| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite Discussion on Apple alternatives shows community resilience and trust.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 7 evals | |
Audit Trail
14 entries | 2026-03-05 17:05 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.600 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 17:05 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.60 (Strong positive) 0.00 | | | 2026-03-05 17:00 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.600 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 17:00 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.60 (Strong positive) | | | 2026-03-05 16:55 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.419 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 16:55 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.42 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | | | 2026-03-05 16:51 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.419 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 16:51 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.42 (Moderate positive) | | | 2026-03-04 02:47 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.11) | - - | | 2026-03-04 02:47 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.11 (Mild positive) +0.03 | | | reasoning Tech forum discussion on Apple alternatives | | 2026-03-04 02:44 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.24) | - - | | 2026-03-04 02:44 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.24 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Discussion of Apple alternatives due to CSAM controversy, privacy-focused choices | | 2026-03-04 02:42 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.08) | - - | | 2026-03-04 02:42 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.08 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Tech forum discussion on Apple alternatives | | |
| |