| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
| Summary ~lite Free Speech Advocates Article discusses 'Call of Duty' winning a First Amendment victory.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 6 evals | |
Audit Trail
12 entries | 2026-03-07 22:04 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (-0.06) | - - | | 2026-03-07 22:04 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.06 (Neutral) 0.00 | | | reasoning Editorial discusses First Amendment victory, implicitly supportive of rights. | | 2026-03-07 21:59 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (-0.06) | - - | | 2026-03-07 21:59 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.06 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Editorial discusses First Amendment victory, implicitly supportive of rights. | | 2026-03-07 21:55 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.16) | - - | | 2026-03-07 21:55 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) 0.00 | | | reasoning Editorial on First Amendment victory | | 2026-03-07 21:50 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.16) | - - | | 2026-03-07 21:50 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Editorial on First Amendment victory | | 2026-03-07 02:39 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-07 02:39 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-07 02:38 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.034 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-07 02:38 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.03 (Neutral) | | | |
| |