+0.09 Iran-Backed Hackers Claim Wiper Attack on Medtech Firm Stryker (krebsonsecurity.com S:+0.06 )
276 points by 2bluesc 3 days ago | 301 comments on HN | Moderate positive Contested Low agreement (3 models) Editorial · v3.7 · 2026-03-15 22:52:36 0
Summary Cybersecurity & Critical Infrastructure Acknowledges
This cybersecurity news article documents a data-wiping attack against medical device manufacturer Stryker attributed to Iran-backed hacktivist group Handala, affecting 79 countries and 200,000+ systems. The content strongly protects Article 19 (free expression) through rigorous independent journalism, multiple sourcing, and open access reporting, while also addressing privacy violations (Article 12), property damage (Article 17), and healthcare infrastructure disruption (Article 25). However, the reporting neglects labor rights implications for 5,000+ displaced workers, provides limited analysis of community responsibility in cybersecurity governance, and focuses on threat documentation rather than constructive solutions.
Rights Tensions 2 pairs
Art 12 ↔ Art 19 — Privacy violation (data exfiltration documented in Article 12) justified by attacker's manifesto invoking exposure and free information (Article 19), creating tension between information security and public disclosure.
Art 25 ↔ Art 12 — Healthcare system integrity (Article 25) threatened by cyber attack that also violates patient/institutional data privacy (Article 12), with critical infrastructure disruption forcing trade-offs between system availability and data protection.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: +0.43 — Preamble P Article 1: +0.37 — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: +0.31 — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: +0.40 — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: +0.28 — No Slavery 4 Article 5: +0.25 — No Torture 5 Article 6: +0.34 — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: +0.43 — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: +0.31 — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: +0.28 — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: +0.34 — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: +0.37 — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: +0.23 — Privacy 12 Article 13: +0.36 — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: +0.31 — Asylum 14 Article 15: +0.28 — Nationality 15 Article 16: +0.28 — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: +0.31 — Property 17 Article 18: +0.28 — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +1.00 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: +0.34 — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: +0.31 — Political Participation 21 Article 22: +0.37 — Social Security 22 Article 23: +0.31 — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: +0.28 — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: +0.57 — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: +0.34 — Education 26 Article 27: +0.49 — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: +0.40 — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: +0.28 — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: +0.25 — No Destruction of Rights 30
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
E
+0.09
S
+0.06
Weighted Mean +0.39 Unweighted Mean +0.36
Max +1.00 Article 19 Min +0.23 Article 12
Signal 31 No Data 0
Volatility 0.14 (Medium)
Negative 0 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4
SETL ℹ +0.04 Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio ℹ 66% 49 facts · 25 inferences
Agreement Low 3 models · spread ±0.191
Evidence 44% coverage ℹ
1H 9M 8L
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.37 (3 articles) Security: 0.31 (3 articles) Legal: 0.35 (6 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.29 (4 articles) Personal: 0.29 (3 articles) Expression: 0.55 (3 articles) Economic & Social: 0.38 (4 articles) Cultural: 0.42 (2 articles) Order & Duties: 0.31 (3 articles)
HN Discussion 20 top-level · 26 replies
bingogo 2026-03-12 04:27 UTC link
Medtech firms consistently underinvest in corporate network cybersecurity because almost all their security and compliance spending goes to device safety requirements, not IT hardening. This is exactly the kind of gap wiper attacks target.
marijan_div 2026-03-12 04:57 UTC link
Stryker is far more than ambulance gurneys. They’re one of the largest med-tech suppliers, with equipment in operating rooms, ICUs, and surgical departments everywhere.

If a wiper actually hit internal systems, the bigger concern isn’t consumer data but disruption to manufacturing, logistics, and hospital support. That kind of outage could ripple through a lot of hospitals pretty quickly.

camillomiller 2026-03-12 04:58 UTC link
Seems dire but hardly a supply chain disrupting attack. Stryker is a huge supplier but it not as if this will debilitate the medical supply chain completely. Seems like the hackers found a door they could kick open easily and then justified the action ex-post.
JonChesterfield 2026-03-12 04:59 UTC link
So gain access to a machine that can ask microsoft intune to eviscerate the company, ask it to do so, done. Bit of a shame all the machines had that installed really. Reminds me of crowdstrike.
Banditoz 2026-03-12 05:03 UTC link
Does InTune have some sort of check that goes "if over 1% of devices are wiped within a certain timeframe, stop all new device wipe requests"? Seems like it should be a feature, especially if these kinda attacks pick up.
bitwize 2026-03-12 05:18 UTC link
The "Fucking for Virginity" approach to infosec strikes again!
ChrisArchitect 2026-03-12 05:45 UTC link
Related:

Iran warns U.S. tech firms could become targets as war expands

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47341007

0x53 2026-03-12 06:13 UTC link
Never add your personal device to a companies MDM…
fnord77 2026-03-12 06:21 UTC link
That's a shame, they make impressive products
bawolff 2026-03-12 06:25 UTC link
So... did they have backups?

Wipe all data kind of seems like the best kind of cyberattack if you have backups. No data falling into wrong hands, no left behind rootkits, no ransome threats etc

renewiltord 2026-03-12 06:29 UTC link
They’ve been around for a while. Threat actors are something that I want our governments to be working on stopping. If they were capable, I would say we should run a government Project Zero but I doubt anyone would do long term service for $70k/yr when they could be making 10x-100x that.

Anyway, the bombings will have to continue till we rubble our enemies.

shevy-java 2026-03-12 06:43 UTC link
So their own faulty security is now blamed on others. That's not new.
mbix77 2026-03-12 10:22 UTC link
Killing 175 children would illicit such a response also from USA hackers.
srean 2026-03-12 11:07 UTC link
Patriot of Persia https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12202123-patriot-of-pers...

An important book to read.

So many people think this started with the islamic revolution of the 70s. The meddling goes further in time.

iJohnDoe 2026-03-12 13:42 UTC link
One irony here is that Stryker makes their partners and suppliers jump through so many cybersecurity hoops. I’m talking months and ridiculous demands. Then they get hacked themselves. They should have gotten their own shit together as well.
strict9 2026-03-12 14:05 UTC link
It appears personal devices were also impacted by this via Microsoft Intune. That app is presented to employees as a way to get their email/slack on their personal device without giving IT systems access to it.

IT systems around the country say that they have no access to your personal data and there they can only block access to Intune apps.

But the linked reddit thread[1] in this article notes personal devices getting wiped and locked out.

[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/1rqopq0/stry...

gatreddi 2026-03-12 14:27 UTC link
If Intune wiped personal devices that’s a serious failure. BYOD setups are supposed to wipe only the work container, not the whole phone. Either those devices were fully enrolled in MDM without people realizing or someone pushed the wrong wipe policy during incident response. Would be good to see confirmation from affected employees.
oytis 2026-03-12 14:31 UTC link
Hacktivists? Looks more like state actors.
akramachamarei 2026-03-12 15:12 UTC link
Astounding amount of censorship in these comments.
sieep 2026-03-13 02:07 UTC link
So frustrating that news from my area one here is ever positive. West Michigan has a booming tech scene right now and clearly companies like Stryker need talent. Its LCOL here and the jobs are there for tech.
selcuka 2026-03-12 05:02 UTC link
My understanding is that the aim was not to disrupt the supply chain but to harm the company itself.
FreakLegion 2026-03-12 05:03 UTC link
This was more likely an Intune admin getting phished. Intune has a built-in wipe action: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/intune/intune-service/remo....
duskdozer 2026-03-12 05:13 UTC link
If they're a primary regional supplier, it could have a huge impact. It doesn't have to break the entire country to matter.
LPisGood 2026-03-12 05:37 UTC link
Can you elaborate what you mean?

Are you referring to a paradigm where people make their systems less secure in the effort to make them more secure?

trhway 2026-03-12 06:01 UTC link
Well, time to dust off anti-drone defense systems. Today on NPR they talked that Iran plans to launch drones from ships into California.

https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/authorities-warn-of-p...

Fox News drone expert:

https://nypost.com/2026/03/11/us-news/iran-could-use-drones-...

mk89 2026-03-12 06:29 UTC link
Never use your personal device for work, you wanted to say, probably.
shiroiuma 2026-03-12 06:31 UTC link
The company should have known better than to trust their IT infrastructure to Microslop. This is their own fault.
jonstewart 2026-03-12 06:52 UTC link
We had a government agency working on stopping threat actors, the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, but then DOGE ruined it. Now it’s a shell.
sofixa 2026-03-12 07:26 UTC link
> No data falling into wrong hands, no left behind rootkits, no ransome threats etc

You won't necessarily be able to know that the data hasn't already been exfiltrated and that the backups aren't post-compromise. Or that by restoring the backup you won't get back to the state that allowed them to get in in the first place.

heraldgeezer 2026-03-12 08:31 UTC link
Everything is obvious in hindsight

And to be clear, SCCM and Intune is a gun.

MS will not stop you from blowing your foot off with the gun.

Remember https://www.itprotoday.com/windows-7/aggressive-configmgr-ba... ?

>During TechEd 2014, Emory University's IT department prepared and deployed Windows 7 upgrades to the campuses computers. If you've worked with ConfigMgr at all, you know that there are checks-and-balances that can be employed to ensure that only specifically targeted systems will receive an OS upgrade. In Emory University's case, the check-and-balance method failed and instead of delivering the upgrade to applicable computers, delivered Windows 7 to ALL computers including laptops, desktops, and even servers.

andmarios 2026-03-12 08:49 UTC link
This raises the question: Are mass layoffs less frequent than a company's MS administrator account getting hacked?
Dowry9092 2026-03-12 11:51 UTC link
Go and switch your suppliers my friends, talk to purchasing now.
DANmode 2026-03-12 14:09 UTC link
MDM enrollment has colloquially meant your device could be wiped for the security|incompetency of your firm for quite some time.
2bluesc 2026-03-12 14:18 UTC link
I believe Android Work profile[0] would have limited the damage to the work profile rather than also impact the personal profile on a personal device.

Does anyone know if this is correct?

[0] https://www.android.com/enterprise/work-profile/

stackskipton 2026-03-12 14:42 UTC link
Knowing InTune MDM setup, it has two modes, control a few apps or control entire phone. iOS will tell you during setup what's happening and I've been at plenty of companies where employees are told "It's just for our apps" but it's really full Device Control. $TwoCompaniesAgo tried that "It's just for our applications" but when I went to install it, iOS went "This is 100% full device control" and I rejected it.
mjlee 2026-03-12 14:54 UTC link
Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) MDM profiles typically don't allow personal data access outside of their sandbox, but they almost always include remote wipe capabilities.

iOS at least displays a very clear warning when you import the profile telling you exactly what it can do.

Not that this isn't awful, but it's good to be clear on what this can do when used within normal expectations.

mjlee 2026-03-12 14:57 UTC link
This isn't true for iOS at least. You can include device erase capabilities in the MDM profile without enrolling as a managed device.
GorbachevyChase 2026-03-12 18:40 UTC link
Microsoft keeps disappointing and chief technology officers keep paying them. Wasn’t Elon Musk supposed to prove you could vibe code their entire product line? What happened to all that?
GenerWork 2026-03-12 21:10 UTC link
That was my thought. This is 100% a state actor.
gravisultra 2026-03-12 22:10 UTC link
Zionists have been meddling in the Middle East since their ideology was created in the late 1800s.
mcoliver 2026-03-13 00:54 UTC link
Intune has two modes. Device registration and User registration. And two kinds of wipes, retire and wipe. Retire means only delete your work profile and is only available for User registration mdm. Sounds like Stryker didn't configure intune properly for byod to force users with personal devices to use User registration.

Beyond that there are so many other things in intune you can use to prevent this sort of thing. Short lived / JIT credentials with MFA, ip restrictions, multi admin approval, rbac (role based fine tuned permissions eg help desk can't wipe, only retire ) etc. sounds like there were some big misses here.

Also sounds like they were in the system long enough to exfiltrate 50+ TB of data without setting off alarm bells.

fakedang 2026-03-13 05:50 UTC link
Killing 175 children in the US would be called another Tuesday school shooting or something.

Also elicit.

expedition32 2026-03-13 13:05 UTC link
State actors can be activists. The inability for Americans to understand that has cost them wars.
thisislife2 2026-03-13 15:54 UTC link
Does it serve the US military?
Bluescreenbuddy 2026-03-13 17:52 UTC link
Thankfully we have CISA...Oh wait.
mapotofu 2026-03-14 11:20 UTC link
You can set dual authorization for resets, wipes, and deletes. Normally CISA would pipe in with this kind of guidance. Anyone know what they’re up to now?
Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.75
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Framing Practice
Editorial
+0.75
SETL
+0.27

Content exemplifies investigative journalism on cybersecurity with attribution to multiple sources (Palo Alto, New York Times, anonymous whistleblower, employee accounts, Reddit discussion), transparent methodology, and public interest framing. Reporting seeks and publishes information about threats to critical infrastructure and state accountability.

+0.45
Preamble Preamble
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.45
SETL
+0.15

Content frames a significant security incident affecting public health infrastructure, emphasizing transparency about malicious actors' claims and motivations while reporting on geopolitical tensions underlying the attack.

+0.45
Article 7 Equality Before Law
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.45
SETL
+0.15

Reporting emphasizes equal treatment under law by attributing accountability to state-linked actors (Iran) without exemption, documenting attack claims transparently, and supporting investigation of facts (New York Times attribution of missile strike responsibility).

+0.40
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
0.00

Reporting documents corporate infrastructure disruption and institutional continuity challenges, implicitly supporting organizational security and stability necessary for life and security.

+0.40
Article 25 Standard of Living
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
-0.15

Content documents attack on medical technology company providing surgical equipment and healthcare services globally, implying disruption to right to standard of living and health. Reporting frames threat to public health infrastructure.

+0.40
Article 28 Social & International Order
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
0.00

Content documents breach of organizational and institutional security order (data destruction, network compromise, infrastructure shutdown) supporting importance of social order for rights protection. Reporting implies need for institutional security frameworks.

+0.35
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.35
SETL
-0.14

Content treats diverse stakeholders (company, employees, security researchers, attackers) in reporting but does not explicitly frame around universal dignity or equal human worth.

+0.35
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.35
SETL
-0.14

Content implies presumption of innocence by reporting claims rather than established guilt; uses language like 'claiming' and 'said' rather than asserting culpability as proven fact.

+0.35
Article 22 Social Security
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.35
SETL
-0.14

Content implies right to social security by documenting impact on workers (5,000+ sent home, devices wiped, loss of network access to personal data) without framing workers' welfare or entitlements.

+0.35
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.35
SETL
-0.21

Content documents disruption to cultural and economic benefit of scientific/technology institution (Stryker's medical innovation role) without addressing cultural rights per se. Free access supports participation in information about scientific/technical threats.

+0.30
Article 6 Legal Personhood
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.20

Content implicitly affirms right to legal personhood by treating Stryker as accountable institutional actor and attributing agency to hacktivist group as identifiable entity.

+0.30
Article 10 Fair Hearing
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.20

Reporting describes fair and public attribution of attack responsibility through independent security research and documented investigation, supporting transparent accountability.

+0.30
Article 13 Freedom of Movement
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.26

Content reports on freedom of movement restriction (employees sent home from offices in 79 countries) as factual consequence of attack rather than normative commentary.

+0.30
Article 20 Assembly & Association
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.20

Content reports on hacktivist group's claimed political motivation (retaliation for missile strike) without endorsing or condemning political assembly per se, instead documenting stated intent.

+0.30
Article 26 Education
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.20

Content reports on cyberattack affecting global medical technology company, implying disruption to education/skill-dependent employment and institutional capacity. Does not directly address education.

+0.25
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
Low
Editorial
+0.25
SETL
-0.24

Content does not directly address rights of entry, employment, or nationality status.

+0.25
Article 8 Right to Remedy
Low
Editorial
+0.25
SETL
-0.24

Content does not address judicial remedies or legal standing.

+0.25
Article 14 Asylum
Low
Editorial
+0.25
SETL
-0.24

Content does not address asylum or refuge.

+0.25
Article 17 Property
Low
Editorial
+0.25
SETL
-0.24

Content does not address property rights protection, though attack involves destruction of company data assets.

+0.25
Article 21 Political Participation
Low
Editorial
+0.25
SETL
-0.24

Content does not address political participation or governance rights.

+0.25
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Low
Editorial
+0.25
SETL
-0.24

Content does not address work rights, conditions, or wages.

+0.20
Article 4 No Slavery
Low
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.28

Content does not address slavery or servitude.

+0.20
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention
Low
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.28

Content does not address arbitrary detention.

+0.20
Article 15 Nationality
Low
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.28

Content does not address nationality.

+0.20
Article 16 Marriage & Family
Low
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.28

Content does not address marriage or family rights.

+0.20
Article 18 Freedom of Thought
Low
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.28

Content does not address freedom of thought, conscience, or religion.

+0.20
Article 24 Rest & Leisure
Low
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.28

Content does not address rest or leisure.

+0.20
Article 29 Duties to Community
Low
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.28

Content does not address limitations on rights exercise or prohibition of activity aimed at destroying rights.

+0.15
Article 5 No Torture
Low
Editorial
+0.15
SETL
-0.32

Content does not directly address torture or cruel punishment.

+0.15
Article 12 Privacy
Medium
Editorial
+0.15
SETL
-0.26

Content does not directly address privacy protection; focuses on data destruction rather than data protection.

+0.15
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights
Low
Editorial
+0.15
SETL
-0.32

Content does not address interpretation or construction of UDHR rights.
Structural Channel
What the site does
Element Modifier Affects Note
Legal & Terms
Privacy +0.05
Article 12
No explicit privacy policy visible in provided content; standard WordPress/media site structure suggests data collection practices typical of news platforms.
Terms of Service —
Terms of service not accessible from provided content.
Identity & Mission
Mission +0.15
Article 19
Krebs on Security is known for investigative cybersecurity journalism; domain mission supports free expression and public information about security threats.
Editorial Code +0.10
Article 19
Content demonstrates journalistic standards: attributed sources, multiple corroborating reports, anonymization of sensitive sources.
Ownership +0.05
Article 19
Independent security journalist; no apparent corporate ownership constraints limiting editorial independence.
Access & Distribution
Access Model +0.10
Article 25 Article 27
Content freely accessible with no paywall; supports public access to security information.
Ad/Tracking -0.05
Article 12
Standard ad infrastructure present; likely includes third-party tracking cookies typical of ad-supported news sites.
Accessibility +0.05
Article 25
Standard WordPress accessibility features present; no barriers to information access observed.
+0.65
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Framing Practice
Structural
+0.65
Context Modifier
+0.30
SETL
+0.27

Site operates as independent journalistic platform with free public access, no paywall, and editorial independence (DCP notes independent ownership, mission aligned with free expression, journalistic standards). Access model modifier (+0.1) and editorial code modifier (+0.1) support structural positive.

+0.45
Article 13 Freedom of Movement
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.45
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.26

Site freely distributes information across borders without access restrictions.

+0.45
Article 25 Standard of Living
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.45
Context Modifier
+0.15
SETL
-0.15

Site maintains accessibility standards (DCP modifier +0.05) and free access model (+0.1) supporting information access for public health understanding.

+0.45
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.45
Context Modifier
+0.10
SETL
-0.21

Free, unpaywalled access to information about medical technology threats supports participatory benefit. Access model modifier (+0.1) applies.

+0.40
Preamble Preamble
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.15

Site freely publishes investigative security reporting without access barriers, supporting public awareness of threats to critical infrastructure and institutional accountability.

+0.40
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.14

Open access site treats all readers equally without discrimination in information access.

+0.40
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.24

Site maintains standard access without discrimination.

+0.40
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
0.00

Site operates as stable journalistic institution providing reliable information.

+0.40
Article 4 No Slavery
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.28

Site contains no indicators of labor exploitation.

+0.40
Article 5 No Torture
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.32

Site operates without indicators of coercion.

+0.40
Article 6 Legal Personhood
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.20

Site recognizes and documents institutional and group identities.

+0.40
Article 7 Equality Before Law
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.15

Site functions as independent voice documenting institutional and state accountability without apparent political bias.

+0.40
Article 8 Right to Remedy
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.24

Site provides information platform but not legal recourse mechanism.

+0.40
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.28

Site contains no detention mechanisms.

+0.40
Article 10 Fair Hearing
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.20

Site operates as public record of documented incidents and research findings.

+0.40
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.14

Site documents claims and evidence without preemptive judgment.

+0.40
Article 14 Asylum
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.24

Site contains no asylum mechanisms.

+0.40
Article 15 Nationality
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.28

Site treats users equally regardless of nationality.

+0.40
Article 16 Marriage & Family
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.28

Site contains no family-related content.

+0.40
Article 17 Property
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.24

Site has no property ownership enforcement role.

+0.40
Article 18 Freedom of Thought
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.28

Site does not restrict ideological expression.

+0.40
Article 20 Assembly & Association
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.20

Site permits discussion of political motivations and actor claims.

+0.40
Article 21 Political Participation
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.24

Site has no governance participation role.

+0.40
Article 22 Social Security
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.14

Site provides information resource supporting public understanding of threats to employment and institutional stability.

+0.40
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.24

Site has no employment practice role.

+0.40
Article 24 Rest & Leisure
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.28

Site contains no leisure content.

+0.40
Article 26 Education
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.20

Site supports public information access and digital literacy regarding cybersecurity threats.

+0.40
Article 28 Social & International Order
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
0.00

Site functions as documentation of institutional vulnerabilities supporting public awareness of security framework gaps.

+0.40
Article 29 Duties to Community
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.28

Site does not restrict content based on rights-limiting doctrines.

+0.40
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights
Low
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.32

Site contains no UDHR interpretation.

+0.35
Article 12 Privacy
Medium
Structural
+0.35
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.26

Site likely uses standard ad-supported platform tracking (domain modifier: -0.05 for ad tracking).
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean. Learn more
Epistemic Quality ℹ
How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.74 medium claims
Sources
0.8
Evidence
0.7
Uncertainty
0.7
Purpose
0.8
Propaganda Flags ℹ
2 manipulative rhetoric techniques found
2 techniques detected
appeal to fear
Extensive documentation of global attack scale (79 countries, 200,000+ systems) and dramatic disruption (5,000 workers sent home, complete system shutdown) creates alarm without discussing defensive measures or resolution pathways.
loaded language
Repeated use of 'wiper attack,' 'data-wiping,' 'erased data,' 'forced to shut down' emphasizes destructive impact with emotionally charged terminology without neutral alternatives.
Emotional Tone ℹ
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
urgent
Valence
-0.6
Arousal
0.8
Dominance
0.3
Transparency ℹ
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.30
✗ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience
Solution Orientation ℹ
Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.35 problem only
Reader Agency
0.3
Stakeholder Voice ℹ
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.45 4 perspectives
Speaks: institutioncorporationindividualsgovernment
About: workersmarginalized
Temporal Framing ℹ
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
present immediate
Geographic Scope ℹ
What geographic area does this content cover?
global
Michigan, United States, Ireland, Iran, Israel, Jordan
Complexity ℹ
How accessible is this content to a general audience?
moderate medium jargon general
Longitudinal 895 HN snapshots · 227 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 247 entries
2026-03-16 00:48 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-16 00:48 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-16 00:44 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.01) - -
2026-03-16 00:44 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.38 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-16 00:44 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.01 (Neutral) -0.15
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 22:56 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.39) - -
2026-03-15 22:56 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.39 (Moderate positive) 17,932 tokens +0.25
2026-03-15 22:52 eval_success Evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) - -
2026-03-15 22:52 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.13 (Mild positive) 18,109 tokens
2026-03-15 22:25 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 22:25 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-15 21:55 eval_success Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.16) - -
2026-03-15 21:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 21:55 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-15 18:08 eval_success Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.16) - -
2026-03-15 18:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 18:08 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-15 17:49 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 17:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-15 16:54 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (-0.02) - -
2026-03-15 16:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 15:54 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 15:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-15 15:50 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (-0.02) - -
2026-03-15 15:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 15:14 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 15:14 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 15:12 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (-0.02) - -
2026-03-15 15:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 14:37 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 14:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-15 14:37 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (-0.02) - -
2026-03-15 14:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 13:36 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 13:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-15 13:18 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (-0.02) - -
2026-03-15 13:18 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 12:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 12:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 12:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 12:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 11:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-15 11:13 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 10:48 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 10:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 10:06 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-15 09:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 09:25 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 09:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 08:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-15 08:29 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 08:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 07:46 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 07:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 07:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 06:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-15 06:30 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 06:00 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-15 05:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 05:24 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-15 05:20 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 04:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 04:44 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 04:11 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-15 04:09 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 03:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-15 03:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-15 00:43 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 00:41 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 23:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 23:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 22:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 22:53 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 21:53 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 21:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 20:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 20:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 19:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 19:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 18:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 18:33 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 17:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 16:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 15:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 15:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 15:06 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 15:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 14:29 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 14:25 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-14 13:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 13:46 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-14 13:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 13:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 12:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 12:31 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 12:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 11:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 11:28 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 11:19 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 10:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 10:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-14 10:15 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 10:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 09:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 09:22 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-14 08:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 08:39 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-14 08:14 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 07:57 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-14 07:35 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 07:14 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 06:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 06:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 06:15 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 05:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 05:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 05:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 04:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 04:30 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 04:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 03:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 03:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 03:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 02:57 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 02:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 02:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 01:59 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 01:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 01:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-14 01:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-14 00:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-14 00:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 23:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 23:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 22:59 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-13 22:27 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 21:43 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 21:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 20:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 19:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 18:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 18:27 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 17:35 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 16:58 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 16:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 15:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 15:33 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 15:13 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 14:53 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-13 14:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 14:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 13:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 13:28 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-13 13:20 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 12:53 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 12:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 12:18 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-13 12:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 11:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 11:30 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 11:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 10:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 10:25 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-13 10:13 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 09:46 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-13 09:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 09:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 08:53 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 08:30 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-13 08:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 07:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-13 07:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 07:06 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-13 06:57 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 06:27 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-13 06:20 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 05:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 05:44 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 05:15 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 05:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 04:39 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-13 04:31 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 04:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-13 03:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 03:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-13 03:21 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 02:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 02:46 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 02:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-13 02:11 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 01:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 01:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 01:13 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 01:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 00:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-13 00:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-13 00:15 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.21 (Mild positive)
2026-03-13 00:11 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.14 (Mild positive)
reasoning
Cybersecurity report on Iran-backed hackers
2026-03-12 23:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 23:24 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 22:21 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 22:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-12 21:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 21:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 21:11 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 21:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-12 20:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 20:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-12 19:35 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 18:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 18:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 17:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 16:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 15:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 15:18 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 14:15 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 13:59 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 13:30 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 13:19 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 12:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 12:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 12:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-12 12:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 11:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-12 11:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 11:29 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 11:24 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 11:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 10:53 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 09:53 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-12 09:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 09:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 08:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 08:27 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 08:22 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 07:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-12 07:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 07:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 07:11 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 06:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00
2026-03-12 06:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 06:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.16
2026-03-12 06:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) +0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 05:29 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-12 05:27 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) -0.18
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion
2026-03-12 04:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive)
2026-03-12 04:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive)
reasoning
Investigative journalism on cyber attack, no explicit rights discussion