| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite A critical review of Gödel, Escher, Bach with a personal and analytical tone.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 4 evals | |
Audit Trail
9 entries | 2026-03-05 21:06 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 21:06 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 20:51 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.130 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 20:51 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.13 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-03 05:17 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.06) | - - | | 2026-03-03 05:17 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.06 (Neutral) | | | reasoning A blog post discussing Douglas Hofstadter's book Gödel, Escher, Bach, focusing on its literary and educational merits. | | 2026-03-03 05:17 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R | - - | | 2026-03-03 05:14 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.03) | - - | | 2026-03-03 05:14 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.03 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Book review, neutral stance, mixed alignment | | |
| |