EFF's analysis of ICE's use of Palantir's ELITE tool demonstrates government abuse of Medicaid data to target immigrants for deportation without due process or consent. The article advocates strongly for privacy rights (Article 12), protection from arbitrary arrest (Article 9), and personal data rights (Article 17), while warning against government data consolidation patterns. The content champions human rights protections against surveillance overreach through litigation, advocacy, and calls for Congressional action.
Any time I see people say "I don't see why I should care about my privacy, I've got nothing to hide" I think about how badly things can go if the wrong people end up in positions of power.
The classic example here is what happens when someone is being stalked by an abusive ex-partner who works in law enforcement and has access to those databases.
This ICE stuff is that scaled up to a multi-billion dollar federal agency with, apparently, no accountability for following the law at all.
Why would Medicaid have the data of anyone who is at risk of immigration enforcement? The reported connection seems tenuous:
> The tool – dubbed Enhanced Leads Identification & Targeting for Enforcement (ELITE) – receives peoples’ addresses from the Department of Health and Human Services (which includes Medicaid) and other sources, 404 Media reports based on court testimony in Oregon by law enforcement agents, among other sources.
So, they have a tool that sucks up data from a bunch of different sources, including Medicaid. But there's no actual nexus between Medicaid and illegal immigrants in this reporting.
Undocumented immigrants/illegal immigrants are not generally eligible for federally funded Medicaid coverage in the United States, as federal law restricts such benefits to U.S. citizens and certain qualified immigrants with lawful status.
They are eligible for Emergency Medicaid, which covers emergency medical needs like labor and delivery or life-threatening conditions; hospitals that accept federal dollars for medicare/medicaid are required under federal law (EMTALA) to provide stabilizing emergency care regardless of immigration status or ability to pay.
Palantir is interesting. Founded by a closeted German, run by an Israeli operative, and a 3rd arm of the federal gov. I wish we could prosecute it in my lifetime for the numerous violations of privacy it undertakes, but the world does not work that way. The rich enjoy private jets subsidized by our hard-earned taxes, while violating ideals held by our Founding fathers (for what would Thiel or the current CEO know about our morals, when they have none and are American by name only.. their loyalties lie elsewhere)
There's no reason to believe that ICE, DHS or any other agencies will use this data carefully, judiciously or in good faith. Instead, it's quite clear at this point that all they will do is abuse the power they do have, execute and antagonize anyone they disagree with and then lie despite ample evidence to the contrary.
I'd say Palantir should be ashamed for facilitating this, but their entire business model is built around helping the government build an ever more invasive police state.
FWIW, people here illegally are already not eligible for Medicaid, [0] so it's hard to see why ICE having access to a roster of Medicaid enrollees would help them with their stated mission of enforcing removal orders.
Then again, we have ICE shooting American citizens in the streets, so I guess the law is whatever they decide it is, not least because our legislative branch is uninterested in laws.
I'm afraid of the day strongmen come into power in my country and start targeting people on their social media history. I'm sure to end on _some sort_ of naughty list. You kind of get how people become depoliticized and apathetic when resistance has no apparent effect and speaking up only gets you in trouble. That's how civic societies atrophy and die.
Medicaide data is pretty much covered by HIPPA. So Evil. Also it seems like it is too late, even if a court says do not do it, they will anyway and get away with it since the supreme court rules the president is allowed to break the law.
HELP I AM SOOOO F**NG ANGRY. Sorry I just don't have anywhere to safely put this rage.
The fourth amendment is basically gone at this point. Private companies can harvest location data from phones or facial recognition cameras/license plate readers in public spaces and sell that to entities like Palantir that aggregate it for government use (or for other commercial use). No warrants required, very little oversight (especially in this admin).
Medicaid-receiving immigrants could have their immigration status change, legal violations, emergency medicaid use, sometimes there's state funded coverage that immigrants are offered, etc. There's lots of reasons where Medicaid will have information on immigrants.
Also always keep in mind that what is legal today might be illegal tomorrow. This includes things like your ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation and much more.
You don't know today on which side of legality you will be in 10 years, even if your intentions are harmless.
They hold both that people whose citizenship depends on birthright citizenship are not in fact citizens and that naturalized citizens can be denaturalized either for disloyalty or based on some sham pretext. They also see people getting benefits as leaches worthy of targeting.
Also naturalized and birthright citizens are far more likely than others to associate or live with others of less legal status.
Naturalized and birthright citizens quality for benefits and they and their families are at risk.
If they are allowed to detain and deport without any due process as they have asserted anyone not white is at risk.
The DHS official social media presence shared a picture of an island paradise with the caption America after 100 million deportations.
This is the number of non-whites not the number of immigrants in even the most ridiculous estimates.
It reminds me of when Eric Schmidt, then CEO of google, tried that argument about people's worry of google collecting so much personal data. Some media outlet then published a bunch of personal information about Schmidt they had gathered using only google searches, including where he lives, his salary, his political donations, and where his kids went to school. Schmidt was not amused.
These tools are there to make sure no such leader ever gets to power, and to ensure the death of the free state. Luckily there's a constitutional amendment (and therefore a constitutional duty upon true Patriots) that has a patch for such regressions.
They're not just going after the so-called "illegal aliens", something made clear after the numerous extrajudicial killings by ICE officers recently, such as the one that occured yesterday.
People keep forgetting that it's possible to legally migrate, work for awhile, and so on, and then "become illegal" due to deadlines or administration issues.
An example every tech worker should understand is H1-B, where as an added bonus your employer can make you illegal.
Pam Bondi is now demanding voter rolls. It's clearly about suppressing liberal voters in liberal areas through a show of force. They're using this data to optimize who to harass.
> This ICE stuff is that scaled up to a multi-billion dollar federal agency with, apparently, no accountability for following the law at all.
Apparently any time they do anything horrifying, they will just declare that victim as a "terrorist" or something, and their sycophantic supporters will happily agree.
What I find amusing is that when the Snowden leaks happened and I would discuss it, when I said something like "let's pretend for a moment that we can't trust every single person in the government" I would usually get an agreeable laugh.
But using these same arguments with ICE + Palantir, these same people will say something like "ICE IS ONLY DEPORTING THE CRIMINALS YOU JUST WANT OPEN BORDERS!!!". People's hypocrisy knows no bounds.
The thing also is, it doesn't matter what the truth is. If the computer says you did a thing, the thugs (ICE) will do what they want.
Here is someone out for a walk, ICE demanding ID, that she answer questions. She says she's a US citizen ... they keep asking her questions and one of the ICE people seem to be using a phone to scan her face:
What she says, the truth, none of it would matter if his phone said to bring her in. And after the fact? The folks supporting ICE have made it clear they've no problem with lying in the face of the obvious.
It's not even that big of a leap. We've seen a off-duty ICE agent drunk driving his child, getting stopped by the cops, implied threats to one of the officers for being black with payback, spent the whole time saying "come on man" using his position as a federal officer as a way to get out of trouble, and ends to the point that I wanted to make, complained about his and I quote "bitch ex-wife" for divorcing him.
What is stopping this lowlife from going after his ex-wife, or one of those cops by using databases that they have access to? We know from journalists going through the process that there's no curation or training involved to join ICE specifically.
But this goes beyond them. We know that cops can be corrupt to, we know politicians can be corrupt to, what is stopping any of these people from using private data to not only go after their spouses, but also business rivals, and people who slight them?
My wife works in autism services in a predominantly Latino city. Those kids all have Medicaid, which includes info about their parents. It would be pretty trivial to cross reference with other data points to identify kids with undocumented parents and then you have their home address. Many of these kids go to a clinic everyday, so now you know when someone (likely a parent) is dropping them off too. She’s had patients with parents who have been picked up by ICE. I wouldn’t be surprised if that data came from Medicaid. It’s basically the same as the IRS data they’ve been using.
And it is next to impossible for average people to get adequate care for their kids with autism without Medicaid and early intervention can make the difference between someone who can live relatively independently with supports and someone who will spend their adult life chemically restrained in an institution. So they are in between a rock and a hard place.
How would they target people using voter rolls? Is the concern that it includes party affiliation? Couldn't they just provide the rolls without party affiliation?
Honestly it seems crazy even state governments know party affiliation. I know it's so they know who can vote in primaries etc, but it seems like you should just be able to register to vote with your party directly.
> FWIW, people here illegally are already not eligible for Medicaid, [0] so it's hard to see why ICE having access to a roster of Medicaid enrollees would help them with their stated mission of enforcing removal orders.
Presumably, it's because a lot of them are getting Medicaid despite not being eligible to. Isn't the point of every audit, investigation, etc. to find things that aren't being done correctly?
The “opposition” has never not funded ICE. Throwing out national level republicans is not enough, almost all national level democrats have to be thrown out too.
Palantir will never be prosecuted because they don't actually engage in any violations of privacy themselves or take possession of any data. They just sell software that enables it. And their main customer is the people who do the prosecuting. For the government prosecuting Palantir would be an admission of guilt, so it will never happen.
Reality is that once the next group is in power they keep all the same infra in place so they themselves can use it oft expanding it further. Then when they are kicked out, the next one comes in and does the same.
I dont like any of it but patriot act, covid vaccine tracking, flock, etc are all arms of the same hydra. This is just one more expanding arm of power and control in a long history of gov attempts to control populations.
There are a whole raft of "ideals" the Founding fathers held that we've obviated, beginning with who got the franchise. I can confidently say that government being the payor for ~50% of all healthcare, and operating the databases necessary to monitor all the money and behavior, was certainly not among their "ideals" either.
This was predicted by many, long ago. The predictions were ignored because they were inconvenient to desires and ambitions. Yet here we are. One wonders if it were known at the time, before we constructed these schemes, that one day there would be fabulous machines that would wade through all the (predicted) streams of data, hunting people, if perhaps those predictions might have been heard.
The cynic in me says "no." At some point, as the streams of politics oscillate, they occasionally converge very strongly, and all doubts are overcome, and the ratchet makes another click.
But it's not all bad news. In the natural course of events there is a high probability that one day, you'll have such folk as you prefer back at the helm, and they'll have these tools at the ready. If you make the most of it, you'll never have to suffer the current crowd ever again!
Article's central advocacy theme is privacy violations through government repurposing Medicaid data for immigration enforcement without consent.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article focuses on ICE accessing Medicaid data (a healthcare-specific database) for immigration enforcement purposes unrelated to healthcare.
Palantir's ELITE tool is described as receiving 'peoples' addresses from the Department of Health and Human Services (which includes Medicaid) and other sources.'
EFF's Executive Director is quoted: 'While couched in the benign language of eliminating government data silos, this plan runs roughshod over your privacy and security.'
Inferences
The article advocates that health and welfare data should not be repurposed for law enforcement without explicit consent, establishing privacy as a fundamental right.
The detailed technical description of how Medicaid data is captured and weaponized demonstrates the article's concern for digital privacy violations.
The comparison to Total Information Awareness programs frames data consolidation for surveillance as a historical threat to privacy that must be stopped.
Article advocates for human dignity and fundamental freedoms against government surveillance consolidation, explicitly referencing the preamble's human rights principles.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article describes a government surveillance tool (ELITE) that consolidates data from multiple sources including Medicaid for law enforcement targeting.
The article references Total Information Awareness programs from the 2000s that were rejected due to public outcry and explicitly calls for similar resistance to current data consolidation.
Inferences
By comparing current surveillance expansion to previously rejected Total Information Awareness programs, the article frames government data consolidation as violating human dignity.
The article advocates that fundamental principles against centralized government control must override bureaucratic convenience.
Article's central focus is ICE using surveillance tools to identify individuals for detention/deportation, constituting arbitrary arrest targeting.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article describes Palantir's ELITE tool as populating 'a map with potential deportation targets' based on algorithmic analysis.
The article states 'ICE is using it to find locations where lots of people it might detain could be based,' demonstrating arbitrary targeting without due process.
Inferences
The article argues that algorithmic targeting for immigration enforcement constitutes arbitrary arrest violating protection from arbitrary detention.
The article emphasizes that targeting is automated and systematic, not based on individual criminal conduct.
Article discusses differential law enforcement targeting of immigrants, highlighting discrimination in surveillance and deportation enforcement.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article focuses on ICE using government databases to specifically target immigrant populations for enforcement purposes not intended by the data collection.
Inferences
The article frames differential targeting of immigrants by ICE as discrimination in law enforcement.
Article frames Medicaid data as personal property being appropriated without consent for unintended purposes, violating property rights in personal data.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article discusses Medicaid data (personal health records) being used without consent for immigration enforcement.
The article references EFF litigation 'challenging ICE's grab for Medicaid data' and 'taxpayer data,' framing government data seizure as property rights violation.
Inferences
The article frames personal data as property that individuals have rights over, and that government appropriation without consent violates property rights.
The use of terms like 'grab' positions government data collection as unlawful appropriation of personal information.
Article discusses deportation targeting that restricts freedom of movement for vulnerable populations.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article discusses ICE using surveillance to identify individuals for deportation, which directly restricts freedom of movement.
Inferences
The article frames deportation targeting as violating freedom of movement by using surveillance to restrict individuals' ability to travel or reside freely.
Article discusses surveillance targeting of vulnerable immigrant populations, implying violations of equal dignity and treatment before the law.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article describes ICE using algorithmic targeting to identify specific populations for enforcement based on their participation in welfare programs.
Inferences
The article implies that targeting immigrants specifically for surveillance-based enforcement violates principles of equal dignity.
Article discusses differential enforcement targeting immigrants specifically while other populations are not targeted, violating equal application of law.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article describes ICE specifically targeting immigrants using surveillance tools, creating differential treatment in law enforcement.
Inferences
The article argues that targeting specific populations for enforcement violates equality before the law.
Article discusses due process violations through algorithmic 'confidence scores' bypassing fair trial procedures.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article describes the tool providing 'confidence scores' on individuals' locations, which serves as the basis for enforcement action without prior judicial determination.
Inferences
The article implies that algorithmic confidence scores cannot substitute for judicial determination and due process protections.
Article discusses surveillance systems that treat individuals as guilty based on algorithmic scoring rather than presuming innocence.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article describes the ELITE tool providing 'confidence scores' that target individuals without any determination of criminal guilt or immigration violation.
Inferences
The article argues that algorithmic confidence scores bypass the presumption of innocence by treating individuals as targets based purely on data analysis.
Article discusses protesters' rights and mentions government threats to use military against lawful assembly and free speech.
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
The article references 'Minneapolis protests' and mentions 'President Trump has threatened to use the Insurrection Act of 1807 to deploy military troops against protestors.'
The article emphasizes call to action: 'It's time to cry out again,' invoking public discourse as a necessary response.
Inferences
The article advocates for protection of protesters' free speech and assembly rights against government threats.
Article discusses limits on government power to consolidate and use data, framing appropriate limitations on governmental authority.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The article states: 'Different government agencies necessarily collect information... but the danger comes when the government begins pooling that data and using it for reasons unrelated to the purpose it was collected.'
Inferences
The article advocates that governments' rights to collect data must be limited to their original purposes, preventing misuse.
Domain mission centers on privacy protection. EFF maintains Privacy Badger and Surveillance Self-Defense tools. Strong track record of privacy advocacy.
Terms of Service
+0.05
Article 29
Standard TOS language; no significant human rights restrictions observed.
Identity & Mission
Mission
+0.28
Article 1 Article 19 Article 20
EFF explicitly champions free speech, privacy, and digital rights. Mission statement aligned with UDHR values.
Editorial Code
+0.12
Article 19
Editorial independence evident; no editorial policy discovered that undermines human rights discourse.
Ownership
+0.08
Article 19 Article 25
Nonprofit 501(c)(3) structure; no profit-driven ownership conflicts observed.
Access & Distribution
Access Model
+0.15
Article 19 Article 26
Content freely accessible; no paywall or access restrictions.
EFF's organizational mission and litigation practice demonstrate structural commitment to protecting foundational human rights and preventing government overreach.
build 1ad9551+j7zs · deployed 2026-03-02 09:09 UTC · evaluated 2026-03-02 13:57:54 UTC
Support HN HRCB
Each evaluation uses real API credits. HN HRCB runs on donations — no ads, no paywalls.
If you find it useful, please consider helping keep it running.