+0.56 Drone strikes in Haiti that killed 1250, 17 children, condemned by rights group (haitiantimes.com S:+0.28 )
175 points by e12e 2 days ago | 109 comments on HN | Moderate positive Contested Low agreement (3 models) Editorial · v3.7 · 2026-03-16 00:51:06 0
Summary Right to Life & Civilian Protection Advocates
This news article reports on Human Rights Watch's condemnation of drone strikes in Haiti that resulted in 1,250 deaths, including 17 children. The content strongly advocates for the right to life and universal human dignity by centering the perspectives and data of international human rights organizations, while documenting violations of fundamental UDHR protections. The reporting demonstrates freedom of expression by publishing criticism of military action and treats all victims as equal rights-holders regardless of nationality.
Rights Tensions 1 pair
Art 3 ↔ Art 12 — Right to life (Article 3) is protected through freedom of expression reporting (Article 19) that documents violations, while site infrastructure compromises privacy (Article 12) through tracking despite consent denials.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: +0.65 — Preamble P Article 1: +0.70 — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: +0.65 — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: +0.75 — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: +0.70 — No Slavery 4 Article 5: +0.70 — No Torture 5 Article 6: +0.75 — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: +0.70 — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: +0.65 — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: +0.70 — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: +0.65 — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: +0.68 — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: -0.20 — Privacy 12 Article 13: +0.43 — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: +0.60 — Asylum 14 Article 15: +0.05 — Nationality 15 Article 16: +0.05 — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: +0.05 — Property 17 Article 18: +0.05 — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +0.73 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: +0.80 — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: +0.05 — Political Participation 21 Article 22: +0.05 — Social Security 22 Article 23: +0.05 — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: +0.05 — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: +0.10 — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: +0.05 — Education 26 Article 27: +0.05 — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: +0.50 — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: +0.10 — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: +0.05 — No Destruction of Rights 30
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
E
+0.56
S
+0.28
Weighted Mean +0.48 Unweighted Mean +0.38
Max +0.80 Article 20 Min -0.20 Article 12
Signal 31 No Data 0
Volatility 0.32 (High)
Negative 1 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4
SETL ℹ +0.40 Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio ℹ 51% 30 facts · 29 inferences
Agreement Low 3 models · spread ±0.209
Evidence 34% coverage ℹ
6H 7M 1L 17 ND
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.67 (3 articles) Security: 0.72 (3 articles) Legal: 0.69 (6 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.22 (4 articles) Personal: 0.05 (3 articles) Expression: 0.53 (3 articles) Economic & Social: 0.06 (4 articles) Cultural: 0.05 (2 articles) Order & Duties: 0.22 (3 articles)
Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.75
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
High Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.75
SETL
ND

Content directly engages right to life by documenting extrajudicial killing through drone strikes. The report centers on 1,250 deaths, asserting that arbitrary lethal force violates fundamental human rights regardless of geopolitical context.

+0.75
Article 6 Legal Personhood
High Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.75
SETL
ND

Content affirms right to recognition as person before the law by documenting individuals killed in drone strikes. Coverage implicitly asserts that victims retain legal personality and rights status despite death.

+0.70
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
High Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.70
SETL
ND

Content affirms equal rights and dignity of all humans by documenting drone strike victims and centering their harm. Coverage of civilian deaths implicitly asserts universal human dignity independent of nationality or political status.

+0.70
Article 4 No Slavery
High Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.70
SETL
ND

Content implicitly addresses slavery and servitude by documenting situations where populations are subject to extrajudicial killing without recourse. Haitian context suggests systemic vulnerability of population to arbitrary violence.

+0.70
Article 5 No Torture
High Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.70
SETL
ND

Content documents torture and cruel treatment by reporting drone strikes that killed 1,250 people including children. The scale and method implicate violations of protection from torture and cruel harm.

+0.70
Article 7 Equality Before Law
High Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.70
SETL
ND

Content addresses equal protection before law by highlighting HRW condemnation of drone strikes without apparent legal justification. Reporting frames killings as violations of equal protection and due process.

+0.70
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention
High Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.70
SETL
ND

Content documents arbitrary arrest and detention through reporting drone strikes that targeted individuals. Coverage frames strikes as violations of protection from arbitrary detention and violence.

+0.70
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Coverage Practice
Editorial
+0.70
SETL
+0.62

Content exemplifies freedom of expression and information by reporting human rights group condemnation of drone strikes. The article presents facts, sources, and critical perspective on government violence without apparent censorship.

+0.68
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence
High Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.68
SETL
ND

Content documents presumption of innocence violations by reporting drone strikes on civilians including children. Victims killed without trial, presumption of innocence, or protection from retroactive judgment.

+0.65
Preamble Preamble
High Advocacy
Editorial
+0.65
SETL
ND

Content advocates for human dignity and freedom from arbitrary harm by reporting on human rights group condemnation of drone strikes that killed civilians including children. Frames the issue as a violation of inherent human rights and dignity.

+0.65
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
High Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.65
SETL
ND

Content condemns discrimination in the application of lethal force. By highlighting drone strikes in Haiti targeting civilians including children, the narrative questions whether non-discrimination protections extend equally to this context.

+0.65
Article 8 Right to Remedy
Medium Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.65
SETL
ND

Content implies denial of effective remedy by documenting drone strikes that killed 1,250 people with HRW condemnation (rather than government accountability action) as the sole response reported.

+0.65
Article 10 Fair Hearing
Medium Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.65
SETL
ND

Content addresses right to fair and public hearing by documenting killings that preclude any judicial process. Drone strike victims cannot access fair trials or judicial review.

+0.65
Article 13 Freedom of Movement
Medium Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.65
SETL
+0.60

Content implicitly addresses freedom of movement by documenting drone strikes that kill civilians. Restriction of movement through fear of extrajudicial killing violates freedom to move and reside.

+0.65
Article 20 Assembly & Association
High Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.65
SETL
ND

Content supports freedom of peaceful assembly by documenting human rights group (HRW) mobilization against drone strikes. The report enables readers to understand and participate in collective advocacy.

+0.60
Article 14 Asylum
Medium Advocacy Coverage
Editorial
+0.60
SETL
ND

Content addresses right to asylum by documenting violence in Haiti that may force displacement. Drone strikes killing 1,250 civilians create conditions driving asylum-seeking.

+0.50
Article 28 Social & International Order
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
ND

Content addresses right to social and international order protecting rights by documenting failures of such order in Haiti context. Drone strikes demonstrate absence of effective international legal framework preventing extrajudicial killing.

+0.10
Article 25 Standard of Living
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.10
SETL
ND

Content implicitly addresses standard of living and health by documenting drone strikes that kill civilians, which undermines material well-being and health security.

+0.10
Article 29 Duties to Community
Low
Editorial
+0.10
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to limitations on rights exercise or community responsibility.

+0.05
Article 12 Privacy
High Framing
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
+0.27

Content does not directly address privacy or home protection; no editorial engagement with Article 12.

+0.05
Article 15 Nationality
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to nationality rights, citizenship, or denationalization.

+0.05
Article 16 Marriage & Family
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to marriage, family rights, or family protection.

+0.05
Article 17 Property
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to property rights or protection of property.

+0.05
Article 18 Freedom of Thought
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to thought, conscience, religion, or belief.

+0.05
Article 21 Political Participation
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to political participation, voting, or public service access.

+0.05
Article 22 Social Security
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to social security, employment security, or social welfare rights.

+0.05
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to work, fair wages, or labor rights.

+0.05
Article 24 Rest & Leisure
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to rest, leisure, or working hour limitations.

+0.05
Article 26 Education
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to education rights or educational access.

+0.05
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to culture, arts, or intellectual property.

+0.05
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights
Low
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
ND

Content makes no observable reference to destruction or derogation of UDHR rights.
Structural Channel
What the site does
Element Modifier Affects Note
Legal & Terms
Privacy -0.05
Article 12
Google consent defaults deny analytics and personalization across EU regions, indicating privacy awareness but geographically limited enforcement.
Terms of Service —
No accessible Terms of Service detected in provided content.
Identity & Mission
Mission +0.15
Article 19 Article 20
Domain name 'Haitian Times' suggests editorial mission aligned with Haitian community information; news reporting on human rights issues supports freedom of expression and assembly.
Editorial Code —
No editorial code of conduct or standards statement observable.
Ownership —
Ownership and corporate structure not disclosed in provided content.
Access & Distribution
Access Model +0.10
Article 19
No paywall observed; content appears openly accessible, supporting free access to information.
Ad/Tracking -0.08
Article 12
Google Site Kit and advertising framework present; data collection configured despite consent denials in EU regions.
Accessibility —
No accessibility signals (alt text, ARIA labels, etc.) observable in provided markup.
+0.15
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Coverage Practice
Structural
+0.15
Context Modifier
+0.25
SETL
+0.62

Site operates as news platform with open access to information. No paywall or registration barrier restricts access to this human rights reporting. Domain mission (Haitian Times) supports freedom of expression for Haitian community.

+0.10
Article 13 Freedom of Movement
Medium Advocacy Coverage
Structural
+0.10
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.60

Site accessible without paywall or geographic restrictions, supporting freedom of information movement and access.

-0.25
Article 12 Privacy
High Framing
Structural
-0.25
Context Modifier
-0.13
SETL
+0.27

Site implements Google consent framework denying analytics and personalization in EU regions but maintains ad tracking infrastructure. Data collection framework operational despite consent denials indicates privacy protection gaps.

ND
Preamble Preamble
High Advocacy

No structural signals observable regarding Preamble.

ND
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
High Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 1.

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
High Advocacy Framing

No structural signals observable regarding Article 2.

ND
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
High Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 3.

ND
Article 4 No Slavery
High Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 4.

ND
Article 5 No Torture
High Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 5.

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood
High Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 6.

ND
Article 7 Equality Before Law
High Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 7.

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy
Medium Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 8.

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention
High Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 9.

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing
Medium Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 10.

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence
High Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 11.

ND
Article 14 Asylum
Medium Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 14.

ND
Article 15 Nationality
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 15.

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 16.

ND
Article 17 Property
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 17.

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 18.

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association
High Advocacy Coverage

No structural signals observable regarding Article 20.

ND
Article 21 Political Participation
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 21.

ND
Article 22 Social Security
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 22.

ND
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 23.

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 24.

ND
Article 25 Standard of Living
Medium Framing

No structural signals observable regarding Article 25.

ND
Article 26 Education
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 26.

ND
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 27.

ND
Article 28 Social & International Order
Medium Advocacy Framing

No structural signals observable regarding Article 28.

ND
Article 29 Duties to Community
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 29.

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights
Low

No structural signals observable regarding Article 30.
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean. Learn more
Epistemic Quality ℹ
How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.66 medium claims
Sources
0.8
Evidence
0.7
Uncertainty
0.5
Purpose
0.7
Propaganda Flags ℹ
2 manipulative rhetoric techniques found
2 techniques detected
loaded language
Headline emphasizes 'condemned' by rights group and specific mention of '17 children' to activate emotional response rather than neutral reporting.
appeal to authority
Heavy reliance on HRW condemnation as the sole authoritative framing without presenting counter-arguments or military justification.
Emotional Tone ℹ
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
solemn
Valence
-0.8
Arousal
0.7
Dominance
0.3
Transparency ℹ
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.30
✗ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience
Solution Orientation ℹ
Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.32 problem only
Reader Agency
0.2
Stakeholder Voice ℹ
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.35 2 perspectives
Speaks: institution
About: individualsmilitary_securitygovernment
Temporal Framing ℹ
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
present immediate
Geographic Scope ℹ
What geographic area does this content cover?
national
Haiti
Complexity ℹ
How accessible is this content to a general audience?
accessible low jargon general
Longitudinal 368 HN snapshots · 59 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 79 entries
2026-03-16 02:03 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.086 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-16 02:03 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.09 (Neutral) -0.03
2026-03-16 01:04 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.07) - -
2026-03-16 01:04 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.42 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-16 01:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.07 (Neutral) +0.21
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-16 01:04 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 1R - -
2026-03-16 00:53 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.48) - -
2026-03-16 00:53 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.63 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-16 00:53 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.48 (Moderate positive) 20,548 tokens +0.01
2026-03-16 00:51 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.47) - -
2026-03-16 00:51 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.62 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-16 00:51 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.47 (Moderate positive) 19,278 tokens -0.10
2026-03-16 00:51 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: 17W 17R - -
2026-03-15 23:17 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.57) - -
2026-03-15 23:17 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.72 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-15 23:17 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.57 (Moderate positive) 21,245 tokens
2026-03-15 23:17 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: 0W 12R - -
2026-03-15 22:57 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 22:57 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) +0.03
2026-03-15 22:10 eval_success Lite evaluated: Mild negative (-0.15) - -
2026-03-15 22:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) -0.20
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-15 22:10 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 1R - -
2026-03-15 18:11 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.086 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 18:11 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.09 (Neutral) 0.00
2026-03-15 17:43 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.05) - -
2026-03-15 17:43 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.05 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-15 17:43 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 1R - -
2026-03-15 16:49 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.086 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 16:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.09 (Neutral) +0.19
2026-03-15 16:31 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.05) - -
2026-03-15 16:31 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.05 (Neutral) +0.20
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 22:23 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) 0.00
2026-03-14 22:18 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 20:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) 0.00
2026-03-14 20:41 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 18:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 17:58 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) 0.00
2026-03-14 17:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) -0.20
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 16:25 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) -0.19
2026-03-14 16:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.05 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 11:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.05 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 11:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.09 (Neutral) +0.19
2026-03-14 11:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.05 (Neutral) +0.20
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 10:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) -0.19
2026-03-14 10:23 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) -0.20
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 10:11 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.09 (Neutral) +0.32
2026-03-14 09:43 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.05 (Neutral) +0.20
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 09:31 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.23 (Mild negative) -0.12
2026-03-14 09:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 08:48 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) 0.00
2026-03-14 08:25 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) -0.20
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 08:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) 0.00
2026-03-14 07:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.05 (Neutral) +0.20
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 07:23 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) -0.19
2026-03-14 07:03 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 06:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.09 (Neutral) +0.19
2026-03-14 06:24 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 05:59 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) 0.00
2026-03-14 05:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 05:18 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) 0.00
2026-03-14 05:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 04:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) -0.19
2026-03-14 04:25 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 04:00 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.09 (Neutral) +0.19
2026-03-14 03:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 03:20 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.11 (Mild negative) -0.19
2026-03-14 03:09 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 02:43 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.09 (Neutral) 0.00
2026-03-14 02:33 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 02:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.09 (Neutral) 0.00
2026-03-14 01:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) -0.20
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 01:22 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.09 (Neutral) +0.16
2026-03-14 01:14 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.05 (Neutral) +0.20
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 00:46 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.07 (Neutral) 0.00
2026-03-14 00:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,
2026-03-14 00:04 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.53 (Moderate negative)
2026-03-14 00:00 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.34 (Moderate positive)
reasoning
Condemns drone strikes, rights group
2026-03-13 23:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.07 (Neutral)
2026-03-13 23:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.15 (Mild negative)
reasoning
Editorial stance: condemning drone strikes, rights group involvement. Transparency: author not identified, date present,