home / github.com / item 47171773
Model Comparison
Model Editorial Structural Class Conf SETL Theme deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-20251201 0.00 +0.01 Neutral 0.20 -0.13 Technical Documentation @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite 0.00 ND Neutral 1.00 0.00 Technology @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite 0.00 ND Neutral 1.00 0.00 no human rights theme claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 ND ND — — — —
Section deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-20251201 @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Preamble 0.00 ND ND ND Article 1 0.05 ND ND ND Article 2 0.05 ND ND ND Article 3 0.00 ND ND ND Article 4 0.00 ND ND ND Article 5 0.00 ND ND ND Article 6 0.00 ND ND ND Article 7 0.00 ND ND ND Article 8 0.00 ND ND ND Article 9 0.00 ND ND ND Article 10 0.00 ND ND ND Article 11 0.00 ND ND ND Article 12 0.02 ND ND ND Article 13 0.00 ND ND ND Article 14 0.00 ND ND ND Article 15 0.00 ND ND ND Article 16 0.00 ND ND ND Article 17 -0.05 ND ND ND Article 18 0.00 ND ND ND Article 19 0.25 ND ND ND Article 20 0.00 ND ND ND Article 21 0.00 ND ND ND Article 22 0.00 ND ND ND Article 23 0.00 ND ND ND Article 24 0.00 ND ND ND Article 25 0.15 ND ND ND Article 26 0.15 ND ND ND Article 27 0.28 ND ND ND Article 28 0.00 ND ND ND Article 29 0.00 ND ND ND Article 30 0.00 ND ND ND
Summary Technical Collaboration Acknowledges
The page presents an open-source software repository for a cron job management dashboard. Content primarily focuses on technical tooling with minimal direct human rights engagement. The GitHub platform infrastructure provides structural support for knowledge sharing and collaboration rights. Overall evaluation shows mild positive alignment with rights related to cultural participation and information access through the open-source model.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: 0.00 — Preamble P Article 1: +0.05 — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: +0.05 — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: 0.00 — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: 0.00 — No Slavery 4 Article 5: 0.00 — No Torture 5 Article 6: 0.00 — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: 0.00 — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: 0.00 — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: 0.00 — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: 0.00 — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: 0.00 — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: +0.02 — Privacy 12 Article 13: 0.00 — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: 0.00 — Asylum 14 Article 15: 0.00 — Nationality 15 Article 16: 0.00 — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: -0.05 — Property 17 Article 18: 0.00 — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +0.25 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: 0.00 — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: 0.00 — Political Participation 21 Article 22: 0.00 — Social Security 22 Article 23: 0.00 — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: 0.00 — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: +0.15 — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: +0.15 — Education 26 Article 27: +0.28 — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: 0.00 — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: 0.00 — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: 0.00 — No Destruction of Rights 30
Aggregates
Editorial Mean +0.08 Structural Mean +0.10 Weighted Mean +0.03 Unweighted Mean +0.03 Max +0.28 Article 27 Min -0.05 Article 17 Signal 31 No Data 0 Volatility 0.07 (Low) Negative 1 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4 SETL ℹ 0.00 Balanced FW Ratio ℹ 53% 19 facts · 17 inferences
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.03 (3 articles) Security: 0.00 (3 articles) Legal: 0.00 (6 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.01 (4 articles) Personal: -0.02 (3 articles) Expression: 0.08 (3 articles) Economic & Social: 0.04 (4 articles) Cultural: 0.21 (2 articles) Order & Duties: 0.00 (3 articles)
HN Discussion
3 top-level · 2 replies
Nice. Hyperland + multiple monitors + TUIs like this make my workflow quite futuristic.
Very cool. I would've used this a lot in a past life. It's interesting how many different ways there are to manage cron jobs, too. I've seen:
Place 1: Cron jobs edited on the box via vim, and every night they're scraped and off there are diffs, they're committed. Kind of like reverse management. It was actually a pretty elegant solution for the environment it was in, where devs just could not be convinced to not just edit the crontab directly.
Place 2: no cron jobs, it's all either airflow tasks or a bespoke managed clustering cron-like thing.
Place 3: all k8s scheduled job pods, conceptually the same but somehow less enjoyable.
Honestly I liked the airflow version the best, python is just better than bash, and often cron jobs end up developing dependencies anyway. Plus Python lets you wire in many niceties.
Thanks for sharing my project!
I am glad you guys like it.
Good you are here. I was surprised you hadn't posted it here yet.
Editorial Channel
What the content says
0.00
Low
Content does not mention or engage with human dignity, freedom, justice, or the preamble's philosophical foundations.
FW Ratio: 75%
Observable Facts
The page title is 'GitHub - antoniorodr/cronboard: A terminal-based dashboard for managing cron jobs locally and on servers.' The page contains technical documentation for a software tool. The page does not contain any language about human dignity, freedom, justice, or peace. Inferences
The content is purely technical and does not engage with foundational human rights principles. 0.00
Low
No mention of human dignity, equal rights, or rational conscience.
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
The page describes a technical tool for managing cron jobs. No language about human dignity, equal rights, or conscience is present. Inferences
Technical documentation does not address philosophical concepts of human equality. 0.00
Low
No discussion of discrimination, equality, or protected characteristics.
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
The page does not mention discrimination, equality, race, sex, language, religion, or political opinion. The software tool appears available to all users without stated restrictions. Inferences
Technical tools are typically designed without explicit consideration of discrimination factors. 0.00
Low
No mention of life, liberty, or security of person.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Content focuses on cron job management, not human life, liberty, or security. Inferences
System administration tools do not inherently engage with physical safety rights. 0.00
Low
No mention of slavery or servitude.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to slavery, servitude, or forced labor. Inferences
Technical documentation does not typically address slavery prohibitions. 0.00
Low
No mention of torture, cruel treatment, or punishment.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to torture, cruel treatment, or punishment. Inferences
Cron job management tools do not engage with torture prevention. 0.00
Low
No mention of legal personality or recognition before the law.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to legal personality or recognition before the law. Inferences
Software tools typically assume users have legal standing but do not affirm it. 0.00
Low
No mention of equal protection or discrimination prohibition.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to equal protection under the law or discrimination prohibition. Inferences
Technical documentation does not engage with legal equality concepts. 0.00
Low
No mention of effective remedies or rights violations.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to effective remedies for rights violations. Inferences
Software tools provide functional solutions, not legal remedies. 0.00
Low
No mention of arbitrary detention or arrest.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to arbitrary detention, arrest, or exile. Inferences
Cron management tools do not address personal liberty restrictions. 0.00
Low
No mention of fair hearings or independent tribunals.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to fair public hearings or independent tribunals. Inferences
Technical tools operate outside judicial frameworks. 0.00
Low
No mention of presumption of innocence or criminal defense.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to presumption of innocence or criminal defense rights. Inferences
Software documentation does not engage with criminal justice principles. 0.00
Low
No mention of privacy, attacks on honor, or arbitrary interference.
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
The page contains feature flags and analytics tracking data in the source code. No explicit privacy protections or privacy-focused language is present. Inferences
Analytics tracking suggests data collection that could affect user privacy. 0.00
Low
No mention of freedom of movement or leaving/returning to countries.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to freedom of movement, residence, or border crossing. Inferences
Software tools facilitate digital workflows, not physical movement. 0.00
Low
No mention of asylum or persecution.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to asylum, persecution, or political refugees. Inferences
Technical documentation does not address asylum or refugee protection. 0.00
Low
No mention of nationality or citizenship rights.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to nationality, citizenship, or statelessness. Inferences
Software tools typically operate independent of nationality considerations. 0.00
Low
No mention of marriage, family, or consent rights.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to marriage, family, or consent in marriage. Inferences
Cron management tools do not engage with family or marriage rights. 0.00
Low
No mention of property ownership or deprivation.
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
The project is hosted on GitHub with an open-source model. No explicit statements about property rights or ownership protections. Inferences
Open-source projects imply shared intellectual property but do not explicitly affirm property rights. 0.00
Low
No mention of thought, conscience, religion, or belief freedom.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to thought, conscience, religion, or belief freedom. Inferences
Technical tools focus on practical functionality, not ideological or religious freedom. 0.00
Low Practice
No mention of opinion, expression, or information freedom.
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
The page shares technical documentation and code for a software tool. GitHub provides a platform for publishing and sharing information. Inferences
Code sharing platforms structurally support freedom of expression and information exchange. 0.00
Low
No mention of assembly or association freedom.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to peaceful assembly or freedom of association. Inferences
Individual software projects do not inherently facilitate group assembly. 0.00
Low
No mention of political participation, voting, or public service.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to political participation, voting, or public service access. Inferences
Technical tools do not engage with political participation rights. 0.00
Low
No mention of social security, economic rights, or dignity development.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to social security, economic rights, or national effort. Inferences
Software tools provide utility but do not explicitly support social security systems. 0.00
Low
No mention of work, employment, equal pay, or union rights.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to work, employment, equal pay, or union membership. Inferences
Cron management tools are work-related but do not address labor rights. 0.00
Low
No mention of rest, leisure, or working hours limitation.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to rest, leisure, or reasonable working hours. Inferences
Automation tools might reduce workload but do not explicitly affirm rest rights. 0.00
Low
No mention of standard of living, health, or family well-being.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to adequate living standards, health, or well-being. Inferences
Technical tools do not address health or living standard rights. 0.00
Low
No mention of education, instruction, or educational goals.
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
The page contains technical documentation for using a software tool. No reference to education rights, instruction, or educational development. Inferences
Technical documentation provides practical instruction but does not engage with universal education rights. 0.00
Low Practice
No mention of cultural life, scientific advancement, or authorship protection.
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
The project is open-source and publicly accessible. Technical documentation is provided for users to learn and implement. Inferences
Open-source platforms structurally enable participation in scientific and cultural life. 0.00
Low
No mention of social/international order for rights realization.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to social or international order for rights realization. Inferences
Technical tools do not address broader social structures for rights fulfillment. 0.00
Low
No mention of duties to community or rights limitations.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to duties to community or limitations on rights for others' freedoms. Inferences
Software documentation does not address community responsibilities or rights limitations. 0.00
Low
No mention of rights destruction or interpretation permitting destruction.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No reference to destroying rights or interpreting the Declaration to permit destruction. Inferences
Technical content does not engage with meta-level rights protection principles.
Structural Channel
What the site does
+0.15
Low Practice
Open-source model enables participation in cultural/scientific life; documentation supports learning.
+0.10
Low Practice
GitHub platform enables code sharing and documentation, supporting information exchange.
0.00
Low
GitHub platform provides basic infrastructure for open-source development; no specific UDHR alignment signals.
0.00
Low
GitHub platform treats users equally by default; no observable signals regarding equal treatment in this specific content.
0.00
Low
GitHub's platform access appears open; no observable signals regarding non-discrimination in this content.
0.00
Low
GitHub platform provides security features; no specific life/liberty signals in this content.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding anti-slavery practices.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding torture prevention.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding legal recognition.
0.00
Low
GitHub's platform provides equal access; no specific signals in this content.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding legal remedies.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding detention freedom.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding judicial fairness.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding criminal justice rights.
0.00
Low
GitHub platform collects analytics data; no specific privacy signals in this content.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding movement freedom.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding asylum rights.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding nationality rights.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding family rights.
0.00
Low
Open-source licensing model; GitHub controls platform but content is user-generated.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding freedom of thought or religion.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding assembly or association rights.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding political participation.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding social security or economic rights.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding work or labor rights.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding rest or leisure rights.
0.00
Low
GitHub has accessibility features; no specific health/well-being signals.
0.00
Low
Documentation provides technical education; no broader educational rights signals.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding social order for rights fulfillment.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding community duties or rights limitations.
0.00
Low
No observable signals regarding rights destruction prevention.
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean.
Learn more How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.23 low claims
Sources 0.2 Evidence 0.1 Uncertainty 0.1 Purpose 0.8
No manipulative rhetoric detected
0 techniques detected
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
detached
Valence +0.1 Arousal 0.1 Dominance 0.2
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.33
✓ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.42 solution oriented
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.20 1 perspective
Speaks: individuals
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
present unspecified
What geographic area does this content cover?
global How accessible is this content to a general audience?
technical medium jargon domain specific
Longitudinal
770 HN snapshots · 22 evals
Audit Trail
42 entries all eval pipeline all models deepseek-v3.2 llama-4-scout-wai llama-3.3-70b-wai
newest first
2026-03-02 03:18 eval_success Evaluated: Neutral (0.03) - - 2026-03-02 03:18
eval
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2 : +0.03 (Neutral) 10,984 tokens -0.10 2026-03-02 01:52 eval_success Evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) - - 2026-03-02 01:52 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 0W 11R - - 2026-03-02 01:52
eval
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2 : +0.13 (Mild positive) 9,994 tokens 2026-03-02 01:02 dlq_auto_replay DLQ auto-replay: message 98024 re-enqueued - - 2026-03-01 02:01 dlq_auto_replay DLQ auto-replay: message 97896 re-enqueued - - 2026-02-28 22:02 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Cronboard: A terminal-based dashboard for managing cron jobs - - 2026-02-28 22:02 eval_failure Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted - - 2026-02-28 21:51 eval_failure Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted - - 2026-02-28 18:05 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Cronboard: A terminal-based dashboard for managing cron jobs - - 2026-02-28 18:05 eval_failure Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted - - 2026-02-28 17:28 eval_failure Evaluation failed: AbortError: The operation was aborted - - 2026-02-28 15:41 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-02-28 15:41
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning ED: Neutral tech project documentation
2026-02-28 15:36 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-02-28 15:36
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 15:31 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-02-28 15:31
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 09:50 eval_success Light evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-02-28 09:50 rater_validation_warn Light validation warnings for model llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0W 1R - - 2026-02-28 09:50
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 08:56 eval_success Light evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-02-28 08:56
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 08:56 rater_validation_warn Light validation warnings for model llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0W 1R - - 2026-02-28 08:55 eval_success Light evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-02-28 08:55
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning ED: Neutral tech project documentation
2026-02-28 08:55 rater_validation_warn Light validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R - - 2026-02-28 08:51
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 06:36
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 06:11
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 05:01
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning ED: Neutral tech project documentation
2026-02-28 04:41
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 04:31
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 04:08
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 03:31
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning ED: Neutral tech project documentation
2026-02-28 03:28
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning ED: Neutral tech project documentation
2026-02-28 03:23
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning ED: Neutral tech project documentation
2026-02-28 02:48
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning ED: Neutral tech project documentation
2026-02-28 01:28
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 reasoning ED: Neutral tech project documentation
2026-02-28 01:06
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) reasoning tech tutorial no rights stance
2026-02-28 00:54
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) reasoning ED: Neutral tech project documentation