home / www.whitehouse.gov / item 47153576
Model Comparison
Model Editorial Structural Class Conf SETL Theme deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-20251201 -0.04 -0.04 Neutral 0.04 0.01 Free Expression @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite -0.38 ND Moderate negative 0.80 0.00 Media Bias @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite -0.40 ND Moderate negative 0.80 0.00 Media Freedom
Section deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-20251201 @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite Preamble 0.13 ND ND Article 1 ND ND ND Article 2 ND ND ND Article 3 ND ND ND Article 4 ND ND ND Article 5 ND ND ND Article 6 ND ND ND Article 7 ND ND ND Article 8 ND ND ND Article 9 ND ND ND Article 10 ND ND ND Article 11 ND ND ND Article 12 -0.14 ND ND Article 13 ND ND ND Article 14 ND ND ND Article 15 ND ND ND Article 16 ND ND ND Article 17 ND ND ND Article 18 ND ND ND Article 19 -0.06 ND ND Article 20 ND ND ND Article 21 -0.04 ND ND Article 22 ND ND ND Article 23 ND ND ND Article 24 ND ND ND Article 25 ND ND ND Article 26 ND ND ND Article 27 ND ND ND Article 28 ND ND ND Article 29 ND ND ND Article 30 ND ND ND
Summary Free Expression Undermines
The White House 'Media Offenders' page presents a government-run media criticism platform featuring a 'Hall of Shame' and 'Leaderboard of networks ranked by Repeated Lies'. The content strongly engages with freedom of expression (Article 19) through its critical framing of media as 'Fake News' and 'serial offenders', while also touching on privacy/reputation (Article 12) and freedom of thought (Article 18). The overall evaluation is negative due to the government's use of pejorative labeling and reputational consequences that may chill free expression.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: +0.13 — Preamble P Article 1: ND — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood Article 1: No Data — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: ND — Non-Discrimination Article 2: No Data — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: ND — Life, Liberty, Security Article 3: No Data — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: ND — No Slavery Article 4: No Data — No Slavery 4 Article 5: ND — No Torture Article 5: No Data — No Torture 5 Article 6: ND — Legal Personhood Article 6: No Data — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: ND — Equality Before Law Article 7: No Data — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: ND — Right to Remedy Article 8: No Data — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: ND — No Arbitrary Detention Article 9: No Data — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: ND — Fair Hearing Article 10: No Data — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: ND — Presumption of Innocence Article 11: No Data — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: -0.14 — Privacy 12 Article 13: ND — Freedom of Movement Article 13: No Data — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: ND — Asylum Article 14: No Data — Asylum 14 Article 15: ND — Nationality Article 15: No Data — Nationality 15 Article 16: ND — Marriage & Family Article 16: No Data — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: ND — Property Article 17: No Data — Property 17 Article 18: ND — Freedom of Thought Article 18: No Data — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: -0.06 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: ND — Assembly & Association Article 20: No Data — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: -0.04 — Political Participation 21 Article 22: ND — Social Security Article 22: No Data — Social Security 22 Article 23: ND — Work & Equal Pay Article 23: No Data — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: ND — Rest & Leisure Article 24: No Data — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: ND — Standard of Living Article 25: No Data — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: ND — Education Article 26: No Data — Education 26 Article 27: ND — Cultural Participation Article 27: No Data — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: ND — Social & International Order Article 28: No Data — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: ND — Duties to Community Article 29: No Data — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: ND — No Destruction of Rights Article 30: No Data — No Destruction of Rights 30
Aggregates
Editorial Mean -0.16 Structural Mean +0.01 Weighted Mean -0.03 Unweighted Mean -0.03 Max +0.13 Preamble Min -0.14 Article 12 Signal 4 No Data 27 Volatility 0.10 (Low) Negative 3 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4 SETL ℹ -0.16 Structural-dominant FW Ratio ℹ 75% 45 facts · 15 inferences
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.13 (1 articles) Security: 0.00 (0 articles) Legal: 0.00 (0 articles) Privacy & Movement: -0.14 (1 articles) Personal: 0.00 (0 articles) Expression: -0.04 (2 articles) Economic & Social: 0.00 (0 articles) Cultural: 0.00 (0 articles) Order & Duties: 0.00 (0 articles) Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.10
Low Framing Advocacy
Content describes tracking and holding 'fake news' accountable to 'stay informed, stay accurate', implying support for information integrity.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
Page name is 'Media Offenders'. Page description references 'Fake News', 'Hall of Shame', and 'Leaderboard of networks ranked by Repeated Lies'. Page description states purpose is to 'fact check and hold Fake News accountable' and to 'Stay informed, stay accurate.' Inferences
The language advocating for accuracy suggests an alignment with the UDHR preamble value of promoting 'freedom' and 'justice'. The combative framing ('Media Offenders', 'Hall of Shame') introduces a negative structural element toward some media actors. +0.05
Low Framing
The site is an official government channel providing information; the act of informing the public aligns with democratic governance.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The page is published on the official White House website. The page description includes the phrase 'Stay informed'. Inferences
Providing public information through an official government channel supports the right to take part in government. The editorial framing is primarily about media critique, not direct governance participation. 0.00
Low Framing
No explicit mention of privacy or reputation.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Page description mentions a 'Hall of Shame for serial offenders'. No mention of privacy protections is present on the page. Inferences
The public listing of a 'Hall of Shame' could be interpreted as a practice that may not respect the reputation of those named. The absence of privacy considerations in a page about media critique suggests neglect of this right. -0.30
Medium Framing Coverage
Content strongly condemns 'fake news' and creates a list of 'media offenders', framing certain media as purveyors of 'repeated lies'. This can be seen as a form of counter-speech but also as an attempt to discredit critics.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
The page title is 'Media Offenders'. Page description promotes a 'Media Bias Tracker that fact checks and holds Fake News accountable'. Page description includes 'Hall of Shame for serial offenders' and 'Leaderboard of networks ranked by Repeated Lies'. Inferences
The editorial stance explicitly labels and ranks media entities, which can have a chilling effect on free expression. The structural creation of a 'Hall of Shame' is an institutional practice that names and shames, potentially punishing expression. ND
No observable content regarding human dignity, equality, or brotherhood.
ND
No observable content regarding non-discrimination.
ND
No observable content regarding life, liberty, or security.
ND
No observable content regarding slavery.
ND
No observable content regarding torture or cruel treatment.
ND
No observable content regarding recognition as a person before the law.
ND
No observable content regarding equal protection of the law.
ND
No observable content regarding effective remedy.
ND
No observable content regarding arbitrary detention.
ND
No observable content regarding fair public hearing.
ND
No observable content regarding presumption of innocence.
ND
No observable content regarding freedom of movement.
ND
No observable content regarding asylum.
ND
No observable content regarding nationality.
ND
No observable content regarding marriage or family.
ND
No observable content regarding property.
ND
No observable content regarding freedom of thought or religion.
ND
No observable content regarding assembly or association.
ND
No observable content regarding social security.
ND
No observable content regarding work or union rights.
ND
No observable content regarding rest and leisure.
ND
No observable content regarding standard of living.
ND
No observable content regarding education.
ND
No observable content regarding cultural life.
ND
No observable content regarding social order.
ND
No observable content regarding duties to community.
ND
No observable content regarding destruction of rights.
Structural Channel
What the site does
Element Modifier Affects Note Legal & Terms Privacy —
No accessible privacy policy found on this page. Standard government website analytics likely present. Terms of Service —
No accessible terms of service found on this page. Identity & Mission Mission +0.05 Preamble
Official U.S. Executive Branch site; mission to inform public implies public participation in government. Limited positive modifier for democratic governance values. Editorial Code —
No observable editorial or fact-checking standards visible on page. Ownership -0.05 Article 19 Article 21
Government-owned official channel for executive messaging may influence free expression evaluation toward caution re: power asymmetry. Access & Distribution Access Model +0.05 Preamble Article 19
Publicly accessible official government information at no cost. Limited positive modifier for information access. Ad/Tracking —
No commercial advertising observed on page. Accessibility —
White House website generally follows Section 508 compliance guidelines, but not observable on this specific page.
+0.05
Medium Framing Coverage
Page is an official government website providing information (positive for access). The 'Hall of Shame' and 'Leaderboard' structure creates a negative space for media entities.
0.00
Low Framing Advocacy
Landing page structure facilitates navigation to topics but contains aggressive labeling ('hall of shame').
0.00
Low Framing
No observable structural features promoting or hindering participation.
-0.20
Low Framing
Aggressive public naming ('Hall of Shame') may be seen as negatively impacting reputation.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
ND
No observable structural features.
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean.
Learn more How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.27 high claims
Sources 0.1 Evidence 0.2 Uncertainty 0.0 Purpose 0.8
3 manipulative rhetoric techniques found
3 techniques detected
name calling 'Fake News', 'serial offenders', 'Repeated Lies'
loaded language 'Hall of Shame', 'Media Offenders', 'exposed'
appeal to authority Published on official White House website as authoritative government position
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
confrontational
Valence -0.6 Arousal 0.8 Dominance 0.9
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.00
✗ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.18 problem only
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.15 2 perspectives
Speaks: government
About: corporation institution
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
present immediate
What geographic area does this content cover?
national United States
How accessible is this content to a general audience?
accessible low jargon general
Longitudinal
· 4 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail
14 entries all eval pipeline all models deepseek-v3.2 llama-4-scout-wai llama-3.3-70b-wai
newest first
2026-02-28 15:58 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.37 exceeds threshold (3 models) - - 2026-02-28 15:58 eval_success Evaluated: Neutral (-0.03) - - 2026-02-28 15:58 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 1W 0R - - 2026-02-28 15:58
eval
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2 : -0.03 (Neutral) 14,234 tokens +0.11 2026-02-28 15:53 eval_success Evaluated: Mild negative (-0.14) - - 2026-02-28 15:53 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.26 exceeds threshold (3 models) - - 2026-02-28 15:53
eval
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2 : -0.14 (Mild negative) 15,077 tokens 2026-02-28 15:53 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 1W 0R - - 2026-02-28 05:39 eval_success Light evaluated: Moderate negative (-0.38) - - 2026-02-28 05:39
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : -0.38 (Moderate negative) 2026-02-28 05:39 rater_validation_warn Light validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R - - 2026-02-28 05:18 eval_success Light evaluated: Moderate negative (-0.40) - - 2026-02-28 05:18
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : -0.40 (Moderate negative) 2026-02-28 05:18 rater_validation_warn Light validation warnings for model llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0W 1R - -