Model Comparison 100% sign agreement
Model Editorial Structural Class Conf SETL Theme
deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-20251201 +0.33 +0.40 Moderate positive 0.14 0.22 Consumer Economic Justice
@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite +0.60 ND Strong positive 0.90 0.00 Consumer Protection
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite +0.40 ND Moderate positive 0.80 0.00 Economic Justice
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 +0.29 +0.17 Mild positive 0.35 0.18 Consumer Rights & Anti-Corruption
Section deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-20251201 @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Preamble 0.30 ND ND 0.30
Article 1 0.20 ND ND 0.15
Article 2 ND ND ND ND
Article 3 ND ND ND 0.15
Article 4 ND ND ND ND
Article 5 ND ND ND ND
Article 6 ND ND ND ND
Article 7 0.20 ND ND 0.22
Article 8 ND ND ND 0.45
Article 9 ND ND ND ND
Article 10 ND ND ND ND
Article 11 ND ND ND 0.20
Article 12 ND ND ND -0.02
Article 13 ND ND ND ND
Article 14 ND ND ND ND
Article 15 ND ND ND ND
Article 16 ND ND ND ND
Article 17 0.53 ND ND 0.35
Article 18 ND ND ND ND
Article 19 0.60 ND ND 0.50
Article 20 ND ND ND ND
Article 21 ND ND ND 0.15
Article 22 ND ND ND 0.15
Article 23 0.50 ND ND 0.25
Article 24 ND ND ND ND
Article 25 0.50 ND ND 0.35
Article 26 ND ND ND ND
Article 27 0.30 ND ND ND
Article 28 0.30 ND ND 0.17
Article 29 ND ND ND 0.15
Article 30 ND ND ND 0.15
+0.11 Cards Against Humanity Statement and Form for Tariff Refunds (www.getyourfuckingmoneyback.com S:+0.05 )
101 points by verdverm 2 days ago | 19 comments on HN | Moderate positive Contested Landing Page · v3.7 · 2026-03-01 12:30:09 0
Summary Property & Accountability Advocates
The page is a corporate initiative by Cards Against Humanity to refund customers for overcharges caused by tariffs. It strongly advocates for consumer property rights (Article 17) and equality before the law (Article 7), while criticizing government corruption and exercising freedom of expression (Article 19). The overall direction is positive, aligning with rights to redress, fair economic treatment, and accountability.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: +0.30 — Preamble P Article 1: +0.20 — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: ND — Non-Discrimination Article 2: No Data — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: ND — Life, Liberty, Security Article 3: No Data — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: ND — No Slavery Article 4: No Data — No Slavery 4 Article 5: ND — No Torture Article 5: No Data — No Torture 5 Article 6: ND — Legal Personhood Article 6: No Data — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: +0.20 — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: ND — Right to Remedy Article 8: No Data — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: ND — No Arbitrary Detention Article 9: No Data — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: ND — Fair Hearing Article 10: No Data — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: ND — Presumption of Innocence Article 11: No Data — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: ND — Privacy Article 12: No Data — Privacy 12 Article 13: ND — Freedom of Movement Article 13: No Data — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: ND — Asylum Article 14: No Data — Asylum 14 Article 15: ND — Nationality Article 15: No Data — Nationality 15 Article 16: ND — Marriage & Family Article 16: No Data — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: +0.53 — Property 17 Article 18: ND — Freedom of Thought Article 18: No Data — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +0.60 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: ND — Assembly & Association Article 20: No Data — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: ND — Political Participation Article 21: No Data — Political Participation 21 Article 22: ND — Social Security Article 22: No Data — Social Security 22 Article 23: +0.50 — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: ND — Rest & Leisure Article 24: No Data — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: +0.50 — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: ND — Education Article 26: No Data — Education 26 Article 27: +0.30 — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: +0.30 — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: ND — Duties to Community Article 29: No Data — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: ND — No Destruction of Rights Article 30: No Data — No Destruction of Rights 30
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
Editorial Mean +0.11 Structural Mean +0.05
Weighted Mean +0.42 Unweighted Mean +0.38
Max +0.60 Article 19 Min +0.20 Article 1
Signal 9 No Data 22
Volatility 0.14 (Medium)
Negative 0 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4
SETL +0.18 Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio 71% 42 facts · 17 inferences
Evidence 42% coverage
5H 7M 19L
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.25 (2 articles) Security: 0.00 (0 articles) Legal: 0.20 (1 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.00 (0 articles) Personal: 0.53 (1 articles) Expression: 0.60 (1 articles) Economic & Social: 0.50 (2 articles) Cultural: 0.30 (1 articles) Order & Duties: 0.30 (1 articles)
HN Discussion 5 top-level · 5 replies
verdverm 2026-02-27 18:26 UTC link
Title editorialized to remove profanity and be explanatory, actual:

"Cards Against Humanity Gives You Your Fucking Money Back"

toddsiegel 2026-02-27 19:32 UTC link
I figured a few honest small businesses would issue refunds.

What I did not anticipate was that someone would do it with this much style.

God, I fucking love those people.

EnPissant 2026-02-27 20:51 UTC link
This is just marketing. It doesn't even say if you will get any money back or how much. There is a form asking you how much you overpaid, and stating maybe you will get something back. Surely they could come out and say how much they raised prices due to tariffs and promise a refund with proof of purchase? Maybe they felt that number was too small to make for a good marketing stunt?

Mostly this is just an attempt at raising their brand's profile by printing insults (demented, pedophile, etc), and obscenities (fucking, dumbass, etc) directed at Trump (a popular thing to do).

username135 2026-02-28 01:15 UTC link
Do you think the government will pay interest?

lol

wanderingstan 2026-02-28 05:18 UTC link
The site seems to be getting crushed. Can someone summarize what it did?
mannanj 2026-02-27 20:58 UTC link
I disagree.
kgwxd 2026-02-27 20:58 UTC link
"Those people" are supposed to be "Against Humanity", damn it. Why do groups always do the opposite of what they claim to stand for?
xrd 2026-02-27 21:01 UTC link
You are focused on the wrong wrong here.
verdverm 2026-02-27 21:04 UTC link
The Epstein Files are revealing, not just for the crimes against humanity contained therein, but also the conversations amongst the Epstein Class about their strategy for domination and the plain text corruption.

It's time for the Epstein Trials to begin. More and more people will continue to speak up. Which side of history do you want to be on?

https://jmail.world

max1cc 2026-02-27 21:58 UTC link
Very fun to complain about obscenities with the username "EnPissant"
Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.50
Article 17 Property
High Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.22

The page explicitly advocates for property rights of consumers, promising to return overcharged money directly to them.

+0.50
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
Medium Advocacy
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
ND

The page criticizes government and corporate actors openly, using strong language to express opinion on corruption and tariffs.

+0.40
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Medium Advocacy
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
ND

The page frames fair pay for work (the company's products) and just compensation for overcharges as a right of consumers.

+0.40
Article 25 Standard of Living
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
ND

The page addresses economic security indirectly by advocating for consumers to be made whole after unfair price increases.

+0.30
Preamble Preamble
Medium Advocacy
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
ND

The page frames its mission as standing up for people against corporate profiteering and government overreach, advocating for justice and dignity for customers.

+0.30
Article 28 Social & International Order
Low Advocacy
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
ND

The page implicitly calls for a social order where corporations are accountable and consumers are protected from arbitrary economic harm.

+0.20
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Advocacy
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
ND

The page implies customers deserve fair treatment and equality in economic transactions, opposing price gouging.

+0.20
Article 7 Equality Before Law
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
ND

The page's core promise is to refund customers who were overcharged, implying a corrective action for unequal financial treatment.

+0.20
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
ND

The page positions its refund initiative as a creative and moral contribution to culture, contrasting with greedy corporations.

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination

ND

ND
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security

ND

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

ND

ND
Article 5 No Torture

ND

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood

ND

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy

ND

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

ND

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing

ND

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

ND

ND
Article 12 Privacy

ND

ND
Article 13 Freedom of Movement

ND

ND
Article 14 Asylum

ND

ND
Article 15 Nationality

ND

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

ND

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought

ND

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association

ND

ND
Article 21 Political Participation

ND

ND
Article 22 Social Security

ND

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

ND

ND
Article 26 Education

ND

ND
Article 29 Duties to Community

ND

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

ND

Structural Channel
What the site does
Element Modifier Affects Note
Legal & Terms
Privacy
No privacy policy or data handling notice found on the page.
Terms of Service
No terms of service or legal disclaimers found on the page.
Identity & Mission
Mission +0.10
Article 17 Article 23 Article 25
Page explicitly declares a mission to refund customers for overcharges caused by tariffs, framed as corporate accountability.
Editorial Code
No editorial or journalistic code found.
Ownership 0.00
Page clearly identifies itself as an initiative of Cards Against Humanity.
Access & Distribution
Access Model +0.10
Article 19 Article 27
Page is freely accessible, contains no paywalls, and provides information and a form for public use.
Ad/Tracking 0.00
Article 12
No advertisements visible on page. Some script-based analytics (zaraz) detected.
Accessibility 0.00
Article 7 Article 27
The site is a single static page with clear text and a simple form. No accessibility features declared, but default font legibility and simple structure observed.
+0.40
Article 17 Property
High Advocacy Practice
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
+0.10
SETL
+0.22

The site provides a form for users to submit claims to receive a financial refund, directly enabling a property restoration process.

ND
Preamble Preamble
Medium Advocacy

ND

ND
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Advocacy

ND

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination

ND

ND
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security

ND

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

ND

ND
Article 5 No Torture

ND

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood

ND

ND
Article 7 Equality Before Law
Low Framing

ND

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy

ND

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

ND

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing

ND

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

ND

ND
Article 12 Privacy

ND

ND
Article 13 Freedom of Movement

ND

ND
Article 14 Asylum

ND

ND
Article 15 Nationality

ND

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

ND

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought

ND

ND
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
Medium Advocacy

ND

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association

ND

ND
Article 21 Political Participation

ND

ND
Article 22 Social Security

ND

ND
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Medium Advocacy

ND

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

ND

ND
Article 25 Standard of Living
Medium Framing

ND

ND
Article 26 Education

ND

ND
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Low Framing

ND

ND
Article 28 Social & International Order
Low Advocacy

ND

ND
Article 29 Duties to Community

ND

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

ND

Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean. Learn more
Epistemic Quality
How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.64 medium claims
Sources
0.7
Evidence
0.6
Uncertainty
0.3
Purpose
1.0
Propaganda Flags
5 manipulative rhetoric techniques found
5 techniques detected
loaded language
"obviously illegal tariffs are obviously illegal"
name calling
"Corporate America’s preeminent dipshits and douchebags"
exaggeration
"one of the most profound and flagrant acts of corruption in the 21st century"
slogans
"Get Your Fucking Money Back"
appeal to fear
"you likely got fucked"
Emotional Tone
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
confrontational
Valence
-0.6
Arousal
0.8
Dominance
0.7
Transparency
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
1.00
✓ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience
Solution Orientation
Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.72 mixed
Reader Agency
0.8
Stakeholder Voice
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.40 3 perspectives
Speaks: corporation
About: governmentcorporationindividuals
Temporal Framing
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
present short term
Geographic Scope
What geographic area does this content cover?
national
Complexity
How accessible is this content to a general audience?
accessible low jargon general
Longitudinal 106 HN snapshots · 128 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 148 entries
2026-03-01 19:14 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.42) - -
2026-03-01 19:14 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.34 exceeds threshold (3 models) - -
2026-03-01 19:14 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.42 (Moderate positive) 10,951 tokens +0.24
2026-03-01 17:57 eval_success Evaluated: Mild positive (0.18) - -
2026-03-01 17:57 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.34 exceeds threshold (3 models) - -
2026-03-01 17:57 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.18 (Mild positive) 12,768 tokens -0.20
2026-03-01 17:57 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 0W 2R - -
2026-03-01 16:13 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.38) - -
2026-03-01 16:13 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.34 exceeds threshold (3 models) - -
2026-03-01 16:13 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.38 (Moderate positive) 12,147 tokens +0.25
2026-03-01 13:08 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.34 exceeds threshold (3 models) - -
2026-03-01 13:08 eval_success Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) - -
2026-03-01 13:08 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) -0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 12:32 eval_success Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.40) - -
2026-03-01 12:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 12:30 eval_success Evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) - -
2026-03-01 12:30 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.13 (Mild positive) 12,071 tokens +0.02
2026-03-01 12:26 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.44 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-01 12:26 eval_success Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.70) - -
2026-03-01 12:26 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 11:59 eval_success Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.40) - -
2026-03-01 11:59 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 11:52 eval_success Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) - -
2026-03-01 11:52 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.34 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-01 11:52 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) -0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 11:08 eval_success Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.40) - -
2026-03-01 11:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 10:51 eval_success Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.70) - -
2026-03-01 10:51 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 10:51 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.44 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-01 10:46 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.44 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-01 10:46 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 10:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 10:01 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 09:56 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 09:21 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 09:09 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 08:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 08:21 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 08:15 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 07:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 07:29 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 07:24 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) -0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 06:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 06:34 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 06:29 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 05:58 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 05:47 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 05:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 05:07 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 04:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 04:21 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 03:41 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 03:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 03:32 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 03:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 03:02 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 02:57 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 02:19 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 02:12 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 02:06 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 01:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 01:22 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 00:46 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-03-01 00:34 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-03-01 00:06 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 23:45 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) -0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 23:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 22:50 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 22:19 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 22:06 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 21:33 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 21:29 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 21:19 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 20:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 20:27 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) -0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 19:53 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 19:48 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 19:45 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 19:05 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 19:02 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 18:59 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 18:27 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 18:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 18:22 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 18:00 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 17:58 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 17:54 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 17:35 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 17:29 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 17:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 17:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) -0.16
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 17:03 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 16:58 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 16:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) +0.16
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 16:36 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 16:35 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 16:31 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 15:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 15:29 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 14:12 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.26 (Mild positive) -0.18
2026-02-28 13:52 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) -0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 13:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 13:18 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 13:05 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.43 (Moderate positive)
2026-02-28 13:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 10:54 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 10:41 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) -0.16
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 08:29 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) +0.16
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 08:27 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 08:03 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 07:30 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 07:08 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) -0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 06:59 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 06:44 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 06:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 06:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 05:53 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 05:43 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 05:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 05:24 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 05:23 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 05:23 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) -0.16
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 05:20 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 05:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) -0.24
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 04:43 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 04:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 04:14 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 03:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 03:27 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 03:18 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 03:10 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 02:59 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive) -0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 02:45 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 02:40 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 02:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 02:36 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 02:28 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 02:15 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.11 (Mild positive) 11,874 tokens +0.09
2026-02-28 02:00 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 01:43 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 01:34 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 01:30 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) +0.10
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 01:21 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive) 0.00
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 01:15 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights
2026-02-28 01:05 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.02 (Neutral) 10,932 tokens
2026-02-28 00:50 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive)
reasoning
Consumer rights advocacy
2026-02-28 00:46 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive)
reasoning
EDitorial stance on tariff refunds and human rights