| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
| Summary ~lite Article discusses the implications of banning words in the name of equity.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 4 evals | |
Audit Trail
9 entries | 2026-03-07 22:23 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-07 22:23 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-07 22:22 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.240 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-07 22:22 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.24 (Mild negative) | | | 2026-03-07 22:21 | model_divergence | Cross-model spread 0.63 exceeds threshold (2 models) | - - | | 2026-03-07 22:21 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.16) | - - | | 2026-03-07 22:21 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Editorial stance on equity language, transparency indicators in article | | 2026-03-07 22:20 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate negative (-0.47) | - - | | 2026-03-07 22:20 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.47 (Moderate negative) | | | reasoning Editorial critiques equity language guides | | |
| |