Model Comparison
Model Editorial Structural Class Conf SETL Theme
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite +0.70 ND Strong positive 0.90 0.00 Privacy Rights
@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite +0.70 ND Strong positive 0.90 0.00 Privacy Rights
Section @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite Delta
Preamble ND ND
Article 1 ND ND
Article 2 ND ND
Article 3 ND ND
Article 4 ND ND
Article 5 ND ND
Article 6 ND ND
Article 7 ND ND
Article 8 ND ND
Article 9 ND ND
Article 10 ND ND
Article 11 ND ND
Article 12 ND ND
Article 13 ND ND
Article 14 ND ND
Article 15 ND ND
Article 16 ND ND
Article 17 ND ND
Article 18 ND ND
Article 19 ND ND
Article 20 ND ND
Article 21 ND ND
Article 22 ND ND
Article 23 ND ND
Article 24 ND ND
Article 25 ND ND
Article 26 ND ND
Article 27 ND ND
Article 28 ND ND
Article 29 ND ND
Article 30 ND ND
+0.70 Suspicionless ChatControl must be taboo in a state governed by the rule of law (digitalcourage.social)
277 points by nabla9 145 days ago | 134 comments on HN | Strong positive ~lite vlite-1.4
Summary ~lite Privacy Rights Advocates
Author advocates against suspicionless ChatControl
EQ 0.80
SO 0.70
TD 0.90
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
Longitudinal · 3 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 6 entries
2026-02-28 15:03 eval_success Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.70) - -
2026-02-28 15:03 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive) 0.00
reasoning
Editorial stance against suspicionless ChatControl
2026-02-28 14:58 eval_success Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.70) - -
2026-02-28 14:58 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive)
reasoning
Editorial stance against suspicionless ChatControl
2026-02-28 14:48 eval_success Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.70) - -
2026-02-28 14:48 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.70 (Strong positive)
reasoning
CO advocacy for privacy rights