| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite Discussion on blacklisting Forbes due to their problematic practices.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 4 evals | |
Audit Trail
8 entries | 2026-03-05 22:04 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.600 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 22:04 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.60 (Strong positive) | | | 2026-03-05 21:56 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.474 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 21:56 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.47 (Moderate negative) | | | 2026-03-01 03:46 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.40) | - - | | 2026-03-01 03:46 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) | | | reasoning Editorial discussion on blacklisting Forbes for user protection | | 2026-03-01 03:42 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.20) | - - | | 2026-03-01 03:42 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.20 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Community discusses rights to ad-free browsing | | |
| |