1216 points by ingve 2189 days ago | 343 comments on HN
| Mild positive Editorial · v3.7· 2026-02-28 08:08:30 0
Summary Freedom of Expression Neutral
A news article reporting SETI@home's closure after 21 years. The content demonstrates minimal engagement with human rights principles, primarily through structural support for freedom of expression via reader comments. Overall, neutral journalism with tangential human rights relevance focused on project reporting rather than advocacy.
I have wondered about folding@home as well, another distributed project begun in another age that seems not, from the outside, to have lived up to its early hype. In the meantime, it seems that Alphafold has surpassed conventional efforts at understanding protein folding, including folding@home's. https://moalquraishi.wordpress.com/2018/12/09/alphafold-casp...
Anectdata: I set up an old computer with this in 2009, but a few months later I heard about this thing called cryptocurrency mining...
EDIT: The article notes that they are reaching a point of diminishing returns with the distributed nature of the SETI@HOME tasks, but I can't help wondering if things like crypto had an impact on participation with this and other @HOME-style academic projects[0].
I can remember my high school science teacher sometime between 2001-2002 telling us about this project and you'd see this running on his computer any time he wasn't using it.
I always wondered what came out of it and how cool it felt to feel like you could, as an individual, help support something massive by doing something so small.
In case anyone reads the headline and thinks that the SETI research center itself is shutting down, or that the project failed in some way:
> "It's a lot of work for us to manage the distributed processing of data. We need to focus on completing the back-end analysis of the results we already have, and writing this up in a scientific journal paper," their news announcement stated.
Maybe it's PR speak, but it does make sense to me that there'd be a point of diminishing returns where enough data has been processed.
I had the brilliant experience of visiting the Allen Telescope Array and meeting Jill and her husband before the announcement of their $100MM donation a few years ago. I have to say that it is an incredibly lean operation ran by the smartest people I've ever met. The @HOME project was more about being able to help handle throughput they would've otherwise just had to dump. I think it makes sense to sit back and spend time reevaluating what's been collected such that the filters can be evolved into something more efficient. I don't think they've spent time seriously trying to apply AI, yet. I'd be eager to hear their opinions on the subject.
I worked in a debt collection center where all the call center people used Linux workstations running wy60 terminals and a custom check viewer I wrote in Java (had to reverse engineer our vendors that I did get working in Wine, but it crashed a lot).
Installations and updates were automated. After getting the company logo and xplanet in the background, I got permission to put SETI@Home and FOLDING@Home on the machines (I think I did half and half). After all the machines were barely doing anything other than terminals and rendering TIFFs. Our company name was listed as the team.
Looks like the stats are off line for SETI@Home teams .. wonder how much that cluster kept contributing after I left.
Seems a bit misleading, they're not distributing more work units, not closing the research center. Nonetheless, this is sad news to me. My entire career path in the tech world was because I got a campus job working for SETI@home.
I remember being a younger pup and building fleets of machines (including overclocking, etc) for the sole purpose of running S@H, and all of the amazing software the spun up around it... SetiSpy, SetiDriver, SetiQ. I often wonder how machines of today would compare in work production to my old Duron 800, but alas.
Ah, good memories of being temporarily banned in the EE labs at UT Austin for running set@home on a bunch of the unix boxes. Must have been around 2000.
Not to sound like a broken record (I and others have said this or similar on these kinds of threads) but... I, personally, have become convinced that looking for signals this way is actually pointless.
The argument is basically this:
1. Within 1000 years (and maybe a lot less) we will have the engineering capability to build space habitats, powered by solar power. This last part is important because this thought experiment isn't gated on commercial viability of nuclear fusion power, which I'm not yet convinced is possible.
2. These space habitats are far more efficient at creating living area than planets. I forget the exact numbers but something like 1% of the mass of Mercury is enough to create enough living area for something like 10^16 to 10^18 people.
3. Space habitats are more convenient and cheaper to move between than leaving or even entering a gravity well like Earth's.
4. Roughly one billionth of the Sun's energy hits the Earth.
5. Once you have the ability to create one of these things, each becomes progressively easier.
This, of course, is the classic Dyson Swarm. Originally this was called a Dyson Sphere but this has led some to think it's a solid shell around a star. That was never the intent. Even if it was, no known or currently theorized material could support this.
Dyson Swarms are not subtle. Even a partial Dyson Swarm should be detectable as a large IR source compared to how much visible light is produced. This is because the only way for something in space to cool down is to radiate that heat away and physics determines the wavelength of that based on the temperature of the object.
Standard objection: what if you can recycle that heat? Well, you can't do that perfectly (as this would violate Thermodynamics) and even if you reduce IR emissions by 90%, you've simply reduced the IR emissions by one order of magnitude. For comparison, the Sun produces roughly 4x10^26 Watts of power.
So if you accept the above premises the gap between stabbing each other with swords and having this technology, at least for us, is 1000-2000 years, a cosmic blink of an eye to produce signals without the above IR signature. Those are long odds.
Personally I subscribe to the view that technological life is, at least within a billion light years of us, is likely quite rare.
The above is a very superficial summary of a topic that Isaac Arthur's channel goes into great depth about. I guarantee you any objection you have has at least one video that goes into that in great depth.
There was a promise at the time (still active, I'm sure) that if your computer discovered a signal from ET, you would be listed as co-discoverer of alien life. I still remember watching the screensaver crunch through work units with the tiny but real hope that the data on my computer had that signal.
Even at the time, the prize seemed a little unearned, since all you had to do was click through an installer. But it was still an incentive. Probably the greatest lottery prize that's ever been offered.
I ran it on the weekend once on the queue at Disney animation, maybe a hundred CPUs on SGI Origins. Went from zero to top ten-ish percentile in a half hour or so. Good times until I got a stern talking to by some systems guy.
I had just left Berkeley when this was released. I remember installing it on every computer I had access to, which was a lot, because I was in IT at a startup so I could put it on every desktop we had. And every server we had (but of course at nice 19, until management found out).
For a while we were in the top 10, until much bigger companies got in on it.
Kinda sad to see it shut down, but to be fair, I haven't run it in years.
Just the other day I saw a post about the current status [0] of the Voyager probes, the farthest man-made objects that we have sent out so far. [1]
It made me wonder about the possibility of an alien species discovering them. Probably infinitesimal, barring divine intervention. I mean, what are the chances of us stumbling upon similar probes sent out by another species who had no idea we were here? Do we even have the tech to detect something so small entering our solar system, even if it were to pass close to Earth?
You might have done the same, but I am still sharing this because this has influenced me a lot:
I bought an AMD Duron, some arctic silver heat paste. I took a lead pencil to connect some dots on the CPU to unlock the multiplier freely, got a freaking heat sink, and overclocked the hell out of the Duron. I needed to hide this from my parents, but of course the plan was to crunch 24/7.
I found another screenshot, the file is called "[email protected]". Looks like I knew what I was doing:
Edit: looks like our team (OC-CARD.de) was actually among the top 200 of all SETI teams. Wow, yeah there were some serious people in the team, like "Butcho", ranking in the top 1000 of individuals. No idea who that guy was and where he got the compute resources from. That's the romantic part of that Internet era.
"The owner of this website (www.bleepingcomputer.com) has banned the autonomous system number (ASN) your IP address is in (20473) from accessing this website." - thanks, owner...
I'm a little sad about this. My dad works in computer storage and had access to lots of computers doing nothing. He's now at "just about 11 quintillion flops, 99.12% ranking vs all other users"
I'm not an expert in either this or cryptocurrency, but it always seemed like these two would be a good marriage of technologies rather than having crypto mining rigs waste resources on unproductive proof of work algorithms. Does anyone know why that wasn't feasible or didn't catch on?
The two approaches aren't directly comparable. Alphafold predicts the optimum structure for a sequence, while folding@home explores protein dynamics (how a protein's structure changes over time).
I got chewed out at my workplace around 1999 or so. We had a couple hundred SUN workstations on the network and anyone could run commands remotely on any workstation. So I set up a cron job to spawn SETI@home jobs on every workstation every night at 9pm, shutting them down at 6am the next morning.
I was way up there in the rankings for a while, until the sysadmins started investigating the strange traffic patterns...
I worked for a large insurance company, my first job, when SETI@Home was launched. It was a typical large cubicle farm. I remember sneaking around to any unused WindowsNT workstation around me and installing it. Good times, good times.
I personally suspect the engineering challenges might pale next to the challenges of political organization.
Quite simply, the continued human expertise and organization necessary to manage and sustain such a system is far, far beyond anything we have today.
We can't even manage to globally reduce CO2, and the recent government responses to coronavirus have led a lot to be desired, to say the least.
Just because you put people up in space habitats doesn't mean they become any less power-hungry, any more cooperative, or any more peaceful.
You say we'll have the engineering in 1,000 years, and I could buy that. But read Aristotle's Politics from 2,400 years ago, which is concerned mainly with political stability and revolution, and he might as well be describing people today.
I'd like to see us manage "spaceship earth" a helluva lot better before I have even the remotest faith we could manage space habitats politically. Heck, we couldn't even manage Biosphere 2, remember?
>3. Space habitats are more convenient and cheaper to move between than leaving or even entering a gravity well like Earth's.
I have always thought that this would be a much more efficient way of living off Earth. Sci-fi wants us to believe that we can teraform planets. All they ever talk about are the atmosphere generators. However, they never address the reason the planet didn't have an atmosphere to begin with. To me, the research into generating artificial magnetic shields is the place to be. Generating those fields the size of a planet will be orders of magnitude more difficult than for smaller sized ships.
I don't think the discovery was required to be ET. I think that if the blip your system discovered was anything significant (pulsar or something), you'd get the credit. It was after all your machine and electricity that you paid for to do the discovery. It was the precursor to crypto proof of work.
When I first got my i7 6-core with quad GTX-690s (2 GPUs per card), I naively let Seti@Home run rampant when the computer was idle. Room they were in got up to around 90F when I let it run 100%.
I always thought the more realistic answer was that the window to detect an emerging civilization is on the order of a couple decades. In that time they go from simple easily detectable modulation schemes that are broadcast at very high power to modulation schemes that are nearly impossible to differentiate from noise at much higher efficiency/lower power levels. Much like we have, in the 1950's it was all high power TV/Radio signals which were radiating into space on fairly narrow bands. Now days we have really wide band signals using really advanced modulation techniques frequently sitting at or below the noise floor (GPS!) and frequently very short range (5G!).
Then using your Drake equation variables calculate how many are within those couple decades at any given point that you can see.
This is based on the current knowledge of physics that we have. We know that it is fairly incomplete.
~5% of the universe is made of the stuff that you, I, a cloud, and the sun are made of. We understand this stuff very well, in terms of cosmic scale stuff.
~20% of the universe if made of dark matter. We know that this stuff falls down and really doesn't do anything else. Does it interact with itself, with us, can we make sandwiches out of it? No clue.
~75% of the universe is made out of dark energy. We know that this stuff makes other things ... fall up (?). Well, kinda, maybe? We're totally at a loss as to what the super-majority of the universe is, let alone what it is doing, or what we can do with it.
Presumably, if there are other intelligences out there, they may know if they can do anything with the other ~95% of the universe and they may be making it into burritos or something. We're a long way away from concluding anything about anything.
Modern encrypted spread-spectrum digital radio would have looked like random noise until quite recently. I'm not sure if you'd pointed all the technology and all the brilliant minds that existed in 1930, at a modern cellular tower, that they'd have recognized the signals to be coming from a technological civilization.
In another century we'll no doubt be hugging the noise floor even more closely. It's not hard to imagine that even if alien civilizations are broadcasting omnidirectionally all around us, that we're simply too primitive to bother targeting with a message. Why waste the effort when you'd be able to communicate so much more information, and more efficiently, by targeting just a slightly higher baseline of receiving technology?
Back in the day when I was working at Sun, a script was set up that people were running on their workstations all over the world. It set up the Seti at Home client and link it to a single account. It was very popular, and some people were running it on the most powerful lab servers they had. Sun was trading places with SGI for the number one spot for a while.
I just bought a powerful mac mini, but due to other projects arising, it sits idle. I am curious if anyone has suggestions.
I looked through a dozen or so BOINC projects, but they all seem dead. The amicable pairs project had some 2020 results and activity in its forum, but I couldn’t draw a line to any practical goal.
That said, maybe the sorts of projects that have practical outcomes don’t need to rely on the computing power of strangers.
>>I always wondered what came out of it and how cool it felt to feel like you could, as an individual, help support something massive by doing something so small.
You can still participate in Folding@Home, which in my opinion is a far more worthy pursuit - actual medical science came out of it and more is still being produced.
18 years ago I ran it for months in the off hours on all the companies servers in one datacenter (about 500 which was quite a lot at that time). Fun times.
The singular in "journal paper" makes me sad. Surely there'd be more papers in this topic, on distributed computing for one, on the methodology of the analysis for another, and on any results for third.
I ran it before I went to school in the morning and before I went to bed at night for a few days. Then the novelty wore off. Also, it interfered with my downloads. I also remember I watched Contact on tv around that time and it got me hyped about doing my part to discover extraterrestial life.
Just wanted to say thx for writing a blogpost. Rare to see great history snippets left as a comment on HN with any link to a longer form content from the author’s perspective if one is curious.
Yeah. You wouldn't believe the number of idiots that went around covertly attempting to run this (and similar) on the production Unix servers of their employer.
Saying that as the lead Solaris SysAdmin for a large telco project a few decades ago, with one manager in particular who repeatedly kept on firing it up on the main (high end SunFire) billing cluster servers. Even when expressly told not to. That guy was a f*cking moron. :(
Article reports facts using official statements and includes multiple reader comments reflecting diverse community perspectives, supporting public discourse.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
Article quotes official SETI@home announcement explaining the closure decision.
Five reader comments are included, each expressing distinct personal perspectives on the project.
Public comment section is available for readers to post responses to the article.
Inferences
Including official statements alongside community responses indicates openness to multiple viewpoints on the topic.
Comment functionality demonstrates structural infrastructure enabling reader freedom of expression.
Site provides comment section enabling readers to express personal opinions and experiences, demonstrating structural support for freedom of expression.
build 1ad9551+j7zs · deployed 2026-03-02 09:09 UTC · evaluated 2026-03-02 11:31:12 UTC
Support HN HRCB
Each evaluation uses real API credits. HN HRCB runs on donations — no ads, no paywalls.
If you find it useful, please consider helping keep it running.