Model Comparison
Model Editorial Structural Class Conf SETL Theme
deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-20251201 +0.32 +0.38 Moderate positive 0.41 -0.13 Digital Rights Protection
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite +0.56 ND Moderate positive 0.90 0.00 Online Safety
@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite +0.60 ND Strong positive 0.90 0.00 Online Safety
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 ND ND — — — —
Section deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-20251201 @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Preamble 0.54 ND ND ND
Article 1 0.44 ND ND ND
Article 2 0.40 ND ND ND
Article 3 0.30 ND ND ND
Article 4 ND ND ND ND
Article 5 0.33 ND ND ND
Article 6 0.34 ND ND ND
Article 7 0.37 ND ND ND
Article 8 0.27 ND ND ND
Article 9 ND ND ND ND
Article 10 0.17 ND ND ND
Article 11 ND ND ND ND
Article 12 0.43 ND ND ND
Article 13 0.37 ND ND ND
Article 14 ND ND ND ND
Article 15 0.27 ND ND ND
Article 16 ND ND ND ND
Article 17 0.17 ND ND ND
Article 18 0.47 ND ND ND
Article 19 0.67 ND ND ND
Article 20 0.37 ND ND ND
Article 21 0.57 ND ND ND
Article 22 0.27 ND ND ND
Article 23 ND ND ND ND
Article 24 ND ND ND ND
Article 25 0.16 ND ND ND
Article 26 0.13 ND ND ND
Article 27 0.47 ND ND ND
Article 28 0.37 ND ND ND
Article 29 0.47 ND ND ND
Article 30 0.37 ND ND ND
+0.34 Should Social Media Algorithms Have Age-Based Safeguards for Over-60s? (petition.parliament.uk S:+0.15 )
8 points by lalessandro2 2 days ago | 0 comments on HN | Moderate positive Policy · v3.7 · 2026-02-28 14:28:40 0
Summary Digital Protection Advocates
This UK Parliament petition advocates for updating the Online Safety Act to specifically recognize over-60s as a vulnerable group requiring protection from algorithmic amplification of hateful content. The content engages most strongly with rights to equality, protection from harm, free expression balanced with regulation, and democratic participation. The petition platform structurally supports democratic rights while advocating for age-specific digital protections.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: +0.54 — Preamble P Article 1: +0.44 — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: +0.40 — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: +0.30 — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: ND — No Slavery Article 4: No Data — No Slavery 4 Article 5: +0.33 — No Torture 5 Article 6: +0.34 — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: +0.37 — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: +0.27 — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: ND — No Arbitrary Detention Article 9: No Data — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: +0.17 — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: ND — Presumption of Innocence Article 11: No Data — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: +0.43 — Privacy 12 Article 13: +0.37 — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: ND — Asylum Article 14: No Data — Asylum 14 Article 15: +0.27 — Nationality 15 Article 16: ND — Marriage & Family Article 16: No Data — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: +0.17 — Property 17 Article 18: +0.47 — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +0.67 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: +0.37 — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: +0.57 — Political Participation 21 Article 22: +0.27 — Social Security 22 Article 23: ND — Work & Equal Pay Article 23: No Data — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: ND — Rest & Leisure Article 24: No Data — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: +0.16 — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: +0.13 — Education 26 Article 27: +0.47 — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: +0.37 — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: +0.47 — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: +0.37 — No Destruction of Rights 30
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
Editorial Mean +0.34 Structural Mean +0.15
Weighted Mean +0.39 Unweighted Mean +0.36
Max +0.67 Article 19 Min +0.13 Article 26
Signal 24 No Data 7
Volatility 0.13 (Medium)
Negative 0 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4
SETL ℹ +0.26 Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio ℹ 53% 53 facts · 47 inferences
Evidence 31% coverage ℹ
15M 9L 11 ND
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.46 (3 articles) Security: 0.32 (2 articles) Legal: 0.29 (4 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.36 (3 articles) Personal: 0.32 (2 articles) Expression: 0.54 (3 articles) Economic & Social: 0.22 (2 articles) Cultural: 0.30 (2 articles) Order & Duties: 0.40 (3 articles)
Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.60
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Practice Coverage
Editorial
+0.60
SETL
-0.26

Directly engages freedom of expression while advocating for balanced online safety.

+0.50
Article 12 Privacy
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.22

Directly addresses protection from attacks on honor and reputation through online hate.

+0.50
Article 21 Political Participation
High Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
-0.24

Directly exercises right to participate in government through petition.

+0.40
Preamble Preamble
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
-0.35

The petition recognizes human dignity and equal rights by advocating for protection of older adults from online harms.

+0.40
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
0.00

Explicitly advocates against age-based discrimination in online safety protections.

+0.40
Article 5 No Torture
Medium Advocacy
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
+0.20

Addresses protection from degrading treatment through online hate content.

+0.40
Article 18 Freedom of Thought
Medium Practice
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
-0.22

Exercises freedom of thought through petition expressing convictions about online safety.

+0.40
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Practice
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
-0.22

Exercises right to participate in cultural life through digital citizenship advocacy.

+0.40
Article 29 Duties to Community
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
-0.22

Balances rights with responsibilities through 'without restricting lawful speech' clause.

+0.30
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.32

Asserts equal dignity for older adults by seeking specific legal recognition of their vulnerability.

+0.30
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
Medium Advocacy
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
0.00

Advocates for security of person for older adults in digital spaces.

+0.30
Article 7 Equality Before Law
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.20

Addresses equal protection against discrimination based on age.

+0.30
Article 13 Freedom of Movement
Medium Practice
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.20

Exercises freedom of movement through petition advocacy across constituencies.

+0.30
Article 20 Assembly & Association
Medium Practice
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.20

Exercises peaceful assembly through collective petition action.

+0.30
Article 25 Standard of Living
Medium Advocacy
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
+0.24

Addresses standard of living through protection from online harms affecting well-being.

+0.30
Article 28 Social & International Order
Medium Practice
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.20

Seeks social order through legal framework for online safety.

+0.30
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights
Medium Practice
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
-0.20

Does not seek to destroy rights, but to enhance protections within existing framework.

+0.20
Article 6 Legal Personhood
Medium Practice
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.28

Implies equal protection of the law through advocacy for legal recognition.

+0.20
Article 8 Right to Remedy
Low Practice
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.17

Indirectly relates to effective remedy through petition mechanism.

+0.20
Article 15 Nationality
Low Practice
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.17

Implies right to nationality through UK citizen petition rights.

+0.20
Article 22 Social Security
Low Practice
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.17

Implies social security through protection from online harms for vulnerable group.

+0.20
Article 26 Education
Low Advocacy
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
+0.14

Implies education through mention of digital literacy disparities.

+0.10
Article 10 Fair Hearing
Low Practice
Editorial
+0.10
SETL
-0.14

Implies fair public hearing through petition process to Parliament.

+0.10
Article 17 Property
Low Practice
Editorial
+0.10
SETL
-0.14

Implies property rights through control of personal data in petition process.

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

No content related to slavery or servitude.

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

No content related to arbitrary detention.

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

No content related to presumption of innocence or criminal procedure.

ND
Article 14 Asylum

No content related to asylum or persecution.

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

No content related to marriage or family.

ND
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay

No content related to work, employment, or union rights.

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

No content related to rest, leisure, or working hours.
Structural Channel
What the site does
Element Modifier Affects Note
+0.70
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Practice Coverage
Structural
+0.70
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.26

Platform structurally enables free expression through petition system.

+0.60
Preamble Preamble
Medium Advocacy Practice
Structural
+0.60
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.35

Site provides platform for citizen participation in democratic process, enabling rights advocacy.

+0.60
Article 21 Political Participation
High Advocacy Practice
Structural
+0.60
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.24

Platform structurally enables participation in government through official channels.

+0.50
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.50
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.32

Platform treats all users equally in petition creation and signing process.

+0.50
Article 18 Freedom of Thought
Medium Practice
Structural
+0.50
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.22

Platform facilitates expression of conscience and belief through petition system.

+0.50
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Practice
Structural
+0.50
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.22

Platform enables participation in cultural/political life through democratic process.

+0.50
Article 29 Duties to Community
Medium Advocacy Practice
Structural
+0.50
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.22

Platform structures rights exercise within community standards and legal framework.

+0.40
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
0.00

Platform content does not discriminate based on user characteristics in access or presentation.

+0.40
Article 6 Legal Personhood
Medium Practice
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.28

Platform operates under established legal frameworks for petitioning government.

+0.40
Article 7 Equality Before Law
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.20

Platform applies equal procedures to all petitions regardless of topic.

+0.40
Article 12 Privacy
Medium Advocacy Practice
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.22

Platform respects user privacy in petition process.

+0.40
Article 13 Freedom of Movement
Medium Practice
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.20

Platform enables expression of views to government regardless of location within UK.

+0.40
Article 20 Assembly & Association
Medium Practice
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.20

Platform enables peaceful association through collective petition signing.

+0.40
Article 28 Social & International Order
Medium Practice
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.20

Platform operates within social order of democratic petitioning system.

+0.40
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights
Medium Practice
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.20

Platform operates within constitutional framework that protects against rights destruction.

+0.30
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
Medium Advocacy
Structural
+0.30
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
0.00

Platform provides secure environment for political expression and participation.

+0.30
Article 5 No Torture
Medium Advocacy
Structural
+0.30
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.20

Platform does not engage in cruel or degrading treatment of users.

+0.30
Article 8 Right to Remedy
Low Practice
Structural
+0.30
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.17

Platform provides formal mechanism to seek remedies through government processes.

+0.30
Article 15 Nationality
Low Practice
Structural
+0.30
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.17

Platform restricted to UK citizens and residents, affirming nationality-based rights.

+0.30
Article 22 Social Security
Low Practice
Structural
+0.30
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.17

Platform provides social mechanism for addressing community concerns.

+0.20
Article 10 Fair Hearing
Low Practice
Structural
+0.20
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.14

Platform channels citizen concerns to government for consideration.

+0.20
Article 17 Property
Low Practice
Structural
+0.20
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.14

Platform provides controls over personal information shared in petitions.

+0.10
Article 25 Standard of Living
Medium Advocacy
Structural
+0.10
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.24

Platform accessible for free, supporting digital inclusion.

+0.10
Article 26 Education
Low Advocacy
Structural
+0.10
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.14

Platform provides civic education through petition process documentation.

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

No structural elements related to slavery or servitude.

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

No structural elements related to detention.

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

No structural elements related to criminal justice.

ND
Article 14 Asylum

No structural elements related to asylum or refugee status.

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

No structural elements related to family rights.

ND
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay

No structural elements related to employment.

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

No structural elements related to rest or leisure.
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean. Learn more
Epistemic Quality ℹ
How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.54 medium claims
Sources
0.3
Evidence
0.4
Uncertainty
0.6
Purpose
1.0
Propaganda Flags ℹ
No manipulative rhetoric detected
0 techniques detected
Emotional Tone ℹ
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
measured
Valence
+0.1
Arousal
0.3
Dominance
0.5
Transparency ℹ
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.33
✓ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience
Solution Orientation ℹ
Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.68 mixed
Reader Agency
0.8
Stakeholder Voice ℹ
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.50 2 perspectives
Speaks: individuals
About: individualsmarginalized
Temporal Framing ℹ
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
present medium term
Geographic Scope ℹ
What geographic area does this content cover?
national
United Kingdom
Complexity ℹ
How accessible is this content to a general audience?
accessible low jargon general
Longitudinal 3 HN snapshots · 54 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 74 entries
2026-03-02 04:12 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.39) - -
2026-03-02 04:12 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.39 (Moderate positive) 10,807 tokens +0.12
2026-03-02 00:02 dlq_auto_replay DLQ auto-replay: message 98071 re-enqueued - -
2026-03-01 20:09 eval_success Evaluated: Mild positive (0.27) - -
2026-03-01 20:09 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.27 (Mild positive) 8,722 tokens -0.10
2026-03-01 20:09 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 0W 45R - -
2026-03-01 00:26 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.37) - -
2026-03-01 00:26 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.37 (Moderate positive) 10,175 tokens +0.15
2026-03-01 00:26 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 0W 1R - -
2026-03-01 00:03 dlq_auto_replay DLQ auto-replay: message 98021 re-enqueued - -
2026-02-28 23:11 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Should Social Media Algorithms Have Age-Based Safeguards for Over-60s? - -
2026-02-28 23:11 eval_failure Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted - -
2026-02-28 22:55 eval_failure Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted - -
2026-02-28 22:55 eval_failure Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted - -
2026-02-28 21:54 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Should Social Media Algorithms Have Age-Based Safeguards for Over-60s? - -
2026-02-28 21:54 eval_failure Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted - -
2026-02-28 21:53 eval_failure Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted - -
2026-02-28 15:45 eval_success Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.56) - -
2026-02-28 15:45 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.38 exceeds threshold (3 models) - -
2026-02-28 15:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 15:40 eval_success Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.56) - -
2026-02-28 15:40 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.38 exceeds threshold (3 models) - -
2026-02-28 15:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 15:36 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.38 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-02-28 15:36 eval_success Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) - -
2026-02-28 15:36 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 15:31 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 14:28 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.22 (Mild positive) 9,812 tokens -0.29
2026-02-28 14:10 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 14:03 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 12:03 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 11:59 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 11:42 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 10:49 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 10:41 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 09:16 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.51 (Moderate positive) 9,518 tokens +0.14
2026-02-28 09:08 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.37 (Moderate positive) 10,249 tokens
2026-02-28 08:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 07:39 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 07:36 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 07:25 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 07:17 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 06:55 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 06:39 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 06:25 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 06:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 06:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 05:27 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) -0.20
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 05:13 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) -0.24
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 04:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 04:20 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 04:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 04:10 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 04:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) -0.10
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 04:00 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) +0.30
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 03:47 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 03:46 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 03:27 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 03:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) -0.10
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 03:09 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 02:59 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 02:58 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 02:57 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 02:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 02:27 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 02:20 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 02:08 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 02:00 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 01:58 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 01:54 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 01:30 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety
2026-02-28 01:18 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 01:00 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive)
reasoning
Petition for age-based safeguards
2026-02-28 00:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive)
reasoning
Editorial advocates for rights of over-60s online safety