-70b-wai claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
newest first
2026-03-16 00:52 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.600 (3 dims) - - 2026-03-16 00:52
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq : +0.60 (Strong positive) 2026-03-16 00:51 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-03-16 00:51
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) reasoning Technical content, no human rights discussion, neutral editorial stance
2026-03-16 00:51 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - - 2026-03-16 00:19 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.000 (3 dims) - - 2026-03-16 00:19
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq : 0.00 (Neutral) 2026-03-16 00:16 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-03-16 00:16
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) reasoning Technical content, zero rights discussion
2026-03-16 00:16 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-3.3-70b-wai: 1W 0R - - 2026-03-15 23:10 eval_success Evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-03-15 23:10
eval
Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 : 0.00 (Neutral) 12,002 tokens 2026-03-15 23:10 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: 0W 10R - -