Domain Factions signal-profile clustering
Domains grouped by editorial character — how they cover topics, not just what they score. Signal landscape shows 13 dimensions: 5 core (HRCB, editorial, structural, confidence, SETL) and 8 editorial character signals. Clustering uses the 8 editorial dimensions with cosine similarity on z-normalized vectors and golden ratio (φ) tier thresholds.
Signal Landscape how 46 domains distribute across core and editorial dimensions · colored lines mark cluster centroids
Core Signals
HRCB HRCB Score
-0.16–-0.10: 1 domains -0.10–-0.04: 1 domains -0.04–0.02: 2 domains 0.02–0.08: 5 domains 0.08–0.14: 3 domains 0.14–0.20: 6 domains 0.20–0.26: 4 domains 0.26–0.32: 10 domains 0.32–0.38: 5 domains 0.38–0.44: 4 domains 0.44–0.50: 4 domains 0.50–0.55: 1 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.32 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.05 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.32 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.34 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.28 High PT/FW: 0.15 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.25 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.33 -0.16 0.55
E Editorial Channel
0.00–0.05: 4 domains 0.05–0.09: 2 domains 0.09–0.14: 4 domains 0.14–0.18: 7 domains 0.18–0.23: 3 domains 0.23–0.27: 7 domains 0.27–0.32: 6 domains 0.32–0.36: 6 domains 0.36–0.41: 4 domains 0.41–0.45: 1 domains 0.45–0.50: 1 domains 0.50–0.54: 1 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.29 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.12 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.30 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.32 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.28 High PT/FW: 0.17 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.18 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.26 0.00 0.54
S Structural Channel
-0.13–-0.09: 2 domains -0.09–-0.04: 2 domains -0.04–0.00: 1 domains 0.00–0.05: 4 domains 0.05–0.10: 4 domains 0.10–0.14: 6 domains 0.14–0.19: 4 domains 0.19–0.24: 8 domains 0.24–0.28: 6 domains 0.28–0.33: 0 domains 0.33–0.38: 3 domains 0.38–0.42: 6 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.21 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.02 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.25 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.28 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.17 High PT/FW: 0.03 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.18 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.28 -0.13 0.42
CONF Confidence
0.05–0.08: 4 domains 0.08–0.12: 4 domains 0.12–0.15: 6 domains 0.15–0.19: 7 domains 0.19–0.22: 8 domains 0.22–0.26: 4 domains 0.26–0.29: 2 domains 0.29–0.33: 3 domains 0.33–0.36: 3 domains 0.36–0.40: 3 domains 0.40–0.43: 1 domains 0.43–0.47: 1 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.18 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.15 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.25 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.29 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.27 High PT/FW: 0.16 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.24 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.27 0.05 0.47
SETL Structural-Editorial Tension
-0.25–-0.20: 1 domains -0.20–-0.14: 0 domains -0.14–-0.09: 1 domains -0.09–-0.04: 3 domains -0.04–0.02: 0 domains 0.02–0.07: 5 domains 0.07–0.12: 6 domains 0.12–0.18: 12 domains 0.18–0.23: 7 domains 0.23–0.28: 6 domains 0.28–0.34: 2 domains 0.34–0.39: 3 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.14 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.09 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.17 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.18 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.30 High PT/FW: 0.21 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.02 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: -0.00 -0.25 0.39
Editorial Character (used for clustering)
EQ Epistemic Quality (EQ)
0.27–0.32: 1 domains 0.32–0.36: 3 domains 0.36–0.41: 1 domains 0.41–0.46: 2 domains 0.46–0.50: 0 domains 0.50–0.55: 1 domains 0.55–0.59: 4 domains 0.59–0.64: 4 domains 0.64–0.68: 7 domains 0.68–0.73: 12 domains 0.73–0.78: 9 domains 0.78–0.82: 2 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.71 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.46 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.75 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.63 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.69 High PT/FW: 0.66 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.77 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.61 0.27 0.82
SO Solution Orientation (SO)
0.07–0.13: 2 domains 0.13–0.20: 3 domains 0.20–0.26: 3 domains 0.26–0.32: 2 domains 0.32–0.39: 8 domains 0.39–0.45: 6 domains 0.45–0.51: 4 domains 0.51–0.58: 5 domains 0.58–0.64: 6 domains 0.64–0.70: 1 domains 0.70–0.77: 2 domains 0.77–0.83: 4 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.68 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.23 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.45 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.52 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.33 High PT/FW: 0.38 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.38 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.56 0.07 0.83
SR Stakeholder Rep (SR)
0.08–0.13: 1 domains 0.13–0.17: 2 domains 0.17–0.21: 1 domains 0.21–0.26: 0 domains 0.26–0.30: 5 domains 0.30–0.35: 7 domains 0.35–0.39: 3 domains 0.39–0.44: 10 domains 0.44–0.48: 5 domains 0.48–0.53: 9 domains 0.53–0.57: 1 domains 0.57–0.62: 2 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.44 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.29 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.50 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.40 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.41 High PT/FW: 0.36 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.48 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.38 0.08 0.62
TD Transparency (TD)
0.00–0.07: 3 domains 0.07–0.15: 1 domains 0.15–0.22: 1 domains 0.22–0.30: 3 domains 0.30–0.37: 1 domains 0.37–0.45: 6 domains 0.45–0.52: 7 domains 0.52–0.59: 6 domains 0.59–0.67: 6 domains 0.67–0.74: 4 domains 0.74–0.82: 4 domains 0.82–0.89: 4 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.63 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.18 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.73 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.49 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.56 High PT/FW: 0.52 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.72 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.45 0.00 0.89
PT Propaganda Techniques (PT)
0.00–0.44: 13 domains 0.44–0.89: 5 domains 0.89–1.33: 5 domains 1.33–1.78: 8 domains 1.78–2.22: 5 domains 2.22–2.67: 3 domains 2.67–3.11: 0 domains 3.11–3.56: 3 domains 3.56–4.00: 2 domains 4.00–4.44: 1 domains 4.44–4.89: 0 domains 4.89–5.33: 1 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.92 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.94 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.90 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.71 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.84 High PT/FW: 0.96 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.96 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.99 0.00 5.33
AR Arousal (AR)
0.08–0.14: 2 domains 0.14–0.20: 3 domains 0.20–0.26: 1 domains 0.26–0.33: 3 domains 0.33–0.39: 6 domains 0.39–0.45: 8 domains 0.45–0.51: 10 domains 0.51–0.57: 3 domains 0.57–0.63: 7 domains 0.63–0.69: 2 domains 0.69–0.76: 0 domains 0.76–0.82: 1 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.43 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.26 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.54 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.57 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.63 High PT/FW: 0.41 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.32 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.21 0.08 0.82
VA Valence (VA)
-0.70–-0.59: 1 domains -0.59–-0.48: 1 domains -0.48–-0.37: 3 domains -0.37–-0.26: 1 domains -0.26–-0.14: 4 domains -0.14–-0.03: 11 domains -0.03–0.08: 8 domains 0.08–0.19: 5 domains 0.19–0.30: 3 domains 0.30–0.41: 2 domains 0.41–0.52: 3 domains 0.52–0.63: 4 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.47 Low EQ/SO/SR: -0.05 High EQ/SR · Low VA: -0.25 High AR · Low EQ/PT: -0.04 High AR · Low SO/PT: -0.40 High PT/FW: 0.06 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.07 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.22 -0.70 0.63
FW Fair Witness (FW)
0.51–0.52: 5 domains 0.52–0.53: 4 domains 0.53–0.54: 5 domains 0.54–0.55: 7 domains 0.55–0.56: 6 domains 0.56–0.57: 5 domains 0.57–0.58: 3 domains 0.58–0.59: 5 domains 0.59–0.60: 1 domains 0.60–0.61: 2 domains 0.61–0.62: 2 domains 0.62–0.63: 1 domains High EQ/SO/TD: 0.58 Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.54 High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.58 High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.53 High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.54 High PT/FW: 0.58 High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.58 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.55 0.51 0.63
Colored lines = cluster centroids High EQ/SO/TD Low EQ/SO/SR High EQ/SR · Low VA High AR · Low EQ/PT High AR · Low SO/PT High PT/FW High EQ/SR · Low AR High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD
Landscape Overview parallel coordinates — each line is a domain across 8 signal dimensions
8 clusters 46 domains 2 unaligned Most differentiating: AR Least differentiating: SR
EQ 0.82 0.27 SO 0.83 0.07 SR 0.62 0.08 TD 0.89 0.00 PT 1.00 0.56 AR 0.82 0.08 VA 0.63 -0.70 FW 0.63 0.51 blog.google (unaligned) www.xda-developers.com (unaligned) hacks.mozilla.org (High EQ/SO/TD) missing.csail.mit.edu (High EQ/SO/TD) spectrum.ieee.org (High EQ/SO/TD) theconversation.com (High EQ/SO/TD) unsung.aresluna.org (High EQ/SO/TD) justine.lol (High EQ/SO/TD) hackaday.com (High EQ/SO/TD) blogs.windows.com (High EQ/SO/TD) blog.cloudflare.com (High EQ/SO/TD) worksinprogress.co (Low EQ/SO/SR) twitter.com (Low EQ/SO/SR) www.youtube.com (Low EQ/SO/SR) www.neowin.net (Low EQ/SO/SR) www.cnn.com (Low EQ/SO/SR) www.cnbc.com (Low EQ/SO/SR) jsonline.com (Low EQ/SO/SR) fortune.com (Low EQ/SO/SR) apnews.com (Low EQ/SO/SR) www.theguardian.com (High EQ/SR · Low VA) www.404media.co (High EQ/SR · Low VA) www.propublica.org (High EQ/SR · Low VA) www.wiz.io (High EQ/SR · Low VA) www.zdnet.com (High EQ/SR · Low VA) shkspr.mobi (High EQ/SR · Low VA) www.bbc.com (High EQ/SR · Low VA) daringfireball.net (High EQ/SR · Low VA) archive.org (High AR · Low EQ/PT) www.thebignewsletter.com (High AR · Low EQ/PT) f-droid.org (High AR · Low EQ/PT) www.anthropic.com (High AR · Low EQ/PT) www.eff.org (High AR · Low EQ/PT) idiallo.com (High AR · Low EQ/PT) www.marginalia.nu (High AR · Low EQ/PT) garymarcus.substack.com (High AR · Low EQ/PT) www.theregister.com (High AR · Low SO/PT) www.engadget.com (High AR · Low SO/PT) www.dropsitenews.com (High AR · Low SO/PT) 9to5google.com (High PT/FW) www.newscientist.com (High PT/FW) 9to5mac.com (High PT/FW) arstechnica.com (High EQ/SR · Low AR) arxiv.org (High EQ/SR · Low AR) github.com (High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD) en.wikipedia.org (High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD) High EQ/SO/TD (cluster centroid) Low EQ/SO/SR (cluster centroid) High EQ/SR · Low VA (cluster centroid) High AR · Low EQ/PT (cluster centroid) High AR · Low SO/PT (cluster centroid) High PT/FW (cluster centroid) High EQ/SR · Low AR (cluster centroid) High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD (cluster centroid) High EQ/SO/TD — EQ: 0.71 High EQ/SO/TD — SO: 0.68 High EQ/SO/TD — SR: 0.44 High EQ/SO/TD — TD: 0.63 High EQ/SO/TD — PT: 0.92 High EQ/SO/TD — AR: 0.43 High EQ/SO/TD — VA: 0.47 High EQ/SO/TD — FW: 0.58 Low EQ/SO/SR — EQ: 0.46 Low EQ/SO/SR — SO: 0.23 Low EQ/SO/SR — SR: 0.29 Low EQ/SO/SR — TD: 0.18 Low EQ/SO/SR — PT: 0.94 Low EQ/SO/SR — AR: 0.26 Low EQ/SO/SR — VA: -0.05 Low EQ/SO/SR — FW: 0.54 High EQ/SR · Low VA — EQ: 0.75 High EQ/SR · Low VA — SO: 0.45 High EQ/SR · Low VA — SR: 0.50 High EQ/SR · Low VA — TD: 0.73 High EQ/SR · Low VA — PT: 0.90 High EQ/SR · Low VA — AR: 0.54 High EQ/SR · Low VA — VA: -0.25 High EQ/SR · Low VA — FW: 0.58 High AR · Low EQ/PT — EQ: 0.63 High AR · Low EQ/PT — SO: 0.52 High AR · Low EQ/PT — SR: 0.40 High AR · Low EQ/PT — TD: 0.49 High AR · Low EQ/PT — PT: 0.71 High AR · Low EQ/PT — AR: 0.57 High AR · Low EQ/PT — VA: -0.04 High AR · Low EQ/PT — FW: 0.53 High AR · Low SO/PT — EQ: 0.69 High AR · Low SO/PT — SO: 0.33 High AR · Low SO/PT — SR: 0.41 High AR · Low SO/PT — TD: 0.56 High AR · Low SO/PT — PT: 0.84 High AR · Low SO/PT — AR: 0.63 High AR · Low SO/PT — VA: -0.40 High AR · Low SO/PT — FW: 0.54 High PT/FW — EQ: 0.66 High PT/FW — SO: 0.38 High PT/FW — SR: 0.36 High PT/FW — TD: 0.52 High PT/FW — PT: 0.96 High PT/FW — AR: 0.41 High PT/FW — VA: 0.06 High PT/FW — FW: 0.58 High EQ/SR · Low AR — EQ: 0.77 High EQ/SR · Low AR — SO: 0.38 High EQ/SR · Low AR — SR: 0.48 High EQ/SR · Low AR — TD: 0.72 High EQ/SR · Low AR — PT: 0.96 High EQ/SR · Low AR — AR: 0.32 High EQ/SR · Low AR — VA: 0.07 High EQ/SR · Low AR — FW: 0.58 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD — EQ: 0.61 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD — SO: 0.56 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD — SR: 0.38 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD — TD: 0.45 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD — PT: 0.99 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD — AR: 0.21 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD — VA: 0.22 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD — FW: 0.55
High EQ/SO/TD Low EQ/SO/SR High EQ/SR · Low VA High AR · Low EQ/PT High AR · Low SO/PT High PT/FW High EQ/SR · Low AR High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD Unaligned Thick lines = cluster centroids · Thin lines = individual domains · Bundled = agreement · Crossing = divergence
Faction ≥ 1/φ (0.618) Alliance ≥ 1/φ² (0.382) Acquaintance ≥ 1/φ³ (0.236)
Signal Space PCA projection of 8D editorial character — each point is a domain
rendering…
hover a point for details
Low EQ/SO/SR High EQ/SO/TD High EQ/SR · Low VA High AR · Low EQ/PT High PT/FW High AR · Low SO/PT High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD High EQ/SR · Low AR Unaligned size = story count · color = HRCB score
PC1: EQ+TD · PC2: PT+AR · PC3: VA+SO (principal components of 8D editorial space)
What Drives Differentiation inter-cluster variance per signal dimension
AR Arousal: variance 0.998 0.998 VA Valence: variance 0.785 0.785 PT Propaganda (inv): variance 0.670 0.670 TD Transparency: variance 0.599 0.599 EQ Epistemic Quality: variance 0.539 0.539 SO Solution Orientation: variance 0.534 0.534 FW Fair Witness: variance 0.501 0.501 SR Stakeholder Rep: variance 0.314 0.314
High EQ/SO/TD 9 domains · 89 stories +0.35
🛠 Solution Builders — Content oriented toward actionable outcomes, combining strong epistemic standards with a focus on constructive approaches.
Most distinctive in Valence (above population median).
EQ SO SR TD PT AR VA FW EQ: 0.71 SO: 0.68 SR: 0.44 TD: 0.63 PT: 0.92 AR: 0.43 VA: 0.47 FW: 0.58
cluster - - - population median
Key Characteristics
measured Advocates global moderate SETL +0.14
Pts 521 Cmts 208 Karma 28,881 HRCB 2+/0~/0-
Members
* Liminal: hacks.mozilla.org → High EQ/SR · Low AR (0.47) spectrum.ieee.org → High EQ/SR · Low AR (0.62) theconversation.com → High EQ/SR · Low AR (0.73) unsung.aresluna.org → High EQ/SR · Low AR (0.72) justine.lol → High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD (0.55) hackaday.com → High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD (0.55)
Low EQ/SO/SR 9 domains · 366 stories +0.08
📋 Minimalist Wire — Sparse editorial signals across most dimensions. Stripped-down, wire-service-style content with minimal editorial fingerprint.
Most distinctive in Transparency (below population median).
EQ SO SR TD PT AR VA FW EQ: 0.46 SO: 0.23 SR: 0.29 TD: 0.18 PT: 0.94 AR: 0.26 VA: -0.05 FW: 0.54
cluster - - - population median
Key Characteristics
measured Acknowledges global moderate SETL +0.09
Pts 255 Cmts 181 Karma 19,271 HRCB 4+/1~/1-
Members
* Liminal: twitter.com → High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD (0.41) www.youtube.com → High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD (0.44) www.neowin.net → High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD (0.45) www.cnbc.com → High PT/FW (0.53) fortune.com → High PT/FW (0.44)
High EQ/SR · Low VA 8 domains · 164 stories +0.25
📰 Watchdog Press — Fact-heavy reporting that favors observable evidence over positive framing. Investigative style that surfaces structural issues.
Most distinctive in Valence (below population median).
EQ SO SR TD PT AR VA FW EQ: 0.75 SO: 0.45 SR: 0.50 TD: 0.73 PT: 0.90 AR: 0.54 VA: -0.25 FW: 0.58
cluster - - - population median
Key Characteristics
measured Advocates national moderate SETL +0.17
Pts 481 Cmts 247 Karma 15,872 HRCB 2+/0~/0-
Members
* Liminal: www.theguardian.com → High EQ/SR · Low AR (0.56) www.404media.co → High AR · Low SO/PT (0.57) www.propublica.org → High EQ/SR · Low AR (0.58) shkspr.mobi → High EQ/SR · Low AR (0.55) www.bbc.com → High EQ/SR · Low AR (0.54) daringfireball.net → High AR · Low SO/PT (0.47)
High AR · Low EQ/PT 8 domains · 82 stories +0.34
📉 Understated Coverage — Below-average signal strength in multiple dimensions. Restrained editorial voice with limited use of rhetorical devices.
Most distinctive in Propaganda (inv) (below population median).
EQ SO SR TD PT AR VA FW EQ: 0.63 SO: 0.52 SR: 0.40 TD: 0.49 PT: 0.71 AR: 0.57 VA: -0.04 FW: 0.53
cluster - - - population median
Key Characteristics
urgent Advocates global moderate SETL +0.18
Pts 588 Cmts 271 Karma 28,300 HRCB 2+/0~/0-
Members
* Liminal: www.eff.org → High AR · Low SO/PT (0.43) idiallo.com → High AR · Low SO/PT (0.45) www.marginalia.nu → High AR · Low SO/PT (0.59) garymarcus.substack.com → High AR · Low SO/PT (0.56)
High AR · Low SO/PT 3 domains · 46 stories +0.23
📉 Understated Coverage — Below-average signal strength in multiple dimensions. Restrained editorial voice with limited use of rhetorical devices.
Most distinctive in Valence (below population median).
EQ SO SR TD PT AR VA FW EQ: 0.69 SO: 0.33 SR: 0.41 TD: 0.56 PT: 0.84 AR: 0.63 VA: -0.40 FW: 0.54
cluster - - - population median
Key Characteristics
measured Advocates global moderate SETL +0.30
Pts 503 Cmts 308 Karma 17,353 HRCB 2+/0~/0-
Members
* Liminal: www.theregister.com → High EQ/SR · Low VA (0.61) www.engadget.com → High AR · Low EQ/PT (0.66) www.dropsitenews.com → High EQ/SR · Low VA (0.58)
High PT/FW 3 domains · 41 stories +0.28
⚠ Persuasion Engines — Elevated use of propaganda techniques including emotional appeals, framing devices, and rhetorical strategies.
Most distinctive in Valence (above population median). Elevated propaganda techniques may indicate persuasion-oriented content.
EQ SO SR TD PT AR VA FW EQ: 0.66 SO: 0.38 SR: 0.36 TD: 0.52 PT: 0.96 AR: 0.41 VA: 0.06 FW: 0.58
cluster - - - population median
Key Characteristics
measured Acknowledges global accessible SETL +0.21
Pts 579 Cmts 348 Karma 22,256 HRCB 1+/0~/0-
Members
* Liminal: 9to5google.com → High EQ/SR · Low AR (0.66) 9to5mac.com → High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD (0.62)
High EQ/SR · Low AR 2 domains · 93 stories +0.25
🌊 Calm Observers — Measured, low-arousal coverage with strong epistemic grounding. Analytical rather than emotional in editorial character.
Most distinctive in Transparency (above population median). Elevated propaganda techniques may indicate persuasion-oriented content.
EQ SO SR TD PT AR VA FW EQ: 0.77 SO: 0.38 SR: 0.48 TD: 0.72 PT: 0.96 AR: 0.32 VA: 0.07 FW: 0.58
cluster - - - population median
Key Characteristics
measured Acknowledges global moderate SETL +0.02
Pts 87 Cmts 49 Karma 71,985 HRCB 2+/0~/0-
Members
* Liminal: arstechnica.com → High EQ/SR · Low VA (0.55) arxiv.org → High EQ/SR · Low VA (0.48)
High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD 2 domains · 948 stories +0.33
⚠ Persuasion Engines — Elevated use of propaganda techniques including emotional appeals, framing devices, and rhetorical strategies.
Most distinctive in Arousal (below population median). Elevated propaganda techniques may indicate persuasion-oriented content.
EQ SO SR TD PT AR VA FW EQ: 0.61 SO: 0.56 SR: 0.38 TD: 0.45 PT: 0.99 AR: 0.21 VA: 0.22 FW: 0.55
cluster - - - population median
Key Characteristics
measured Acknowledges global technical SETL -0.00
Pts 24 Cmts 12 Karma 27,573 HRCB 2+/0~/0-
Members
* Liminal: github.com → Low EQ/SO/SR (0.53) en.wikipedia.org → High EQ/SR · Low AR (0.54)
Inter-Cluster Affinity cosine similarity between cluster centroids
High EQ/SO/T.. Low EQ/SO/SR High EQ/SR ·.. High AR · Lo.. High AR · Lo.. High PT/FW High EQ/SR ·.. High SO/PT ·.. High EQ/SO/TD High EQ/SO/TD vs High EQ/SO/TD: 1.000 (Faction) 1.00 High EQ/SO/TD vs Low EQ/SO/SR: -0.582 (Rival) -0.58 Rival High EQ/SO/TD vs High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.064 (Neutral) 0.06 Neutral High EQ/SO/TD vs High AR · Low EQ/PT: -0.275 (Rival) -0.27 Rival High EQ/SO/TD vs High AR · Low SO/PT: -0.648 (Rival) -0.65 Rival High EQ/SO/TD vs High PT/FW: 0.199 (Neutral) 0.20 Neutral High EQ/SO/TD vs High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.393 (Alliance) 0.39 Alliance High EQ/SO/TD vs High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.335 (Acquaintance) 0.34 Acquaintance Low EQ/SO/SR Low EQ/SO/SR vs High EQ/SO/TD: -0.582 (Rival) -0.58 Rival Low EQ/SO/SR vs Low EQ/SO/SR: 1.000 (Faction) 1.00 Low EQ/SO/SR vs High EQ/SR · Low VA: -0.704 (Rival) -0.70 Rival Low EQ/SO/SR vs High AR · Low EQ/PT: -0.240 (Rival) -0.24 Rival Low EQ/SO/SR vs High AR · Low SO/PT: -0.190 (Rival) -0.19 Rival Low EQ/SO/SR vs High PT/FW: 0.172 (Neutral) 0.17 Neutral Low EQ/SO/SR vs High EQ/SR · Low AR: -0.348 (Rival) -0.35 Rival Low EQ/SO/SR vs High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.429 (Alliance) 0.43 Alliance High EQ/SR · Low VA High EQ/SR · Low VA vs High EQ/SO/TD: 0.064 (Neutral) 0.06 Neutral High EQ/SR · Low VA vs Low EQ/SO/SR: -0.704 (Rival) -0.70 Rival High EQ/SR · Low VA vs High EQ/SR · Low VA: 1.000 (Faction) 1.00 High EQ/SR · Low VA vs High AR · Low EQ/PT: -0.062 (Rival) -0.06 Rival High EQ/SR · Low VA vs High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.543 (Alliance) 0.54 Alliance High EQ/SR · Low VA vs High PT/FW: 0.123 (Neutral) 0.12 Neutral High EQ/SR · Low VA vs High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.538 (Alliance) 0.54 Alliance High EQ/SR · Low VA vs High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: -0.544 (Rival) -0.54 Rival High AR · Low EQ/PT High AR · Low EQ/PT vs High EQ/SO/TD: -0.275 (Rival) -0.27 Rival High AR · Low EQ/PT vs Low EQ/SO/SR: -0.240 (Rival) -0.24 Rival High AR · Low EQ/PT vs High EQ/SR · Low VA: -0.062 (Rival) -0.06 Rival High AR · Low EQ/PT vs High AR · Low EQ/PT: 1.000 (Faction) 1.00 High AR · Low EQ/PT vs High AR · Low SO/PT: 0.505 (Alliance) 0.50 Alliance High AR · Low EQ/PT vs High PT/FW: -0.888 (Rival) -0.89 Rival High AR · Low EQ/PT vs High EQ/SR · Low AR: -0.650 (Rival) -0.65 Rival High AR · Low EQ/PT vs High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: -0.571 (Rival) -0.57 Rival High AR · Low SO/PT High AR · Low SO/PT vs High EQ/SO/TD: -0.648 (Rival) -0.65 Rival High AR · Low SO/PT vs Low EQ/SO/SR: -0.190 (Rival) -0.19 Rival High AR · Low SO/PT vs High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.543 (Alliance) 0.54 Alliance High AR · Low SO/PT vs High AR · Low EQ/PT: 0.505 (Alliance) 0.50 Alliance High AR · Low SO/PT vs High AR · Low SO/PT: 1.000 (Faction) 1.00 High AR · Low SO/PT vs High PT/FW: -0.300 (Rival) -0.30 Rival High AR · Low SO/PT vs High EQ/SR · Low AR: -0.192 (Rival) -0.19 Rival High AR · Low SO/PT vs High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: -0.795 (Rival) -0.79 Rival High PT/FW High PT/FW vs High EQ/SO/TD: 0.199 (Neutral) 0.20 Neutral High PT/FW vs Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.172 (Neutral) 0.17 Neutral High PT/FW vs High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.123 (Neutral) 0.12 Neutral High PT/FW vs High AR · Low EQ/PT: -0.888 (Rival) -0.89 Rival High PT/FW vs High AR · Low SO/PT: -0.300 (Rival) -0.30 Rival High PT/FW vs High PT/FW: 1.000 (Faction) 1.00 High PT/FW vs High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.499 (Alliance) 0.50 Alliance High PT/FW vs High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.241 (Acquaintance) 0.24 Acquaintance High EQ/SR · Low AR High EQ/SR · Low AR vs High EQ/SO/TD: 0.393 (Alliance) 0.39 Alliance High EQ/SR · Low AR vs Low EQ/SO/SR: -0.348 (Rival) -0.35 Rival High EQ/SR · Low AR vs High EQ/SR · Low VA: 0.538 (Alliance) 0.54 Alliance High EQ/SR · Low AR vs High AR · Low EQ/PT: -0.650 (Rival) -0.65 Rival High EQ/SR · Low AR vs High AR · Low SO/PT: -0.192 (Rival) -0.19 Rival High EQ/SR · Low AR vs High PT/FW: 0.499 (Alliance) 0.50 Alliance High EQ/SR · Low AR vs High EQ/SR · Low AR: 1.000 (Faction) 1.00 High EQ/SR · Low AR vs High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 0.237 (Acquaintance) 0.24 Acquaintance High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD vs High EQ/SO/TD: 0.335 (Acquaintance) 0.34 Acquaintance High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD vs Low EQ/SO/SR: 0.429 (Alliance) 0.43 Alliance High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD vs High EQ/SR · Low VA: -0.544 (Rival) -0.54 Rival High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD vs High AR · Low EQ/PT: -0.571 (Rival) -0.57 Rival High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD vs High AR · Low SO/PT: -0.795 (Rival) -0.79 Rival High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD vs High PT/FW: 0.241 (Acquaintance) 0.24 Acquaintance High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD vs High EQ/SR · Low AR: 0.237 (Acquaintance) 0.24 Acquaintance High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD vs High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD: 1.000 (Faction) 1.00
Allied Acquaintance Neutral Rival
Interesting Pairs editorially similar across clusters & divergent within clusters
Cross-Cluster Harmony
Domain ADomain BSimClusters
arstechnica.com theconversation.com 0.749 High EQ/SR · Low AR / High EQ/SO/TD
arstechnica.com spectrum.ieee.org 0.742 High EQ/SR · Low AR / High EQ/SO/TD
arstechnica.com unsung.aresluna.org 0.732 High EQ/SR · Low AR / High EQ/SO/TD
spectrum.ieee.org www.wiz.io 0.701 High EQ/SO/TD / High EQ/SR · Low VA
arstechnica.com 9to5google.com 0.699 High EQ/SR · Low AR / High PT/FW
9to5google.com spectrum.ieee.org 0.692 High PT/FW / High EQ/SO/TD
www.404media.co www.dropsitenews.com 0.675 High EQ/SR · Low VA / High AR · Low SO/PT
blogs.windows.com archive.org 0.655 High EQ/SO/TD / High AR · Low EQ/PT
en.wikipedia.org arxiv.org 0.654 High SO/PT · Low EQ/TD / High EQ/SR · Low AR
arxiv.org theconversation.com 0.652 High EQ/SR · Low AR / High EQ/SO/TD
Intra-Cluster Tension
Domain ADomain BSimCluster
spectrum.ieee.org hackaday.com -0.068 High EQ/SO/TD
www.eff.org garymarcus.substack.com -0.048 High AR · Low EQ/PT
daringfireball.net www.zdnet.com -0.044 High EQ/SR · Low VA
archive.org garymarcus.substack.com 0.006 High AR · Low EQ/PT
apnews.com worksinprogress.co 0.007 Low EQ/SO/SR
f-droid.org garymarcus.substack.com 0.052 High AR · Low EQ/PT
garymarcus.substack.com www.thebignewsletter.com 0.090 High AR · Low EQ/PT
www.cnbc.com apnews.com 0.113 Low EQ/SO/SR
hackaday.com blog.cloudflare.com 0.114 High EQ/SO/TD
apnews.com www.youtube.com 0.126 Low EQ/SO/SR
Outliers & Lone Wolves domains not assigned to any cluster, sorted by outlier score
Domain HRCB Outlier Nearest Cluster Similarity Key Signal Tone
blog.google ND 1.15 High AR · Low EQ/PT 0.36 Acquaintance SR celebratory
www.xda-developers.com ND 1.01 High PT/FW 0.24 Acquaintance FW measured
Methodology Notes

Clustering input: 8 signal dimensions per domain — Epistemic Quality (EQ), Solution Orientation (SO), Stakeholder Representation (SR), Transparency (TD), Propaganda Techniques (PT, inverted), Arousal (AR), Valence (VA), Fair Witness (FW).

Z-normalization: Each dimension is standardized to zero mean and unit variance across all domains with 3+ evaluations. Missing values are imputed as 0 (population mean). Domains with >3 missing dimensions are flagged.

Similarity: Cosine similarity on z-normalized 8D vectors measures editorial character similarity independent of magnitude.

Clustering: Agglomerative hierarchical clustering with average linkage. Pairs are sorted by descending similarity and greedily merged when average inter-cluster similarity ≥ 1/φ (~0.618). If this produces a single giant cluster, the fallback threshold 1/φ² (~0.382) is used.

Golden ratio tiers: Faction ≥ 1/φ (0.618) · Alliance ≥ 1/φ² (0.382) · Acquaintance ≥ 1/φ³ (0.236) · Neutral ≥ 0 · Rival < 0

Parallel coordinates: Each domain is drawn as a polyline across 8 vertical axes (one per signal dimension). Values are normalized to the observed min/max per dimension. Thick lines show cluster centroids; thin lines show individual domains. Bundled lines indicate agreement; crossing lines indicate divergence.

Archetype naming: ~12 pattern rules map signal combinations to descriptive names (e.g., high EQ + high TD + low PT → “Rigorous Analysts”). Fallback uses marker-based names.

Minimum data: Requires 5+ domains with 3+ evaluations each.