| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
| Summary ~lite Article critiques exploitative workplace wellness initiatives, citing real-life examples and expert studies.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 2 evals | |
Audit Trail
5 entries | 2026-03-11 01:35 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.050 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-11 01:35 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.05 (Neutral) | | | 2026-03-11 01:31 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.15) | - - | | 2026-03-11 01:31 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.15 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Editorial critiques workplace wellbeing initiatives, implies human rights concerns | | 2026-03-11 01:31 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R | - - | | |
| |