1214 points by jbegley 325 days ago | 960 comments on HN
| Moderate positive
Contested
Editorial · v3.7· 2026-02-28 08:09:16 0
Summary Digital Censorship & Expression Advocates
This investigative article documents Israel's government-coordinated campaign of content removal on Meta platforms, where 94% of Israeli government takedown requests were complied with, resulting in systematic suppression of pro-Palestine expression across 60+ countries, with overwhelming targeting of Arab and Muslim-majority populations. The content strongly advocates for free expression and non-discrimination rights while exposing how corporate-government partnerships enable mass censorship and perpetuate discriminatory speech restrictions through artificial intelligence training.
I like to think we are in a better place than russia for instance with all its propaganda and jailed journalists, but then i see these kind of article come over and over....
Most of the people in the 'free world' goes on mainstream media, like facebook to get their news. These companies are enticed to 'suck up' to the government because at the end they are business, they need to be in good term with ruling class.
you end up with most media complying with the official story pushed by government and friends, and most people believing that because no one has the time to fact check everything.
One could argue that the difference with russia is that someone can actually look for real information, but even in russia people have access to vpn to bypass the censorship.
Another difference would be that you are allowed to express your opinion, whereas in russia you would be put to jail, that's true but only in a very limited way. Since everyone goes on mainstream media and they enforce the government narrative, you can't speak there. you are merely allowed to speak out in your little corner out of reach to anyone, and even then since most people believe the government propaganda, your arguments won't be heard at all.
The more i think about it, the less difference i see.
So when the government pointed to the disproportionate support for Palestine on TikTok vs Instagram, it was actually because Instagram was suppressing it. It is ironic.
Realistically, how can we uncover this type of foreign interference? As in, is there any hack someone in our community can perform to expose Israeli propaganda? Israel locked journalists out of Ghaza, and has pretty much dominion over social media in the US. How can someone remain informed or expose misinformation campaigns (ideally without repercussions, which is a dangerous control they have over our gov)?
The role of the media (including social media) is to move in lockstep with US domestic and foreign policy. This has been known for some time [1]. It's never as simple as the White House calling up Mark Zuckerberg and saying "hey, silence X". It's about a series of filters that decides who is in the media and who has their thumb on the algorithmic scales, as per the famous Noam Chomsky Andrew Marr interview [2] ("What I'm saying is if you believed something different, you wouldn't be sitting where you're sitting").
Noam Chomsky is a national treasure.
When a former Netanyahu adviser and Israeli embassy staffer seemingly has the power to suppress pro-Palestinian speech on Meta platforms [3], nobody should be surprised.
If you're a US citizen who is a journalist critical of a key US ally, that ally is allowed to assassinate you without any objection of repercussions [4].
This is also why Tiktok originally got banned in a bipartisan fashion: the Apartheid Defense League director Jonathon Goldblatt said (in leaked audio) "we have a Tiktok problem" [5] and weeks later it was banned. Tiktok simply suppresses pro-Palestinian speech less than other platforms.
Not a surprise. I remember last year seeing that posts to https://www.birdsofgaza.com/ were being blocked, and it's hard to think of a more innocuous way of speaking out.
"Meta has complied with 94% of takedown requests issued by Israel...Meta removed over 90,000 posts to comply with TDRs submitted by the Israeli government in an average of 30 seconds...All of the Israeli government’s TDRs post-October 7th contain the exact same complaint text, according to the leaked information, regardless of the substance of the underlying content being challenged. Sources said that not a single Israeli TDR describes the exact nature of the content being reported"
Just want to call out that the head of the trust and safety/integrity division, Guy Rosen, is an Israeli citizen with a strong pro-Israel bias. He’s also a person of questionable morals. From Wikipedia:
“ Guy Rosen and Roi Tiger founded Onavo in 2010. In October 2013, Onavo was acquired by Facebook, which used Onavo's analytics platform to monitor competitors. This influenced Facebook to make various business decisions, including its 2014 acquisition of WhatsApp.
Since the acquisition, Onavo was frequently classified as being spyware, as the VPN was used to monetize application usage data collected within an allegedly privacy-focused environment.”
That Meta considered his questionable ethics a feature not a bug, and repeatedly promoted him, is very problematic.
The missing part of this article: are the requests valid? Are they actually incitements to terrorism and violence or is it just a clamp down on criticism? The headline of the article implies the latter but the body does not provide any evidence for that.
Like there is a war going on, a pretty nasty one at that. I would expect there to be quite a lot of incitement to violence related to that. I would expect the israeli government to be mostly concerned with incitements of violence against its citizens. In the context of this conflict i would expect such incitements to be mostly be made by the demographics cited in the article due to the nature of the conflict. The article seems like it could be entirely consistent with take downs being used appropriately. It needs more then this to prove its headline.
Heck, from this post we dont even know relative numbers. How does this compare against take down requests from other groups?
“According to internal communications reviewed by Drop Site, as recently as March, Cutler actively instructed employees of the company to search for and review content mentioning Ghassan Kanafani, an Arab novelist considered to be a pioneer of Palestinian literature.”
So this person is actively thinking about a Palestinian revolutionary that was assassinated by Mossad over half a century ago, and is using their position to push for internal censorship of him accordingly.
Imagine if a Palestinian employee at Meta suggested censoring mentions of past members of Haganah.
One off test, but for this guy, with large BSky and Twitter accounts, made the same pro-UA post on both, the post on Twitter was suppressed for about 12 hours, until it was spammed by hate bots, and then was made widely visible. The BSky post had lots of responses, starting from the moment of posting, almost wholly pro-UA.
This is the same reason they want to buy TikTok and banned it had nothing to do with Chinese influence it was that the censoring of pro Palestinian content was not being done like in western platforms and Israel and Israel bought US politicians did not like it.
If Apartheid South Africa could last just a little bit longer, they would still be an apartheid state like Israel is today.
Western media is just as complicit in this genocide as the fascists in charge of the Israeli government. And media are self-censoring which is reprehensible.
The idea of Hamas wouldn't exist if Gaza (and the West Bank) wasn't occupied by land, air and sea; their land stolen on a daily basis, and Palestinian people treated as subhuman animals.
Our minds have been so colonized or beaten down by powerful forces that _any_ support of the plight of the Palestine people is seen as pro-Hamas, even if I shout at the top of my voice that I don't care for the armed factions and political jockeying of either side.
I just re-read the article, and there’s no evidence of wrong doing. There’s a bunch of circumstantial stuff that people are choosing to feed into their narrative.
Facebook has some rules and community guidelines, the Israeli government recognized some posts that violate those and asked for them to be taken down, and Facebook complied in accordance to their own rules.
Indeed. The editorial boards of these newsrooms are often staffed with people who attended the same schools and classes as those running the country. The social circles of the two worlds are extremely closely linked.
Of course, this means that the reporting isn't very good at addressing its blind spots–i.e., most of the news in the country, let alone the world, that isn't relevant to the ivy league coastal elites. And I say this as a member of that same class. Most of the political perspectives in my life are completely unrepresented in the opinion columns, which generally tend to pander upwards rather than downwards.
I don't tend to put much weight in freedom of the press so long as that press is floating on the cream of society and asking the government permission to report on what they're doing.
It sounds like you're using the fact that the posts aren't available for you to view to evaluate as a weakness of the reporting on this suppression campaign, but of course they're not available because of the suppression campaign.
Surely the burden should be on the censors to establish clearly that something is in fact incitement to violence, rather than on external reporters to magically show that content which has been taken down is not incitement?
I am part of a neighborhood group where I grew up in Bangladesh and lived until 5th grade in the 90s.
The group admin this morning let us know via Facebook post that he has received warnings frm Facebook. The group is "at a risk of being suspended" because way too many posts relating to "dangerous organization and individuals" have been removed. He wants everyone to be extra careful when posting about p*l*s*i*e, I*r*e*, g*z*, j*w* etc. He used asterisks himself just to be extra careful himself.
Not to mention my country is dealing with rohingya crisis, which was fueled by Facebook and WhatsApp misinformation campaigns, and Facebook had 2 moderators for the whole country of Myanmar and refused to do anything about said misinformation campaigns. But they sure make exceptions for I*r*e*.
Every pro Palestinian protestor has experienced some form of awareness suppression and content removal. They have known this was a thing long before anyone else did.
Same thing happened during 9/11. Muslims saw suppression, bullying by the police and no one covered it. Then the tables turned on maga republicans after j6.
If you have valid rules but in practice only enforce them against a single group, then in some sense you are asking the wrong question.
In other words, for people who assume rule enforcement is supposed to be fair, they see unfair enforcement as hypocrisy. However, if you just see enforcement as another tool to wield against enemies, hypocrisy is irrelevant. What matters is power. It’s my basketball, I make the rules.
I was there during the onavo scandal. It was straight up spyware. They would regularly show graphs of snapchat usage vs messenger vs whatsapp and the snapchat data was explicitly attributed to onovo logs.
Since nobody here has actually read the article, it states that the reason the posts were taken down was "prohibits incitement to terrorism praise for acts of terrorism and identification or support of terror organizations." This type of speech (incitement) is illegal in the United States and support is very borderline depending on the type and meaning of "support". Now, if the reason doesnt match the actual content removed that should definitely be addressed which is your point, but I think that the reason is valid.
Russia doesn’t just put people in jail for speaking against the government. They weaponise the generational fear of being disappeared by the government. This is not close to what happens in America where you can post anything anywhere and if Facebook deletes it you can always make your own website about it. If you did this in Russia you go to jail. Even if you say things like “it is sad Ukrainian children die in children’s day in Russia” you go to jail. I don’t think you can compare modern USA with modern Russia in this way. USA does plenty of other things that are bad like jailing so many people for petty crimes without pushing much on speech. USA has its own problems and all these comparisons only hide them.
While this may be part of the story, it's certainly not the full picture. We know that the CCP is actively manipulating the algorithm on Tiktok to further their agenda on multiple other geopolitical issues—something we have ample evidence for. I don't know if there is a smoking gun on this one topic in particular, but the CCP's goal has always been to divide the American audience; and we know that older Americans skew pro-Israel whilst younger Americans are more oriented towards being pro-Palestinian. If someone looked in the right places, they would more likely than not find evidence of algorithm manipulation to favor a Palestinian bend.
The article does mention it, but I agree that the story is incomplete without a clearer idea (including examples) of what is being censored.
> "A Human Rights Watch (HRW) report investigating Meta’s moderation of pro-Palestine content post-October 7th found that, of 1,050 posts HRW documented as taken-down or suppressed on Facebook or Instagram, 1,049 involved peaceful content in support of Palestine, while just one post was content in support of Israel."
>Another difference would be that you are allowed to express your opinion, whereas in russia you would be put to jail, that's true but only in a very limited way.
Although not even close in number and punishment the US government is deporting people for speaking against Israel.
I think we do have a much better system because we are aware of these cases, you can speak out about the issue, and our court system can rule against the current admin.
What makes this possible to either the level of Russia or the US is how much the supporters of the regime want it. This is regardless of morality, legality, or the precedent it sets.
One defense against it might just be to actively crawl Facebook and externally record the contents of posts as soon as they're posted. Then you have a record of everything that got deleted.
I don't know how you scale that up to make it easy for everyone to find "disappeared" content on any platform. Maybe some kind of peer-to-peer system where everyone's browser cache basically acts as a searchable archive, with a browser plugin that inserts a button into web pages to show disappeared content.
(It's also worth noting that probably a lot of content that was removed by moderators was removed for a legitimate reason. So, ideally you'd have some sort of crowd moderation to get rid of the stuff that really is spam or hate speech or whatever.)
"The Ma'ale Akrabim massacre, known in English as the Scorpions Pass Massacre, was an attack on an Israeli passenger bus, carried out on 17 March 1954, in the middle of the day. Eleven passengers were shot dead by the attackers who ambushed and boarded the bus. One passenger died 32 years later of his injuries, in a state of paralysis and partial consciousness. Four passengers survived, two of whom had been injured by the gunmen."
Palestinians are largely in the reality they're in due to the violence.
It's a conspiracy theory. Plenty of Israeli citizens support Palestinian rights and are opposed to what their government is doing. The guilt by association leads to things like antisemitism and anti-Palestinian hate and all the rest.
> Our minds have been so colonized or beaten down by powerful forces that _any_ support of the plight of the Palestine people is seen as pro-Hamas,
What makes you say that? Plenty of people express support for the Palestinian people, including plenty of governments and heads of state, etc.
I personally think that being pro-Palestine means you should be anti-Hamas, since they are a brutal dictatorship that's plundered its people's resources to engage in a war with Israel that has destroyed their lives.
The main worrying thing is when someone is not pro-Palestinian, they're either pro-Hamas or anti-Israel.
> The missing part of this article: are the requests valid?
They are enforced with neither human nor AI review, so the reality is that we don't know. They are enforced by virtue of who submits them, with no question on whether they are valid or not.
Having heard from friends the kind of censorship they face on the topic on Facebook and Instagram when discussing the topics at hand, I know of plenty of situations where people were censored without breaking any rules. They're a small sample of course.
> Officers “beat up Kamardin very badly and stuck a dumbbell in his anus,” according to Novaya Gazeta Europe.
2. Bald man claim to power was accompanies with mysterious explosions of apartment buildings after which Chechens were declared enemies and war started.
Some interesting bits from wikipedia:
> Three Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) agents who had planted the devices at Ryazan were arrested by the local police.[6] The next day, FSB director Nikolai Patrushev announced that the incident in Ryazan had been an anti-terror drill and the device found there contained only sugar, and freed the FSB agents involved.[7]
And
> 13 September 1999: Russian Duma speaker Gennadiy Seleznyov makes an announcement about the bombing of an apartment building in the city of Volgodonsk that only takes place three days later
> 16 September 1999: Bombing in Volgodonsk, 17 are killed, 69 injured
That's because the Palestine protests are full of people who actually are pro-Hamas, and not only that but often rabidly antisemite on top of that. Your side linked the two together for whatever reason.
It’s not only about suppression; it’s about cultivating fear around expressing your opinions.
There are groups actively working to have individuals fired for voicing support for Palestine.
For instance, a woman wrote “Freedom for Palestine” in Gaelic on LinkedIn, prompting a group of Israelis in a WhatsApp chat to actively coordinate efforts to get her fired.
The General Manager of Wix, Batsheva (Levine) Moshe, responded in a WhatsApp chat saying:
“Hi yes we know. Being taken care of since it was published. I believe there will be an announcement soon regarding our reaction.”
do you feel like it is “Israel’s war on Gaza”? Does that represent reality fully? Is that what children should be taught, that there is a demonic people that kills children? You don’t see any problem with omitting the massacre of israeli civilians, the captured hostages and many thousands of rocket launches towards densely populated civilian communities? is that how we achieve peace in your view?
From the lost of countries and knowing how rampant antisemitism is in these countries I suspect majority of the request are valid and express support and urge for terrorism.
Ask anyone who works at Meta if they are valid, and they themselves will tell you, they don't really know. That should let you know how easy it would be for Israel to wield this tool in their favor. If they actually are doing it unfairly or not, we can never know since these posts are automatically taken down without human review.
Article's core advocacy champions freedom of opinion and expression through investigative documentation of massive, systematic censorship campaign. Article exposes removal of 38.8 million posts, 94% compliance with government requests, and training of AI systems on censored content to perpetuate suppression.
FW Ratio: 63%
Observable Facts
Article's opening statement: 'A sweeping crackdown on posts on Instagram and Facebook that are critical of Israel—or even vaguely supportive of Palestinians—was directly orchestrated by the government of Israel.'
Article reports 'The data show that Meta has complied with 94% of takedown requests issued by Israel since October 7, 2023.'
Article states 'Meta removed over 90,000 posts to comply with TDRs submitted by the Israeli government in an average of 30 seconds.'
Article documents 'Meta also significantly expanded automated takedowns since October 7, resulting in an estimated 38.8 million additional posts being "actioned upon" across Facebook and Instagram.'
Meta insider quote: 'Israel's censorship project will echo well into the future, insiders said, as the AI program Meta is currently training how to moderate content will base future decisions on the successful takedown of content critical of Israel's genocide.'
Inferences
The documented removal of 38.8 million posts represents the most systematic suppression of free expression in the observable content sample.
Feeding enforcement decisions into AI systems perpetuates censorship indefinitely through algorithmic amplification of biased choices.
The article's investigative journalism serves a watchdog function essential to free expression by exposing hidden censorship mechanisms.
Article extensively documents systematic discrimination in content enforcement based on nationality and ethnicity, with overwhelming evidence of unequal targeting of Arab and Muslim-majority nations.
FW Ratio: 57%
Observable Facts
Article states 'Only 1.3% of Israel's takedown requests target Israeli users' compared to 63% for Malaysia and 95% for Brazil.
Article documents top 12 affected countries: Egypt (21.1%), Jordan (16.6%), Palestine (15.6%), Algeria (8.2%), Yemen (7.5%), with remaining Arab/Muslim-majority nations comprising 30%+ of total.
Article reports 'Of 1,050 posts HRW documented as taken-down or suppressed on Facebook or Instagram, 1,049 involved peaceful content in support of Palestine.'
Article states 'Israel's takedown requests have overwhelmingly targeted users from Arab and Muslim-majority nations in a massive effort to silence criticism of Israel.'
Inferences
The geographic targeting pattern demonstrates systematic discrimination based on nationality and ethnicity, violating equal protection principles.
The 1,049-of-1,050 ratio showing peaceful Palestinian content removals reveals discriminatory enforcement absent from other speech categories.
The article explicitly champions non-discrimination by documenting and exposing these disparities.
Article advocates for recognition of fundamental human rights and dignity by documenting and exposing systematic violations of core UDHR principles through mass censorship.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
Article states 'Meta has complied with 94% of takedown requests issued by Israel since October 7, 2023.'
Article describes this pattern as 'the largest mass censorship operation in modern history.'
Multiple Meta insiders are cited as confirming authenticity of the leaked data.
Inferences
The documented systematic compliance represents fundamental violation of Preamble's faith in human rights principles.
The article's investigation advocates for recognition and protection of these rights against mass suppression.
Article champions democratic participation by serving as investigative journalism that exposes government-corporate censorship partnerships and identifies actors in surveillance/suppression systems.
Article exposes due process violations by documenting boilerplate takedown requests without individualized content assessment and automatic removal without human review.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
Article states 'All of the Israeli government's TDRs post-October 7th contain the exact same complaint text, according to the leaked information, regardless of the substance of the underlying content.'
Article reports 'Not a single Israeli TDR describes the exact nature of the content being reported, even though the requests link to an average of 15 different pieces of content.'
Article documents 'Meta has overwhelmingly complied with Israel's requests, making an exception for the government account by taking down posts without human reviews.'
Inferences
Use of boilerplate complaints for diverse content demonstrates absence of individualized review essential to fair process.
Automatic removal without human moderator assessment violates minimal procedural fairness standards for speech restrictions.
Article advocates for freedom of conscience and thought by documenting suppression of content about Palestinian intellectual and literary figures, restricting diversity of ideas.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article documents that 'Jordana Cutler has continued to demand the review of content related to Kanafani, an Arab novelist considered to be a pioneer of Palestinian literature.'
Article reports Cutler 'instructed employees of the company to search for and review content mentioning Ghassan Kanafani' using Meta policy on 'Glorification, Support or Representation' of individuals.
Inferences
Systematic targeting of intellectual and literary figures suppresses freedom of thought and diversity of intellectual exchange.
The article advocates for this freedom by exposing suppression of Palestinian intellectual and cultural heritage.
Article advocates for freedom of assembly and association by documenting removal of content expressing political solidarity, preventing digital organization around shared causes.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article documents removal of posts expressing support for Palestinian causes, preventing digital assembly around political viewpoint.
Page includes reader comment section enabling public discussion and association around the censorship issue.
Inferences
Suppression of pro-Palestine expression limits ability of individuals to associate and organize around shared political causes.
The platform's comment structure and open publication support reader association and collaborative discourse.
Article advocates for social and international order based on human rights by exposing systematic failure of Meta's corporate governance to protect expression rights across 60+ countries.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article documents that 'users from over 60 countries have reported censorship of content related to Palestine.'
Investigation exposes Meta's failure to implement human rights protections despite awareness of Israeli censorship campaign for at least seven years.
Inferences
The international scope reveals systemic failure of global corporate and legal order to protect expression rights across jurisdictions.
The article advocates for an international order that enforces human rights protections against corporate-government collusion.
Article documents removal of educational content about Palestinian literary and cultural figures, limiting access to educational material about Palestinian intellectual history.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article documents demand for removal of content about 'Ghassan Kanafani, an Arab novelist considered to be a pioneer of Palestinian literature.'
Cutler used Meta role to flag content mentioning Kanafani, limiting access to educational material about Palestinian intellectual figures.
Inferences
Removal of content about Palestinian literary figures limits educational access to Palestinian intellectual and cultural heritage.
The suppression constrains readers' ability to engage with important Palestinian contributions to world literature and culture.
Article documents systematic suppression of expression rights through government-directed takedowns and AI training, advocating against destruction of UDHR rights.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article documents systematic suppression of expression rights through government-directed removal of 38.8 million posts.
Article documents training of AI systems on censored content to 'base future decisions on the successful takedown of content critical of Israel.'
Inferences
The coordination between government and corporation aims to permanently suppress rights through algorithmic systems trained on censored content.
The article advocates against this destruction of UDHR rights by exposing the mechanism.
No privacy policy visible on provided content; independent news publication model suggests standard privacy practices but not evaluated on-domain.
Terms of Service
—
Terms of service not visible on provided content.
Identity & Mission
Mission
+0.15
Article 19 Article 3
Publisher self-describes as 'Independent news on politics and war' with ~100k subscribers, indicating editorial mission aligned with free expression and investigative accountability journalism.
Editorial Code
—
No editorial standards document visible on provided content.
Ownership
—
Independent Substack-based publication; ownership structure not detailed in provided content.
Access & Distribution
Access Model
+0.10
Article 19
Article marked 'isAccessibleForFree: true' with open subscription model, supporting broad access to information.
Ad/Tracking
—
Advertising/tracking practices not visible in provided content.
Accessibility
—
Accessibility features not evaluated from provided content excerpt.
Independent journalism platform enables investigation and publication of censorship violations; free access and comments section support reader expression and discourse about expression rights.
Platform includes comment section enabling reader association and political discourse; open access supports formation of communities around shared viewpoints.
Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.56 (Moderate positive)
2026-02-28 01:41
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Leaked data reveals Israeli govt campaign to remove pro-Palestine posts on Meta
--
2026-02-28 01:38
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-28 01:37
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-28 01:36
dlq_replay
DLQ message 97707 replayed to LLAMA_QUEUE: Leaked data reveals Israeli govt campaign to remove pro-Palestine posts on Meta
--
2026-02-28 00:00
eval_success
Light evaluated: Strong positive (0.80)
--
2026-02-28 00:00
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.80 (Strong positive)
2026-02-27 23:30
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Leaked data reveals Israeli govt campaign to remove pro-Palestine posts on Meta
--
2026-02-27 23:28
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-27 23:27
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-27 23:26
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-27 23:22
eval_success
Evaluated: Neutral (0.06)
--
2026-02-27 23:22
eval
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.06 (Neutral) 11,661 tokens
2026-02-27 23:11
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Leaked data reveals Israeli govt campaign to remove pro-Palestine posts on Meta
--
2026-02-27 23:11
eval_retry
OpenRouter error 400 model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-27 23:11
eval_failure
Evaluation failed: Error: OpenRouter API error 400: {"error":{"message":"This endpoint's maximum context length is 65536 tokens. However, you requested about 76852 tokens (75828 of text input, 1024 in the output). Pleas
--
2026-02-27 23:11
eval_retry
OpenRouter error 400 model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-27 23:11
eval_failure
Evaluation failed: Error: OpenRouter API error 400: {"error":{"message":"This endpoint's maximum context length is 65536 tokens. However, you requested about 76852 tokens (75828 of text input, 1024 in the output). Pleas
--
2026-02-27 23:11
eval_retry
OpenRouter error 400 model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-27 23:11
eval_failure
Evaluation failed: Error: OpenRouter API error 400: {"error":{"message":"This endpoint's maximum context length is 65536 tokens. However, you requested about 76852 tokens (75828 of text input, 1024 in the output). Pleas
--
2026-02-27 22:56
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Leaked data reveals Israeli govt campaign to remove pro-Palestine posts on Meta
--
2026-02-27 22:56
eval_retry
OpenRouter error 400 model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-27 22:41
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.90 (Strong positive)
2026-02-27 22:32
eval
Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5: +0.72 (Strong positive)