| 2026-03-02 23:22 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.44) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 23:22 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Exposing surveillance abuse |
| 2026-03-02 23:06 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.56) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 23:06 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance against biometric surveillance |
| 2026-03-02 23:01 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.56) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 23:01 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) -0.04 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance against biometric surveillance |
| 2026-03-02 22:45 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.44) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 22:45 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.44 (Moderate positive) +0.04 | |
| reasoning Exposing surveillance abuse |
| 2026-03-02 22:17 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 22:17 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance against biometric surveillance |
| 2026-03-02 22:07 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.40) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 22:07 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Exposing surveillance abuse |
| 2026-03-02 21:36 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 21:36 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance against biometric surveillance |
| 2026-03-02 21:29 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.40) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 21:29 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) +0.20 | |
| reasoning Exposing surveillance abuse |
| 2026-03-02 20:55 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 20:55 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance against biometric surveillance |
| 2026-03-02 20:45 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.20) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 20:45 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.20 (Mild positive) -0.20 | |
| reasoning Exposing surveillance abuse |
| 2026-03-02 20:04 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 20:04 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance against biometric surveillance |
| 2026-03-02 19:59 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 19:59 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance against biometric surveillance |
| 2026-03-02 19:59 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.40) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 19:59 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) +0.20 | |
| reasoning Exposing surveillance abuse |
| 2026-03-02 19:53 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.20) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 19:53 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.20 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Exposing surveillance abuse |
| 2026-03-02 19:22 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 19:22 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance against biometric surveillance |
| 2026-03-02 19:17 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 19:17 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) | |
| reasoning Editorial stance against biometric surveillance |
| 2026-03-02 19:15 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.20) | - - |
| 2026-03-02 19:15 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.20 (Mild positive) | |
| reasoning Exposing surveillance abuse |