+0.48 ICE agents reveal daily arrest quotas and surveillance app in court testimony (www.theguardian.com S:+0.00 )
98 points by mitchbob 2 days ago | 0 comments on HN | Mild positive Moderate agreement (3 models) Editorial · v3.7 · 2026-03-15 23:57:30 0
Summary Surveillance & Due Process Advocates
This Guardian investigation documents ICE agents' court testimony revealing daily arrest quotas (eight per agent) and use of surveillance technology for targeting, exposing systematic enforcement practices potentially violating due process and equal protection principles. The reporting advocates for government accountability and transparency regarding enforcement operations affecting immigrant communities, combining investigative disclosure with photographic documentation of protests. Structural elements present significant tension between the article's pro-transparency editorial stance and the domain's extensive third-party tracking infrastructure and absence of consent mechanisms.
Rights Tensions 3 pairs
Art 12 ↔ Art 19 — Article emphasizes government surveillance as violation of privacy (Article 12) while site structure implements extensive third-party tracking contradicting privacy advocacy, creating tension between editorial message and platform implementation regarding freedom of information (Article 19).
Art 5 ↔ Art 3 — Article advocates protection against inhumane enforcement practices (Article 5) while quota system documented prioritizes numerical targets over individual security assessment, creating tension between institutional dignity protections and systemic enforcement practices affecting security of person (Article 3).
Art 14 ↔ Art 7 — Content implicitly supports asylum access rights (Article 14) by documenting enforcement targeting, but quota system creates unequal application of law through systematic rather than individualized enforcement decisions (Article 7).
Article Heatmap
Preamble: +0.37 — Preamble P Article 1: +0.45 — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: +0.40 — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: +0.43 — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: +0.27 — No Slavery 4 Article 5: +0.35 — No Torture 5 Article 6: +0.24 — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: +0.30 — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: +0.18 — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: +0.24 — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: +0.21 — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: +0.27 — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: +0.01 — Privacy 12 Article 13: +0.24 — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: +0.36 — Asylum 14 Article 15: +0.21 — Nationality 15 Article 16: +0.18 — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: +0.24 — Property 17 Article 18: +0.30 — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +0.12 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: +0.36 — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: +0.33 — Political Participation 21 Article 22: +0.24 — Social Security 22 Article 23: +0.30 — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: +0.24 — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: +0.24 — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: +0.37 — Education 26 Article 27: +0.32 — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: +0.38 — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: +0.33 — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: +0.30 — No Destruction of Rights 30
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
E
+0.48
S
+0.00
Weighted Mean +0.29 Unweighted Mean +0.28
Max +0.45 Article 1 Min +0.01 Article 12
Signal 31 No Data 0
Volatility 0.09 (Low)
Negative 0 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4
SETL ℹ +0.48 Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio ℹ 61% 70 facts · 45 inferences
Agreement Moderate 3 models · spread ±0.071
Evidence 56% coverage ℹ
7H 14M 10L
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.41 (3 articles) Security: 0.35 (3 articles) Legal: 0.24 (6 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.20 (4 articles) Personal: 0.24 (3 articles) Expression: 0.27 (3 articles) Economic & Social: 0.26 (4 articles) Cultural: 0.34 (2 articles) Order & Duties: 0.34 (3 articles)
Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.70
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Framing Coverage
Editorial
+0.70
SETL
+0.82

Article strongly advocates for freedom of expression and information by publicizing testimony about government enforcement operations. Frames court testimony as rare and significant, emphasizing value of disclosure. Coverage demonstrates commitment to free expression regarding government accountability.

+0.65
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
High Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.65
SETL
+0.57

Content directly addresses equal treatment under law by exposing differential enforcement practices (quotas based on arrest targets rather than individual circumstances). Highlights systemic inequality in application of immigration enforcement.

+0.60
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.60
SETL
+0.55

Article contextualizes ICE enforcement against immigrant populations, indirectly addressing non-discrimination by exposing practices that may disproportionately target national origin groups. Focuses on institutional practices without explicit discrimination analysis.

+0.60
Article 14 Asylum
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.60
SETL
+0.60

Article advocates for right to seek asylum by documenting enforcement targeting of undocumented immigrants. Frames enforcement quota system as systematic barrier to asylum access. Implicitly addresses right to seek refuge through documentation of enforcement practices.

+0.60
Article 20 Assembly & Association
High Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.60
SETL
+0.60

Article advocates for peaceful assembly by documenting government enforcement practices that restrict immigrant communities' ability to organize. Photograph includes anti-ICE protesters, signaling protection for peaceful assembly. Coverage supports freedom of assembly rights.

+0.60
Article 28 Social & International Order
High Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.60
SETL
+0.57

Article advocates for social and international order supporting human rights by exposing enforcement practices that may violate fundamental rights. Court testimony mechanism suggests reliance on legal order. Coverage frames accountability as essential to rights-respecting order.

+0.55
Preamble Preamble
High Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.55
SETL
+0.50

Article advocates for human dignity and recognition by exposing systemic practices (arrest quotas, surveillance) that undermine equal treatment and dignity of migrants. Framing emphasizes institutional failure to uphold fundamental rights.

+0.55
Article 5 No Torture
High Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.55
SETL
+0.52

Article advocates against arbitrary enforcement by exposing quota-based arrest system. Frames enforcement practices as contrary to human dignity by showing systematic rather than individualized decision-making. Implicitly addresses torture/cruel treatment through documentation of enforcement mechanisms.

+0.55
Article 21 Political Participation
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.55
SETL
+0.55

Article advocates for democratic participation indirectly by exposing government enforcement practices outside public scrutiny. Court testimony revelation frames transparency as democratic accountability mechanism. Coverage supports informed participation.

+0.55
Article 29 Duties to Community
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.55
SETL
+0.55

Article addresses duties to community by documenting enforcement practices that affect community welfare. Frames accountability journalism as community responsibility. Does not explicitly analyze duties but implicitly advocates for institutional accountability to community.

+0.50
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.39

Article documents government enforcement practices that may violate rights to security of person through indiscriminate targeting (quota-based arrest system). Does not explicitly address right to life but frames enforcement as systematic rather than protective.

+0.50
Article 7 Equality Before Law
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.50

Article addresses equal protection of law by documenting unequal enforcement through quota systems. Frames enforcement as systematic and numerical rather than individualized, raising equal protection concerns without explicit rights analysis.

+0.50
Article 12 Privacy
High Advocacy Framing Practice
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.65

Article advocates for privacy rights by exposing government surveillance apparatus (surveillance app for targeting). Documents systematic monitoring contrary to privacy protections. Frames surveillance as institutional practice requiring accountability.

+0.50
Article 18 Freedom of Thought
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.50

Article addresses freedom of thought/conscience/religion indirectly by documenting enforcement practices affecting immigrant communities, some of whom may face religious persecution. Does not explicitly analyze religious protection.

+0.50
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.50

Article addresses labor rights indirectly by documenting enforcement practices affecting undocumented workers. Quota system may create incentives for arbitrary targeting of working immigrants. Does not explicitly analyze labor exploitation.

+0.50
Article 26 Education
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.47

Article addresses education rights indirectly by documenting enforcement practices in communities including families and children. Does not explicitly analyze education access but frames enforcement impact on vulnerable populations.

+0.50
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.47

Article addresses cultural participation indirectly by documenting enforcement practices affecting immigrant communities' ability to participate in cultural and community life. Does not explicitly analyze cultural rights.

+0.50
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.50

Article addresses interpretation of rights by documenting enforcement practices that may exceed legal authority. Court testimony suggests interpretation of enforcement scope. Does not explicitly analyze rights interpretation limits.

+0.45
Article 4 No Slavery
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.45
SETL
+0.45

Article indirectly addresses slavery/servitude by documenting enforcement practices that trap populations in irregular status, limiting economic freedom. Does not explicitly frame slavery issue.

+0.45
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.45
SETL
+0.45

Article addresses presumption of innocence indirectly by documenting enforcement that presumes guilt through quota-based targeting. Frames enforcement as contrary to individual assessment principles.

+0.40
Article 6 Legal Personhood
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
+0.40

Article does not explicitly address right to recognition as person before law, though documentation of enforcement practices implicitly questions institutional recognition of migrants' legal status.

+0.40
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
+0.40

Article documents enforcement targeting practices that may constitute arbitrary detention through quota-based arrest system. Does not explicitly analyze arbitrary detention but frames practices as systematic rather than justified.

+0.40
Article 13 Freedom of Movement
Low
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
+0.40

Article does not explicitly address freedom of movement or right to leave/return to country.

+0.40
Article 17 Property
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
+0.40

Article does not directly address property rights, though enforcement practices may affect undocumented immigrants' ability to hold property.

+0.40
Article 22 Social Security
Low
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
+0.40

Article does not directly address social security or welfare rights, though enforcement practices may affect access to social services.

+0.40
Article 24 Rest & Leisure
Low
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
+0.40

Article does not directly address rest/leisure rights.

+0.40
Article 25 Standard of Living
Low
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
+0.40

Article does not address health or standard of living rights explicitly, though enforcement practices may affect access to healthcare.

+0.35
Article 10 Fair Hearing
Low
Editorial
+0.35
SETL
+0.35

Article does not address fair trial or judicial independence explicitly, though court testimony format implies judicial proceedings.

+0.35
Article 15 Nationality
Low
Editorial
+0.35
SETL
+0.35

Article does not address nationality rights explicitly.

+0.30
Article 8 Right to Remedy
Low
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
+0.30

Article does not directly address right to effective remedy, though court testimony mechanism suggests access to judicial process.

+0.30
Article 16 Marriage & Family
Low
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
+0.30

Article does not address marriage or family rights.
Structural Channel
What the site does
Element Modifier Affects Note
br_tracking -0.20
Preamble ¶5 Article 12 Article 19
13 tracker domain(s): www3.doubleclick.net, sb.scorecardresearch.com, securepubads.g.doubleclick.net, www.googleadservices.com, googleads.g.doubleclick.net...
br_security +0.05
Article 3 Article 12
Security headers: HTTPS, HSTS, CSP
br_accessibility +0.05
Article 26 Article 27 ¶1
Accessibility: lang attr, skip nav, 100% alt text
br_consent 0.00
Article 12 Article 19 Article 20 ¶2
No cookie consent banner detected
+0.20
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.20
Context Modifier
+0.05
SETL
+0.39

Security measures (HTTPS, CSP) present at structural level; domain context modifier notes +0.05 for security headers.

+0.15
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
High Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.15
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.57

Site structure does not prevent equal access to reporting; however, third-party tracking may differentially impact privacy of vulnerable populations if data shared.

+0.10
Preamble Preamble
High Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.10
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.50

Site structure includes tracking mechanisms (13 tracker domains) that limit user privacy, partially offsetting editorial message. Security headers present.

+0.10
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.10
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.55

Site tracking infrastructure does not explicitly discriminate but may create differential privacy impacts.

+0.05
Article 5 No Torture
High Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.05
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.52

Site security infrastructure provides baseline protection; domain tracking creates potential vulnerability exposure.

+0.05
Article 26 Education
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.05
Context Modifier
+0.05
SETL
+0.47

Domain implements accessibility measures (lang attr, skip nav, 100% alt text) per DCP (+0.05 modifier affects Article 26). This supports access to informational content.

+0.05
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.05
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.47

Domain accessibility infrastructure (+0.05) supports access to cultural information and community resources through enhanced access.

+0.05
Article 28 Social & International Order
High Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.05
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.57

Domain security infrastructure (+0.05) supports trustworthy information environment. Tracking infrastructure (-0.2) creates structural tension with rights-respecting order.

0.00
Article 4 No Slavery
Medium Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.45

No observable structural signals regarding Article 4.

0.00
Article 6 Legal Personhood
Low Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.40

No observable structural signals regarding Article 6.

0.00
Article 7 Equality Before Law
Medium Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.50

No observable structural signals regarding Article 7.

0.00
Article 8 Right to Remedy
Low
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.30

No observable structural signals regarding Article 8.

0.00
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention
Medium Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.40

No observable structural signals regarding Article 9.

0.00
Article 10 Fair Hearing
Low
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.35

No observable structural signals regarding Article 10.

0.00
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence
Medium Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.45

No observable structural signals regarding Article 11.

0.00
Article 13 Freedom of Movement
Low
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.40

No observable structural signals regarding Article 13.

0.00
Article 14 Asylum
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.60

No observable structural signals regarding Article 14.

0.00
Article 15 Nationality
Low
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.35

No observable structural signals regarding Article 15.

0.00
Article 16 Marriage & Family
Low
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.30

No observable structural signals regarding Article 16.

0.00
Article 17 Property
Low Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.40

No observable structural signals regarding Article 17.

0.00
Article 18 Freedom of Thought
Medium Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.50

No observable structural signals regarding Article 18.

0.00
Article 20 Assembly & Association
High Advocacy Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.60

No observable structural signals regarding Article 20.

0.00
Article 21 Political Participation
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.55

No observable structural signals regarding Article 21.

0.00
Article 22 Social Security
Low
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.40

No observable structural signals regarding Article 22.

0.00
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Medium Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.50

No observable structural signals regarding Article 23.

0.00
Article 24 Rest & Leisure
Low
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.40

No observable structural signals regarding Article 24.

0.00
Article 25 Standard of Living
Low
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.40

No observable structural signals regarding Article 25.

0.00
Article 29 Duties to Community
Medium Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.55

No observable structural signals regarding Article 29.

0.00
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights
Medium Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.50

No observable structural signals regarding Article 30.

-0.25
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Framing Coverage
Structural
-0.25
Context Modifier
-0.20
SETL
+0.82

Structural conflict: domain implements extensive tracking (-0.2 modifier affects Article 19) and no consent mechanism (0 modifier). Security headers provide minimal offset. Editorial freedom is compromised by surveillance infrastructure.

-0.35
Article 12 Privacy
High Advocacy Framing Practice
Structural
-0.35
Context Modifier
-0.15
SETL
+0.65

Structural signals conflict sharply: domain tracking modifier -0.2 affects Article 12 directly (13 tracker domains including doubleclick, scorecardresearch, googleads). No cookie consent banner detected (modifier 0). Combined effect substantially reduces structural score despite HTTPS/security measures.
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean. Learn more
Epistemic Quality ℹ
How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.74 medium claims
Sources
0.8
Evidence
0.7
Uncertainty
0.7
Purpose
0.8
Propaganda Flags ℹ
2 manipulative rhetoric techniques found
2 techniques detected
appeal to fear
Headline and standfirst emphasize systematic surveillance app and arrest quotas, potentially designed to alarm readers about enforcement practices.
loaded language
Term 'rare court testimony' and emphasis on revelation of arrest quotas use evaluative framing suggesting institutional abnormality or wrongdoing.
Emotional Tone ℹ
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
urgent
Valence
-0.6
Arousal
0.7
Dominance
0.4
Transparency ℹ
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.50
✓ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience
Solution Orientation ℹ
Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.41 problem only
Reader Agency
0.3
Stakeholder Voice ℹ
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.45 3 perspectives
Speaks: governmentinstitution
About: marginalizedcommunity
Temporal Framing ℹ
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
present immediate
Geographic Scope ℹ
What geographic area does this content cover?
national
Portland, Oregon, United States
Complexity ℹ
How accessible is this content to a general audience?
accessible low jargon general
Longitudinal 138 HN snapshots · 66 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 86 entries
2026-03-15 23:57 eval_success Evaluated: Mild positive (0.29) - -
2026-03-15 23:57 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.29 (Mild positive) 20,264 tokens -0.09
2026-03-15 23:57 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: 0W 1R - -
2026-03-15 23:53 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.38) - -
2026-03-15 23:53 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.38 (Moderate positive) 18,868 tokens
2026-03-15 23:53 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: 0W 11R - -
2026-03-15 18:13 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 18:13 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 17:48 eval_success Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.15) - -
2026-03-15 17:48 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-15 17:48 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R - -
2026-03-15 16:51 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 16:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-15 16:34 eval_success Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.15) - -
2026-03-15 16:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-15 16:34 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R - -
2026-03-14 22:40 eval_success Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.15) - -
2026-03-14 22:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 22:40 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R - -
2026-03-14 21:39 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-14 21:39 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 21:29 eval_success Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.15) - -
2026-03-14 21:29 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 21:29 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R - -
2026-03-14 20:22 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-14 20:22 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 20:13 eval_success Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.15) - -
2026-03-14 20:13 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R - -
2026-03-14 20:13 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 19:09 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-14 19:09 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-14 18:50 eval_success Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.15) - -
2026-03-14 18:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 17:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 17:13 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 16:23 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 16:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 13:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 13:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-14 12:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 12:29 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-14 12:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 11:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 11:29 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 11:14 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-14 10:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 10:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-14 10:14 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 09:59 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 09:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 09:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 08:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 08:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 08:11 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 07:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 07:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 07:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-14 06:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 06:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-14 06:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 05:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 05:31 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 05:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 04:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 04:24 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 04:14 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 03:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 03:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 03:06 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 02:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 02:25 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 02:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 01:46 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 01:39 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 01:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 01:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 00:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 00:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-14 00:18 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.06 (Neutral)
2026-03-14 00:15 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.27 (Mild positive)
reasoning
Investigative journalism exposing abuses
2026-03-13 23:41 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 23:35 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-13 22:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 22:31 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights
2026-03-13 21:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive)
2026-03-13 21:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive)
reasoning
Editorial stance discusses ICE agents' court testimony on arrest quotas and surveillance, implying concerns about rights