| 2026-03-01 22:41 | eval_success | Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.34) | - - |
| 2026-03-01 22:41 |
eval
|
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.34 (Moderate positive) 15,192 tokens +0.36 | |
| 2026-03-01 22:41 | rater_validation_warn | Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 0W 5R | - - |
| 2026-03-01 22:37 | eval_success | Evaluated: Neutral (-0.02) | - - |
| 2026-03-01 22:37 |
eval
|
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: -0.02 (Neutral) 14,990 tokens -0.66 | |
| 2026-03-01 22:37 | rater_validation_warn | Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 0W 2R | - - |
| 2026-03-01 10:49 | eval_success | Evaluated: Strong positive (0.64) | - - |
| 2026-03-01 10:49 | rater_validation_warn | Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 0W 2R | - - |
| 2026-03-01 10:49 |
eval
|
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.64 (Strong positive) 14,860 tokens +0.64 | |
| 2026-03-01 02:01 | dlq_auto_replay | DLQ auto-replay: message 97890 re-enqueued | - - |
| 2026-02-28 17:51 | dlq | Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Anthropic refuses to bend to Pentagon on AI safeguards as dispute nears deadline | - - |
| 2026-02-28 17:51 | eval_failure | Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted | - - |
| 2026-02-28 17:28 | credit_exhausted | Credit balance too low, pausing provider for 30 min | - - |
| 2026-02-28 17:14 | eval_failure | Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted | - - |
| 2026-02-28 15:40 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.20) | - - |
| 2026-02-28 15:40 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.20 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 13:43 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.10) | - - |
| 2026-02-28 13:43 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 13:39 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.10) | - - |
| 2026-02-28 13:39 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 13:27 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.10) | - - |
| 2026-02-28 13:27 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 11:42 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R | - - |
| 2026-02-28 11:42 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.20) | - - |
| 2026-02-28 11:42 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.20 (Mild positive) -0.08 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 11:35 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0W 1R | - - |
| 2026-02-28 11:35 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.10) | - - |
| 2026-02-28 11:35 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 11:31 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.10) | - - |
| 2026-02-28 11:31 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 10:47 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 10:25 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 08:58 |
eval
|
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: 0.00 (Neutral) 15,715 tokens -0.29 | |
| 2026-02-28 08:56 |
eval
|
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.29 (Mild positive) 15,307 tokens -0.31 | |
| 2026-02-28 08:54 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 07:53 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 07:52 |
eval
|
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.60 (Strong positive) 14,920 tokens | |
| 2026-02-28 07:30 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 07:17 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 07:11 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 07:08 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 07:05 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 06:38 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 05:59 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) +0.10 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 05:48 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 05:38 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 05:31 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.28 (Mild positive) +0.28 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 04:50 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 04:44 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 04:42 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 04:03 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 03:49 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 03:44 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 03:37 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 03:34 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 03:29 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 02:54 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 02:53 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 02:47 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 02:47 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 02:46 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 02:43 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 02:33 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 01:58 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 01:45 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 01:42 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 01:40 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 01:38 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 01:37 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 01:35 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 01:21 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |
| 2026-02-28 00:51 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) | |
| reasoning News article on AI safeguards |
| 2026-02-28 00:49 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) | |
| reasoning Editorial stance on AI safeguards and Pentagon dispute |