| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite Article critiques Amazon's actions against punctuation in a calm and reasoned tone.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 5 evals | |
Audit Trail
10 entries | 2026-03-05 22:20 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 22:20 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 22:12 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.080 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 22:12 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.08 (Neutral) | | | 2026-03-02 20:31 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-03-02 20:31 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | | | reasoning Editorial neutral stance | | 2026-03-02 20:30 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.24) | - - | | 2026-03-02 20:30 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.24 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning ED, slightly positive lean on punctuation rights | | 2026-03-02 20:27 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-03-02 20:27 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Editorial neutral stance | | |
| |