| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
| Summary ~lite The author strongly criticizes GitHub Actions based on a frustrating personal experience.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 5 evals | |
Audit Trail
10 entries | 2026-03-05 10:40 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 10:40 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 10:29 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.330 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 10:29 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.33 (Moderate negative) | | | 2026-03-02 20:28 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-03-02 20:28 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Editorial complaining about GitHub Actions, no human rights discussion | | 2026-03-02 20:28 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-03-02 20:28 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | | | reasoning tech rant no rights stance | | 2026-03-02 20:23 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-03-02 20:23 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) | | | reasoning tech rant no rights stance | | |
| |