+0.47 TCXO Failure Analysis (serd.es S:+0.45 )
108 points by zdw 8 days ago | 46 comments on HN | Moderate positive Contested Low agreement (3 models) Editorial · v3.7 · 2026-03-16 01:08:29 0
Summary Free Expression & Scientific Knowledge Advocates
A personal technical blog post documenting detailed hardware failure analysis of a TCXO oscillator component. The content advocates for scientific transparency and open knowledge-sharing by publishing investigative methodology and findings freely, supporting Article 19 (free expression) and Article 26/27 (education and participation in scientific progress). The author's commitment to transparent documentation and community engagement reflects advocacy for unrestricted technical discourse.
Rights Tensions 1 pair
Art 19 ↔ Art 26 — Open technical publication maximizes freedom of information but assumes technical literacy, limiting equitable access to scientific knowledge for those lacking specialized electronics background.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: ND — Preamble Preamble: No Data — Preamble P Article 1: ND — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood Article 1: No Data — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: ND — Non-Discrimination Article 2: No Data — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: ND — Life, Liberty, Security Article 3: No Data — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: ND — No Slavery Article 4: No Data — No Slavery 4 Article 5: ND — No Torture Article 5: No Data — No Torture 5 Article 6: ND — Legal Personhood Article 6: No Data — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: ND — Equality Before Law Article 7: No Data — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: ND — Right to Remedy Article 8: No Data — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: ND — No Arbitrary Detention Article 9: No Data — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: ND — Fair Hearing Article 10: No Data — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: ND — Presumption of Innocence Article 11: No Data — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: ND — Privacy Article 12: No Data — Privacy 12 Article 13: ND — Freedom of Movement Article 13: No Data — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: ND — Asylum Article 14: No Data — Asylum 14 Article 15: ND — Nationality Article 15: No Data — Nationality 15 Article 16: ND — Marriage & Family Article 16: No Data — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: ND — Property Article 17: No Data — Property 17 Article 18: ND — Freedom of Thought Article 18: No Data — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +0.74 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: ND — Assembly & Association Article 20: No Data — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: ND — Political Participation Article 21: No Data — Political Participation 21 Article 22: ND — Social Security Article 22: No Data — Social Security 22 Article 23: ND — Work & Equal Pay Article 23: No Data — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: ND — Rest & Leisure Article 24: No Data — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: ND — Standard of Living Article 25: No Data — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: +0.31 — Education 26 Article 27: +0.58 — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: ND — Social & International Order Article 28: No Data — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: ND — Duties to Community Article 29: No Data — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: ND — No Destruction of Rights Article 30: No Data — No Destruction of Rights 30
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
E
+0.47
S
+0.45
Weighted Mean +0.57 Unweighted Mean +0.54
Max +0.74 Article 19 Min +0.31 Article 26
Signal 3 No Data 28
Volatility 0.18 (Medium)
Negative 0 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4
SETL ℹ +0.03 Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio ℹ 59% 13 facts · 9 inferences
Agreement Low 3 models · spread ±0.404
Evidence 7% coverage ℹ
1H 2M 28 ND
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.00 (0 articles) Security: 0.00 (0 articles) Legal: 0.00 (0 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.00 (0 articles) Personal: 0.00 (0 articles) Expression: 0.74 (1 articles) Economic & Social: 0.00 (0 articles) Cultural: 0.44 (2 articles) Order & Duties: 0.00 (0 articles)
Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.55
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.55
SETL
-0.25

Content advocates for open technical documentation, scientific transparency, and independent hardware analysis. Author publicly shares detailed findings and invites community engagement ('Drop me a comment on Mastodon'). Technical analysis published freely without paywalls or restrictions supports freedom to seek, receive, and impart information.

+0.50
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.16

Content documents participation in scientific and technological advancement through independent hardware failure analysis. Author contributes to broader electronics engineering knowledge base through transparent documentation of investigation methodology and findings. Emphasis on open hardware (ThunderScope) and sharing technical discoveries supports cultural participation in scientific progress.

+0.35
Article 26 Education
Medium Advocacy
Editorial
+0.35
SETL
+0.19

Content promotes scientific and technical education through detailed hardware analysis documentation. Author demonstrates advanced electronics knowledge and teaches readers through step-by-step failure analysis methodology, inviting learning and inquiry. Emphasis on empirical investigation and transparency supports education in scientific method.

ND
Preamble Preamble

Preamble principles of dignity, equality, and freedom not directly addressed in technical hardware analysis.

ND
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood

Content does not engage with concepts of inherent dignity or equality of all humans.

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination

Technical hardware analysis does not address discrimination or protected characteristics.

ND
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security

Content does not engage with right to life, liberty, or personal security.

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

No slavery or servitude issues present.

ND
Article 5 No Torture

No torture or cruel treatment addressed.

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood

No right to recognition as person before law addressed.

ND
Article 7 Equality Before Law

No equal protection before law issues present.

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy

No effective remedy or judicial access discussed.

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

No arbitrary arrest or detention addressed.

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing

No fair trial or impartial hearing addressed.

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

No criminal law or presumption of innocence addressed.

ND
Article 12 Privacy

No privacy or correspondence issues present.

ND
Article 13 Freedom of Movement

No movement or residence restrictions discussed.

ND
Article 14 Asylum

No asylum or nationality issues addressed.

ND
Article 15 Nationality

No nationality or statelessness addressed.

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

No marriage or family rights addressed.

ND
Article 17 Property

No property rights issues discussed.

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought

No conscience, thought, or belief restrictions addressed.

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association

No freedom of assembly or association explicitly addressed.

ND
Article 21 Political Participation

No political participation or governance addressed.

ND
Article 22 Social Security

No social security or economic rights directly addressed.

ND
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay

No employment or labor rights addressed.

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

No rest, leisure, or working hours addressed.

ND
Article 25 Standard of Living

No health, food, housing, or medical care addressed.

ND
Article 28 Social & International Order

No social and international order addressed.

ND
Article 29 Duties to Community

No community duties explicitly addressed, though implicit in responsible technical documentation.

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

No interpretation or limitation clause concerns.
Structural Channel
What the site does
Element Modifier Affects Note
Legal & Terms
Privacy —
No privacy policy accessible; personal technical blog with limited data collection signals.
Terms of Service —
No terms of service visible; personal blog context.
Identity & Mission
Mission +0.10
Article 19 Article 27
Personal hardware analysis and open documentation ethos evident; supports freedom of expression and scientific inquiry.
Editorial Code —
No explicit editorial code; personal technical blog.
Ownership —
Individual author; no corporate ownership signals.
Access & Distribution
Access Model +0.05
Article 19 Article 26
Open-access technical content; freely available to all readers; supports information access rights.
Ad/Tracking —
No advertising or tracking mechanisms observed.
Accessibility -0.05
Article 26
Technical blog with substantial image content and technical diagrams; no alt-text observed; may limit accessibility for visually impaired readers of technical content.
+0.65
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.65
Context Modifier
+0.15
SETL
-0.25

Site provides open-access technical blog; no paywalls, registration barriers, or censorship mechanisms observed. Content freely discoverable and shareable. Author actively solicits feedback and engages community on Mastodon. Access model reinforces freedom of information and open scientific discourse.

+0.45
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.45
Context Modifier
+0.10
SETL
+0.16

Freely shared technical analysis contributes to collective scientific knowledge. However, specialized nature and lack of formal publication channels limit reach within institutional scientific communities. Content exists outside traditional peer-review structures.

+0.25
Article 26 Education
Medium Advocacy
Structural
+0.25
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.19

Open-access technical blog removes barriers to learning hardware analysis and electronics engineering. However, content assumes moderate technical knowledge and lacks explicit educational scaffolding for novices. No structured curriculum or accessibility features for learners with varying technical backgrounds observed.

ND
Preamble Preamble

Site structure does not directly reflect or undermine preamble commitments.

ND
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood

No structural signals related to equal treatment or dignity.

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination

No structural discrimination observed.

ND
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 5 No Torture

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 7 Equality Before Law

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 12 Privacy

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 13 Freedom of Movement

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 14 Asylum

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 15 Nationality

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 17 Property

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association

Comments section reference suggests acceptance of community interaction but content itself does not substantively engage with assembly rights.

ND
Article 21 Political Participation

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 22 Social Security

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 25 Standard of Living

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 28 Social & International Order

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 29 Duties to Community

No relevant structural signals.

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

No relevant structural signals.
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean. Learn more
Epistemic Quality ℹ
How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.81 medium claims
Sources
0.8
Evidence
0.8
Uncertainty
0.8
Purpose
0.8
Propaganda Flags ℹ
No manipulative rhetoric detected
0 techniques detected
Emotional Tone ℹ
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
measured
Valence
+0.3
Arousal
0.5
Dominance
0.6
Transparency ℹ
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.67
✓ Author ✗ Conflicts
More signals: context, framing & audience
Solution Orientation ℹ
Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.66 solution oriented
Reader Agency
0.7
Stakeholder Voice ℹ
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.45 3 perspectives
Speaks: individuals
About: corporationinstitution
Temporal Framing ℹ
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
retrospective historical
Geographic Scope ℹ
What geographic area does this content cover?
unspecified
Complexity ℹ
How accessible is this content to a general audience?
technical high jargon domain specific
Longitudinal 215 HN snapshots · 112 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 132 entries
2026-03-16 03:47 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-16 03:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-16 03:45 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-16 03:45 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.57 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-16 03:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-16 03:45 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-16 01:08 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.57) - -
2026-03-16 01:08 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.57 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-16 01:08 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.57 (Moderate positive) 13,766 tokens
2026-03-11 22:19 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-11 22:19 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 21:50 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-11 21:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 21:50 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-11 20:57 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-11 20:57 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 20:31 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-11 20:31 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 20:31 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-11 19:32 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-11 19:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 19:04 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-11 19:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 19:04 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-11 18:21 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-11 18:21 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 17:54 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-11 17:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 17:54 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-11 17:04 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-11 17:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 16:39 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-11 16:39 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 15:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 15:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 14:15 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 13:57 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 13:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 12:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 12:19 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 12:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 11:41 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 11:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 11:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 11:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 10:27 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 10:23 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 09:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 09:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 08:53 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 08:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 08:15 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 08:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 07:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 07:35 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 07:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 06:58 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 06:30 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 06:22 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 05:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 05:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 05:20 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 05:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 04:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 03:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 03:28 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 02:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 02:11 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 01:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 01:24 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-11 01:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 00:34 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.20 (Mild positive)
2026-03-11 00:31 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.24 (Mild negative)
reasoning
Technical content, zero rights discussion
2026-03-10 23:59 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 23:15 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 22:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 22:39 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 22:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 22:21 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 21:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 21:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 21:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 21:27 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 21:15 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 21:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 20:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 20:44 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 20:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 20:09 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 19:58 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 19:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 19:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 19:30 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 19:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 19:09 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 18:58 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 18:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 18:23 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 18:13 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 18:03 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 17:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 17:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 17:18 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 17:00 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 16:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 16:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 16:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 15:58 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 15:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 15:23 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 14:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 14:48 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 14:19 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 14:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 13:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 13:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 13:11 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 13:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 12:39 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 12:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 12:23 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 12:19 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 12:14 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 12:06 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 11:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 11:50 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 11:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 11:33 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 11:22 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 11:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion
2026-03-10 11:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive)
2026-03-10 11:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral)
reasoning
Technical analysis of TCXO failure, no human rights discussion